A retrospective, matched paired analysis comparing bendamustine containing BeEAM versus BEAM conditioning regimen: results from a single center experience

References

• Hagberg H, Gisselbrecht C, CORAL study group. Randomised phase III study of R-ICE versus R-DHAP in relapsed patients with CD20 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) followed by high-dose therapy and a second randomisation to maintenance treatment with rituximab or not: an update of the CORAL study. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:iv31–iv32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1540–1545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linch DC, Winfield D, Goldstone AH, et al. Dose intensification with autologous bone-marrow transplantation in relapsed and resistant Hodgkin’s disease: results of a BNLI randomised trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 1993;341:1051–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isidori A, Piccaluga PP, Loscocco F, et al. High-dose therapy followed by stem cell transplantation in Hodgkin's lymphoma: past and future. Expert Rev Hematol. 2013;6:451–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianni AM, Bregni M, Siena S, et al. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation compared with MACOP-B in aggressive B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1290–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milpied N, Deconinck E, Gaillard F, et al. Initial treatment of aggressive lymphoma with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell support. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1287–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haioun C, Lepage E, Gisselbrecht C, et al. Survival benefit of high-dose therapy in poor-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: final analysis of the prospective LNH87-2 protocol – a groupe d’Etude des lymphomes de l’Adulte study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3025–3030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiff PJ, Unger JM, Cook JR, et al. Autologous transplantation as consolidation for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1681–1690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappella A, Castellino A, Vitolo U. State-of-the-art therapy for advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2016;30:1147–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills W, Strang J, Goldstone AH, et al. Dose intensification of etoposide in the BEAM ABMT protocol for malignant lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 1995;17:263–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz N, Pfistner B, Sextro M, et al. Aggressive conventional chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for relapsed chemosensitive Hodgkin’s disease: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2065–2071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YB, Lane AA, Logan BR, et al. Impact of conditioning regimen on outcomes for patients with lymphoma undergoing high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:1046–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visani G, Malerba L, Stefani PM, et al. BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) before autologous stem cell transplantation is safe and effective for resistant/relapsed lymphoma patients. Blood. 2011;118:3419–3425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klastersky J, de Naurois J, Rolston K, et al. Management of febrile neutropaenia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:v111–v118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisselbrecht C, Glass B, Mounier N, et al. Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4184–4190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills W, Chopra R, McMillan A, et al. BEAM chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:588–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo J-C, Kang BW, Jang G, et al. BEAC or BEAM high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: comparative analysis of efficacy and toxicity. Ann Hematol. 2008;87:43–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salar A, Sierra J, Gandarillas M, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation for clinically aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: the role of preparative regimens. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;27:405–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isidori A, Christofides A, Visani G. Novel regimens prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for the management of adults with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma: alternatives to BEAM conditioning. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016;57:2499–2509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahl BS, Bartlett NL, Leonard JP, et al. Bendamustine is effective therapy in patients with rituximab-refractory, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from a multicenter study. Cancer. 2010;116:106–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi V. Metabolism and mechanisms of action of bendamustine: rationales for combination therapies. Semin Oncol. 2002;29:4–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichhorst B, Fink AM, Bahlo J, et al. First-line chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine and rituximab versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL10): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:928–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rummel MJ, Niederle N, Maschmeyer G, et al. Bendamustine plus rituximab versus CHOP plus rituximab as first-line treatment for patients with indolent and mantle-cell lymphomas: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013;381:1203–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rummel M, Kaiser U, Balser C, et al. Bendamustine plus rituximab versus fludarabine plus rituximab for patients with relapsed indolent and mantle-cell lymphomas: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visani G, Stefani PM, Capria S, et al. Bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan, and autologous stem cell rescue produce a 72% 3-year PFS in resistant lymphoma. Blood. 2014;124:3029–3031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isidori A, Guidi S, Scalzulli PR, et al. Benda-BEAM high-dose therapy prior to auto-SCT is effective in resistant/relapsed DLBCL. Blood. 2015;126:1999–1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garciaz S, Coso D, Schiano de Collela JM, et al. Bendamustine-based conditioning for non-Hodgkin lymphoma autologous transplantation: an increasing risk of renal toxicity. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51:319–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan S, Jimenez AM, Moreno AD, et al. Severe mucositis with bendamustine etoposide ara-C and melphalan (Be-EAM) as conditioning regimen in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (AutoSCT). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:S143–S144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilli S, Novak U, Taleghani BM, et al. BeEAM conditioning with bendamustine-replacing BCNU before autologous transplantation is safe and effective in lymphoma patients. Ann Hematol. 2017;96:421–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantepie S, Tchernonog E, Peyrade F, et al. Bendamustine-based (BeEAM) conditioning before autologous stem cell transplantation: result of a French multicenter study of 386 patients from LYSA centers. Blood. 2016;128:3450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar