Prognostic value of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in T-cell lymphomas

References

• Morton LM, Wang SS, Devesa SS, et al. Lymphoma incidence patterns by WHO subtype in the United States, 1992-2001. Blood. 2006;107(1):265–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vose J, Armitage J, Weisenburger D. International peripheral T-cell and natural killer/T-cell lymphoma study: pathology findings and clinical outcomes. JClin Oncol. 2008;26(25):4124–4130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisselbrecht C, Gaulard P, Lepage E, et al. Prognostic significance of T-cell phenotype in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA). Blood. 1998;92(1):76–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallamini A, Hutchings M, Rigacci L, et al. Early interim 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is prognostically superior to international prognostic score in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: a report from a joint Italian-Danish study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(24):3746–3752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Moon SH, Park LC, et al. The impact of baseline and interim PET/CT parameters on clinical outcome in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2012;87(9):937–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3048–3058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler-Sagie M, Bushelev O, Epelbaum R, et al. (18)F-FDG avidity in lymphoma readdressed: a study of 766 patients. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(1):25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cheson BD. Role of functional imaging in the management of lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(14):1844–1854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kako S, Izutsu K, Ota Y, et al. FDG-PET in T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(10):1685–1690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meignan M, Gallamini A, Itti E, et al. Report on the Third International Workshop on Interim Positron Emission Tomography in Lymphoma held in Menton, France, 26-27 September 2011 and Menton 2011 consensus. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53(10):1876–1881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meignan M, Gallamini A, Meignan M, et al. Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-Scan in Lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50(8):1257–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Itti E, Haioun C, et al. Early 18F-FDG PET for prediction of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment versus visual analysis. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(10):1626–1632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seam P, Juweid ME, Cheson BD. The role of FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma. Blood. 2007;110(10):3507–3516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059–3068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, et al. FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2006;107(1):52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallamini A, Kostakoglu L. Interim FDG-PET in Hodgkin lymphoma: a compass for a safe navigation in clinical trials? Blood. 2012;120(25):4913–4920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington SF, Kirkwood AA, Franceschetto A, et al. PET-CT for staging and early response: results from the response-adapted therapy in advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma study. Blood. 2016;127(12):1531–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang DH, Min JJ, Song HC, et al. Prognostic significance of interim (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT after three or four cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(9):1312–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Song YS, Lee JS, et al. Risk stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with interim PET-CT based on different cutoff Deauville scores. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59(2):340–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pregno P, Chiappella A, Bello M, et al. Interim 18-FDG-PET/CT failed to predict the outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated at the diagnosis with rituximab-CHOP. Blood. 2012;119(9):2066–2073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasamon YL, Wahl RL. FDG PET and risk-adapted therapy in Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2008;20(2):206–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahu X, Bodet-Milin C, Brissot E, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography before, during and after treatment in mature T/NK lymphomas: a study from the GOELAMS group. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(3):705–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casulo C, Schoder H, Feeney J, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and prognosis of T cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013;54(10):2163–2167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Galaly TC, Pedersen MB, Hutchings M, et al. Utility of interim and end-of-treatment PET/CT in peripheral T-cell lymphomas: a review of 124 patients. Am J Hematol. 2015;90(11):975–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS, et al. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):571–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Su M, Kosik RO, et al. The Deauville 5-Point Scale improves the prognostic value of interim FDG PET/CT in extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40(10):767–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon SH, Lee AY, Kim WS, et al. Value of interim FDG PET/CT for predicting outcome of patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58(6):1341–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasnovas RO, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. SUVmax reduction improves early prognosis value of interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2011;118(1):37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khong PL, Huang B, Lee EY, et al. (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT scan for early response assessment of SMILE therapy in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a prospective study from a single center. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(6):911–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottereau AS, El-Galaly TC, Becker S, et al. Predictive value of PET response combined with baseline metabolic tumor volume in peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(4):589–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung SH, Ahn JS, Kim YK, et al. Prognostic significance of interim PET/CT based on visual, SUV-based, and MTV-based assessment in the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar