Evaluating early interim fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography with the SUV_max-liver-based interpretation for predicting the outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

References

• Sun N, Zhao J, Qiao W, et al. Predictive value of interim PET/CT in DLBCL treated with R-CHOP: meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:648572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasnovas RO, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. SUVmax reduction improves early prognosis value of interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2011;118:37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti E, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. An international confirmatory study of the prognostic value of early PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: comparison between Deauville criteria and DeltaSUVmax. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:1312–1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostakoglu L, Goldsmith SJ, Leonard JP, et al. FDG-PET after 1 cycle of therapy predicts outcome in diffuse large cell lymphoma and classic Hodgkin disease. Cancer. 2006;107:2678–2687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, et al. Early restaging positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1356–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terasawa T, Lau J, Bardet S, et al. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for interim response assessment of advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1906–1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamot C, Klingbiel D, Hitz F, et al. Final results of a prospective evaluation of the predictive value of interim positron emission tomography in patients with diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP-14 (SAKK 38/07). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2523–2529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3048–3058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meignan M, Gallamini A, Meignan M, et al. Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-Scan in Lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50:1257–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meignan M, Gallamini A, Haioun C, et al. Report on the Second International Workshop on interim positron emission tomography in lymphoma held in Menton, France, 8–9 April 2010. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51:2171–2180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meignan M. Interim PET in lymphoma: a step towards standardization. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1821–1823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinzani PL, Gandolfi L, Broccoli A, et al. Midtreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer. 2011;117:1010–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pregno P, Chiappella A, Bello M, et al. Interim 18-FDG-PET/CT failed to predict the outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated at the diagnosis with rituximab-CHOP. Blood. 2012;119:2066–2073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safar V, Dupuis J, Itti E, et al. Interim [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy plus rituximab. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:184–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo C, Lee DH, Kim JE, et al. Limited role of interim PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. Ann Hematol. 2011;90:797–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang DH, Ahn JS, Byun BH, et al. Interim PET/CT-based prognostic model for the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the post-rituximab era. Ann Hematol. 2013;92:471–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horning SJ, Juweid ME, Schoder H, et al. Interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an independent expert nuclear medicine evaluation of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E3404 study. Blood. 2010;115:775–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Itti E, Haioun C, et al. Early 18F-FDG PET for prediction of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment versus visual analysis. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1626–1632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti E, Lin C, Dupuis J, et al. Prognostic value of interim 18F-FDG PET in patients with diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment at 4 cycles of chemotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:527–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadzadehfar H, Rodrigues M, Zakavi R, et al. Prognostic significance of the standardized uptake value of pre-therapeutic (18)F-FDG PET in patients with malignant lymphoma. Med Oncol. 2011;28:1570–1576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manohar K, Mittal BR, Bhattacharya A, et al. Prognostic value of quantitative parameters derived on initial staging 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:974–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheson BD. The International Harmonization Project for response criteria in lymphoma clinical trials. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2007;21:841–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasnovas RO, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. Early interim PET scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: can there be consensus about standardized reporting, and can PET scans guide therapy choices? Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2012;7:193–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059–3068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashen AF, Dehdashti F, Luo J, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for early response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: poor predictive value of international harmonization project interpretation. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:386–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis J, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Julian A, et al. Impact of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography response evaluation in patients with high-tumor burden follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy: a prospective study from the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte and GOELAMS. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4317–4322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tychyj-Pinel C, Ricard F, Fulham M, et al. PET/CT assessment in follicular lymphoma using standardized criteria: central review in the PRIMA study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:408–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti E, Juweid ME, Haioun C, et al. Improvement of early 18F-FDG PET interpretation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: importance of the reference background. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1857–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams HJ, Kwee TC. Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET in R-CHOP-treated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;106:55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar