References
- Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS, et al. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:571–578.
- Meignan M, Gallamini A, Meignan M, et al. Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-Scan in Lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50:1257–1260.
- Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. JCO. 2014;32:3048–3058.
- Itti E, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. An international confirmatory study of the prognostic value of early PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: comparison between Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:1312–1320.
- Duehrsen UHA, Müller S, Hertenstein B, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) guided therapy of aggressive lymphomas – a randomized controlled trial comparing different treatment approaches based on interim PET results (PETAL Trial). Paper presented at: 56th ASH Annual meeting 391; 2014 Dec 3–6. San Diego, CA.
- Mamot C, Klingbiel D, Hitz F, et al. Final results of a prospective evaluation of the predictive value of interim positron emission tomography in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP-14 (SAKK 38/07). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2523–2529.
- Casasnovas RO, Ysebaert L, Thieblemont C, et al. A FDG-PET driven consolidation strategy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final results of a randomized phase II study. Blood. 2017 [12 July]; DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-02-766691
- Zhang Y, Fan Y, Ying Z, et al. Can the SUVmax-liver-based interpretation improve prognostic accuracy of interim and posttreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma? Leuk Lymphoma. 2018:59:660–669.
- Itti E, Juweid ME, Haioun C, et al. Improvement of early 18F-FDG PET interpretation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: importance of the reference background. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1857–1862.
- Casasnovas RO, Kanoun S, Tal I, et al. Baseline total metabolic volume (TMTV) to predict the outcome of patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) enrolled in the AHL2011 LYSA trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(Suppl. 15):7509.
- Hasenclever D, Kurch L, Mauz-Korholz C, et al. qPET - a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1301–1308.
- Quak E, Hovhannisyan N, Lasnon C, et al. The importance of harmonizing interim positron emission tomography in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: focus on the Deauville criteria. Haematologica. 2014;99:e84–e85.
- Quak E, Le Roux PY, Hofman MS, et al. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:2072–2082.
- Mikhaeel NG, Smith D, Dunn JT, et al. Combination of baseline metabolic tumour volume and early response on PET/CT improves progression-free survival prediction in DLBCL. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1209–1219.
- Cottereau AS, Becker S, Broussais F, et al. Prognostic value of baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV0) measured on FDG-PET/CT in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Ann Oncol. 2016;27:719–724.
- Dercle L, Seban RD, Lazarovici J, et al. 18F-FDG PET and CT-scan detect new imaging patterns of response and progression in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated by anti-PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitor. J Nucl Med. 2017 [8 June]; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193011