Impact of clinical utility of MRD assessment with different techniques on survival in acute B lymphoblastic leukemia

References

• Anderson K, Lutz C, van Delft FW, et al. Genetic variegation of clonal architecture and propagating cells in leukaemia. Nature. 2011;469:356–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salek C, Folber F, Fronkova E, et al. Early MRD response as a prognostic factor in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Eur J Haematol. 2016;96:276–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravandi F, Jorgensen JL, Thomas DA, et al. Detection of MRD may predict the outcome of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Blood. 2013;122:1214–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe JM, Buck G, Burnett AK, et al. Induction therapy for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of more than 1500 patients from the international ALL trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). Blood. 2005;106:3760–3767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, et al. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission and an autologous transplantation is less effective than conventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the International ALL Trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993) [J]. Blood. 2008;111:1827–1833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff T, Gokbuget N, Luschen S, et al. Molecular relapse in adult standard-risk ALL patients detected by prospective MRD monitoring during and after maintenance treatment: (GMALL 06/99 and 07/03 trials). Blood. 2007;109:910–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravandi F, Jorgensen JL, O’Brien SM, et al. Minimal residual disease assessed by multi-parameter flow cytometry is highly prognostic in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2016;172:392–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang MM, Fu H, Lai X, et al. Minimal residual disease at first achievement of complete remission predicts outcome in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome- negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campana D, Pui CH. Detection of minimal residual disease in acute leukemia: methodologic advances and clinical significance. Blood. 1995;85:1416–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribera JM, Oriol A, Morgades M, et al. Treatment of high-risk Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and adults according to early cytologic response and minimal residual disease after consolidation assessed by flow cytometry: final results of the PETHEMA ALL-AR-03 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1595–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beldjord K, Chevret S, Asnafi V, et al. Oncogenetics and minimal residual disease are independent outcome predictors in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2014;123:3739–3749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassan R, Spinelli O, Oldani E, et al. Improved risk classification for risk-specific therapy based on the molecular study of minimal residual disease (MRD) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Blood. 2009;113:4153–4162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dongen JJ, van der Velden VH, Bruggemann M, et al. Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies. Blood. 2015;125:3996–4009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli O, Tosi M, Peruta B, et al. Prognostic significance and treatment implications of minimal residual disease studies in Philadelphia-negative adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2014;6:e2014062.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gokbuget N, Kneba M, Raff T, et al. Adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and molecular failure display a poor prognosis and are candidates for stem cell transplantation and targeted therapies. Blood. 2012;120:1868–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–2405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang GS, Wu J, Liu M, et al. BCR-ABL1 and CD66c exhibit high concordance in minimal residual disease detection of adult B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Transl Res. 2015;7:632–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofran Y, Rowe JM. Introducing minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Curr Opin Hematol. 2015;22:139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolach O, Stevenson KE, Wadleigh M, et al. Allogeneic transplantation is not superior to chemotherapy in most patients over 40 years of age with Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission. Am J Hematol. 2016;91:793–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullarkat V, Slovak ML, Kopecky KJ, et al. Impact of cytogenetics on the outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Southwest oncology group 9400 study. Blood. 2008;111:2563–2572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruggemann M, Raff T, Flohr T, et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2006;107:1116–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor D, Moorman AV, Wade R, et al. Use of minimal residual disease assessment to redefine induction failure in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:660–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pui CH, Pei D, Raimondi SC, et al. Clinical impact of minimal residual disease in children with different subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with response-adapted therapy. Leukemia. 2017;31:333–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holowiecki J, Krawczyk-Kulis M, Giebel S, et al. Status of minimal residual disease after induction predicts outcome in both standard and high-risk Ph-negative adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The Polish Adult Leukemia Group ALL 4-2002 MRD Study. Br J Haematol. 2008;142:227–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel B, Rai L, Buck G, et al. Minimal residual disease is a significant predictor of treatment failure in non T-lineage adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: final results of the international trial UKALL XII/ECOG2993. Br J Haematol. 2010;148:80–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short NJ, Jabbour E, Sasaki K, et al. Impact of complete molecular response on survival in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2016;128:504–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemmaraju N, Kantarjian H, Jorgensen JL, et al. Significance of recurrence of minimal residual disease detected by multi-parameter flow cytometry in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in morphological remission. Am J Hematol. 2017;92: 279–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umeda K, Hiramatsu H, Kawaguchi K, et al. Impact of pretransplant minimal residual disease on the post-transplant outcome of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Transplant. 2016;20:692–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar