Continuing challenges and current issues in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

References

• Hunger SP, Mullighan CG. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1541–1552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbour E, O’Brien S, Konopleva M, et al. New insights into the pathophysiology and therapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2015;121:2517–2528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Version 2. 2016 [cited 2017 Jan 1]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp
   Google Scholar
• Pulte D, Gondos A, Brenner H. Improvement in survival in younger patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia from the 1980s to the early 21st century. Blood. 2009;113:1408–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thörn I, Forestier E, Botling J, et al. Minimal residual disease assessment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a Swedish multi-centre study comparing real-time polymerase chain reaction and multicolour flow cytometry. Br J Haematol. 2011;152:743–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedreira CE, Costa ES, Lecrevisse Q, et al. Overview of clinical flow cytometry data analysis: recent advances and future challenges. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:415–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faham M, Zheng J, Moorhead M, et al. Deep-sequencing approach for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2012;120:5173–5180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dongen JJ, van der Velden VH, Brüggemann M, et al. Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies. Blood. 2015;125:3996–4009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisco MJ, Sykes PJ, Hughes E, et al. Monitoring minimal residual disease in peripheral blood in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1997;99:314–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Velden VH, Jacobs DC, Wijkhuijs AJ, et al. Minimal residual disease levels in bone marrow and peripheral blood are comparable in children with T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but not in precursor-B-ALL. Leukemia. 2002;16:1432–1436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coustan-Smith E, Sancho J, Hancock ML, et al. Use of peripheral blood instead of bone marrow to monitor residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2002;100:2399–2402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Ustwani O, Gupta N, Bakhribah H, et al. Clinical updates in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;99:189–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökbuget N, Kneba M, Raff T, et al. Adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and molecular failure display a poor prognosis and are candidates for stem cell transplantation and targeted therapies. Blood. 2012;120:1868–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribera JM, Oriol A, Morgades M, et al. Treatment of high-risk Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and adults according to early cytologic response and minimal residual disease after consolidation assessed by flow cytometry: final results of the PETHEMA ALL-AR-03 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1595–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassan R, Spinelli O, Oldani E, et al. Improved risk classification for risk-specific therapy based on the molecular study of minimal residual disease (MRD) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Blood. 2009;113:4153–4162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beldjord K, Chevret S, Asnafi V, et al. Oncogenetics and minimal residual disease are independent outcome predictors in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2014;123:3739–3749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhédin N, Huynh A, Maury S, et al. Role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with Ph− negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2015;125:2486–2496. quiz 2586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüggemann M, Raff T, Flohr T, et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2006;107:1116–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidriales MB, Pérez JJ, López-Berges MC, et al. Minimal residual disease in adolescent (older than 14 years) and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemias: early immunophenotypic evaluation has high clinical value. Blood. 2003;101:4695–4700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassan R, Spinelli O, Oldani E, et al. Different molecular levels of post-induction minimal residual disease may predict hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcome in adult Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2014;4:e225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Advani AS. Perspectives and future directions for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016;16:S6–S9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock W, Johnson JL, Stone RM, et al. Dose intensification of daunorubicin and cytarabine during treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 19802. Cancer. 2013;119:90–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantarjian HM, O’Brien S, Smith TL, et al. Results of treatment with hyper-CVAD, a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:547–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran E, Stock W. How I treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia in older adolescents and young adults. Blood. 2015;125:3702–3710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke ME, Albritton K, Marina N. Challenges in the recruitment of adolescents and young adults to cancer clinical trials. Cancer. 2007;110:2385–2393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pui CH, Robison LL, Look AT. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 2008;371:1030–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts KG, Li Y, Payne-Turner D, et al. Targetable kinase-activating lesions in Ph− like acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1005–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaynon PS, Angiolillo AL, Carroll WL, et al. Long-term results of the children’s cancer group studies for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia 1983–2002: a Children’s Oncology Group Report. Leukemia. 2010;24:285–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghrabi A, Levy DE, Asselin B, et al. Results of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium Protocol 95-01 for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2007;109:896–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper SL, Brown PA. Treatment of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015;62:61–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulsipher MA, Peters C, Pui CH. High-risk pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: to transplant or not to transplant? Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:S137–S148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock W, La M, Sanford B, et al. What determines the outcomes for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on cooperative group protocols? A comparison of Children’s Cancer Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies. Blood. 2008;112:1646–1654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boissel N, Auclerc MF, Lhéritier V, et al. Should adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia be treated as old children or young adults? Comparison of the French FRALLE-93 and LALA-94 trials. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:774–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bont JM, Holt B, Dekker AW, et al. Significant difference in outcome for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on pediatric vs adult protocols in the Netherlands. Leukemia. 2004;18:2032–2035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanujachar R, Richards S, Hann I, et al. Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: outcome on UK national paediatric (ALL97) and adult (UKALLXII/E2993) trials. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;48:254–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry E, DeAngelo DJ, Neuberg D, et al. Favorable outcome for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Consortium Protocols. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:813–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachman JB, Sather HN, Sensel MG, et al. Augmented post-induction therapy for children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia and a slow response to initial therapy. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1663–1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelo D, Stevenson K, Neuberg D. A multicenter phase II study using a dose intensified PEGylated-asparaginase pediatric regimen in adults with untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a DFCI ALL Consortium trial. Blood 2015;126:80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock W, Luger SM, Advani AS, et al. Favorable outcomes for older adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): early results of U.S. Intergroup Trial C10403. Blood. 2014;124:796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribera JM, Oriol A, Sanz MA, et al. Comparison of the results of the treatment of adolescents and young adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Programa Español de Tratamiento en Hematología pediatric-based protocol ALL-96. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1843–1849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet F, Leguay T, Raffoux E, et al. Pediatric-inspired therapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the GRAALL-2003 study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:911–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douer D, Aldoss I, Lunning MA, et al. Pharmacokinetics-based integration of multiple doses of intravenous pegaspargase in a pediatric regimen for adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:905–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijneveld AW, van der Holt B, Daenen SM, et al. Intensified chemotherapy inspired by a pediatric regimen combined with allogeneic transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia up to the age of 40. Leukemia. 2011;25:1697–1703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitenbach K, Stock W. Intergroup trial C10403: a pediatric treatment approach to improve outcomes in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2011;1:107–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelo DJ, Stevenson KE, Dahlberg SE, et al. Long-term outcome of a pediatric-inspired regimen used for adults aged 18–50 years with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2015;29:526–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Extermann M, Hurria A. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1824–1831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurria A, Gupta S, Zauderer M, et al. Developing a cancer-specific geriatric assessment: a feasibility study. Cancer. 2005;104:1998–2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokbuget N, Beck J, Bruggemann M. Moderate intensive chemotherapy including CNS prophylaxis with liposomal cytarabine is feasible and effective in older patients with Ph− negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): results of a prospective trial from the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL (GMALL). Blood. 2012;120:1493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignetti M, Fazi P, Cimino G, et al. Imatinib plus steroids induces complete remissions and prolonged survival in elderly Philadelphia chromosome-positive patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia without additional chemotherapy: results of the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell’Adulto (GIMEMA) LAL0201-B protocol. Blood. 2007;109:3676–3678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foà R, Vitale A, Vignetti M, et al. Dasatinib as first-line treatment for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2011;118:6521–6528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki K, Jabbour E, O’Brien S, et al. Inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy (mini-hyper-CVD) as frontline therapy for older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): interim result of a phase II clinical trial. Blood. 2016;128:588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blinatumomab and combination chemotherapy or dasatinib, prednisone, and blinatumomab in treating older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemiablinatumomab and combination chemotherapy or dasatinib, prednisone and blinatumomab in treating older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. NCT02143414. Available from: http://www.clinicaltrial.gov
   Google Scholar
• Batlevi CL, Matsuki E, Brentjens RJ, et al. Novel immunotherapies in lymphoid malignancies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13:25–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klebanoff CA, Khong HT, Antony PA, et al. Sinks, suppressors and antigen presenters: how lymphodepletion enhances T cell-mediated tumor immunotherapy. Trends Immunol. 2005;26:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brentjens RJ, Davila ML, Riviere I, et al. CD19-targeted T cells rapidly induce molecular remissions in adults with chemotherapy-refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:177ra38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila ML, Riviere I, Wang X, et al. Efficacy and toxicity management of 19–28z CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:224ra25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1507–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DW, Kochenderfer JN, Stetler-Stevenson M, et al. T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet. 2015;385:517–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Geyer MB, Brentjens RJ. CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapeutics for hematologic malignancies: interpreting clinical outcomes to date. Blood. 2016;127:3312–3320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topp MS, Gökbuget N, Stein AS, et al. Safety and activity of blinatumomab for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DW, Gardner R, Porter DL, et al. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood. 2014;124:188–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grupp SA, Kalos M, Barrett D, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1509–1518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turtle CJ, Hanafi LA, Berger C, et al. CD19 CAR-T cells of defined CD4+:CD8+ composition in adult B cell ALL patients. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:2123–2138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochenderfer JN, Wilson WH, Janik JE, et al. Eradication of B-lineage cells and regression of lymphoma in a patient treated with autologous T cells genetically engineered to recognize CD19. Blood. 2010;116:4099–4102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter DL, Hwang WT, Frey NV, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells persist and induce sustained remissions in relapsed refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:303ra139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter D, Frey N, Melenhorst J, et al. Randomized, phase II dose optimization study of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T cells directed against CD19 in patients with relapsed, refractory CLL. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3009–3009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökbuget N, Stanze D, Beck J, et al. Outcome of relapsed adult lymphoblastic leukemia depends on response to salvage chemotherapy, prognostic factors, and performance of stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;120:2032–2041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oriol A, Vives S, Hernández-Rivas JM,et al. Outcome after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adult patients included in four consecutive risk-adapted trials by the PETHEMA Study Group. Haematologica. 2010;95:589–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhadfar N, Litzow MR. New monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Res. 2016;49:13–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas DA, O’Brien S, Faderl S, et al. Chemoimmunotherapy with a modified hyper-CVAD and rituximab regimen improves outcome in de novo Philadelphia chromosome-negative precursor B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3880–3889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maury S, Chevret S, Thomas X, et al. Addition of rituximab improves the outcome of adult patients with CD20-positive, Ph− negative, B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL): results of the randomized Graall-R 2005 Study. Blood. 2015;126:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maury S, Chevret S, Thomas X, et al. Rituximab in B-lineage adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1044–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Thomas D, et al. Phase II study of the hyper-CVAD regimen in combination with ofatumumab as frontline therapy for adults with CD-20 positive ALL. Blood. 2013;122:2664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalle S, Reslan L, Besseyre de Horts T, et al. Preclinical studies on the mechanism of action and the anti-lymphoma activity of the novel anti-CD20 antibody GA101. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011;10:178–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagorsen D, Kufer P, Baeuerle PA, et al. Blinatumomab: a historical perspective. Pharmacol Ther. 2012;136:334–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovanni M, Hervé D, Patrice C, et al. Complete molecular and hematologic response in adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) following treatment with blinatumomab: results from a phase 2 single-arm, multicenter study (ALCANTARA). Blood 2015;126:679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topp MS, Gökbuget N, Zugmaier G, et al. Long-term follow-up of hematologic relapse-free survival in a phase 2 study of blinatumomab in patients with MRD in B-lineage ALL. Blood. 2012;120:5185–5187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökbuget N, Dombret H, Bonifacio M, et al. Long-term outcomes after blinatumomab treatment: follow-up of a phase 2 study in patients (Pts) with minimal residual disease (MRD) positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Blood. 2015;126:680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topp MS, Gökbuget N, Zugmaier G, et al. Phase II trial of the anti-CD19 bispecific T cell-engager blinatumomab shows hematologic and molecular remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:4134–4140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topp M, Stein A, Nicola G, et al. Blinatumomab improved overall survival in patients with relapsed or refractory Philadelphia negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a randomized open label phase 3 study (TOWER). Haematologica. 2016;101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantarjian H, Stein A, Gökbuget N, et al. Blinatumomab versus chemotherapy for advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:836–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantarjian HM, DeAngelo DJ, Stelljes M, et al. Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:740–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juliusson G, Karlsson K, Lazarevic VLj, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation rates and long-term survival in acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia: real-world population-based data from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry 1997–2006. Cancer. 2011;117:4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliansky DM, Larson RA, Weisdorf D, et al. The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: update of the 2006 evidence-based review. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18:16–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebban C, Lepage E, Vernant JP, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission: a comparative study. French Group of Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:2580–2587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas X, Boiron JM, Huguet F, et al. Outcome of treatment in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: analysis of the LALA-94 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4075–4086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunault M, Harousseau JL, Delain M, et al. Better outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia after early genoidentical allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) than after late high-dose therapy and autologous BMT: a GOELAMS trial. Blood. 2004;104:3028–3037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labar B, Suciu S, Zittoun R, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma for patients < or =50 years old in first complete remission: results of the EORTC ALL-3 trial. Haematologica. 2004; 89:809–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, et al. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission, and an autologous transplantation is less effective than conventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the International ALL Trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). Blood. 2008;111:1827–1833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JJ, van der Holt B, Verhoef GE, et al. Myeloablative allogeneic versus autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission: a prospective sibling donor versus no-donor comparison. Blood. 2009;113:1375–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Richards S, Rowe J, et al. Allogeneic, but not autologous, hematopoietic cell transplantation improves survival only among younger adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Blood. 2013;121:339–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks DI, Wang T, Pérez WS, et al. The outcome of full-intensity and reduced-intensity conditioning matched sibling or unrelated donor transplantation in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first and second complete remission. Blood. 2010;116:366–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohty M, Labopin M, Volin L, et al. Reduced-intensity versus conventional myeloablative conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a retrospective study from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood. 2010;116:4439–4443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okasha D, Kirkwood A, Copland M, et al. Fludarabine, melphalan and alemtuzumab conditioned reduced intensity (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults aged >40 years with de novo Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: a prospective study from the UKALL14 Trial. Blood. 2015;126:733.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fielding AK, Rowe JM, Richards SM, et al. Prospective outcome data on 267 unselected adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia confirms superiority of allogeneic transplantation over chemotherapy in the pre-imatinib era: results from the International ALL Trial MRC UKALLXII/ECOG2993. Blood. 2009;113:4489–4496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleissner B, Gökbuget N, Bartram CR, et al. Leading prognostic relevance of the BCR-ABL translocation in adult acute B-lineage lymphoblastic leukemia: a prospective study of the German Multicenter Trial Group and confirmed polymerase chain reaction analysis. Blood. 2002;99:1536–1543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding AK, Rowe JM, Buck G, et al. UKALLXII/ECOG2993: addition of imatinib to a standard treatment regimen enhances long-term outcomes in Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2014;123:843–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas DA, Faderl S, Cortes J, et al. Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia with hyper-CVAD and imatinib mesylate. Blood. 2004;103:4396–4407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanada M, Naoe T. Imatinib combined chemotherapy for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: major challenges in current practice. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006;47:1747–1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson RA, Dodge RK, Burns CP, et al. A five-drug remission induction regimen with intensive consolidation for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: cancer and leukemia group B study 8811. Blood. 1995;85:2025–2037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalandon Y, Thomas X, Hayette S, et al. Randomized study of reduced-intensity chemotherapy combined with imatinib in adults with Ph− positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2015;125:3711–3719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz KR, Carroll A, Heerema NA, et al. Long-term follow-up of imatinib in pediatric Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children’s Oncology Group study AALL0031. Leukemia. 2014;28:1467–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekeres MA, Elson P, Kalaycio ME, et al. Time from diagnosis to treatment initiation predicts survival in younger, but not older, acute myeloid leukemia patients. Blood. 2009;113:28–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoli S, Bérard E, Huguet F, et al. Time from diagnosis to intensive chemotherapy initiation does not adversely impact the outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;121:2618–2626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daver N, Thomas D, Ravandi F, et al. Final report of a phase II study of imatinib mesylate with hyper-CVAD for the front-line treatment of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2015;100:653–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delannoy A, Cazin B, Thomas X, et al. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the elderly: an evaluation of interferon alpha given as a single agent after complete remission. Leuk Lymphoma. 2002;43:75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravandi F, Othus M, O’Brien S, et al. Multi-center US Intergroup Study of intensive chemotherapy plus dasatinib followed by allogeneic stem cell transplant in patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia younger than 60. Blood. 2015;126:796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravandi F, Othus M, O’Brien S, et al. US intergroup study of chemotherapy plus dasatinib and allogeneic stem cell transplant in Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL. Blood Advances. 2016;1:250–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DY, Joo YD, Lim SN, et al. Nilotinib combined with multiagent chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2015;126:746–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki K, Kantarjian HM, Ravandi F, et al. Updated results from phase II study of combination of hyper-CVAD (HCVAD) with ponatinib in frontline therapy of patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:abstr7036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Ravandi F, et al. Combination of hyper-CVAD with ponatinib as first-line therapy for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1547–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer H, Wassmann B, Pavlova A, et al. Kinase domain mutations of BCR-ABL frequently precede imatinib-based therapy and give rise to relapse in patients with de novo Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Blood. 2007;110:727–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soverini S, Vitale A, Poerio A, et al. Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients already harbor BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations at low levels at the time of diagnosis. Haematologica. 2011;96:552–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer H, Wassmann B, Bethge W, et al. Randomized comparison of prophylactic and minimal residual disease-triggered imatinib after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for BCR-ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2013;27:1254–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzow MR. Should anyone with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL who is negative for minimal residual disease receive a hematopoietic stem cell transplant in first remission? Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2016;29:345–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar