280
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Different MAF translocations confer similar prognosis in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , , , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 1885-1893 | Received 29 Jan 2020, Accepted 24 Mar 2020, Published online: 19 Apr 2020

References

  • Rollig C, Knop S, Bornhauser M. Multiple myeloma. Lancet. 2015;385:2197–2208.
  • Ludwig H, Durie BG, Bolejack V, et al. Myeloma in patients younger than age 50 years presents with more favorable features and shows better survival: an analysis of 10 549 patients from the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood. 2008;111:4039–4047.
  • Hanbali A, Hassanein M, Rasheed W, et al. The evolution of prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Adv Hematol. 2017;2017:4812637.
  • Palumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, et al. Revised International Staging System for multiple myeloma: a report from International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2863–2869.
  • Sawyer JR. The prognostic significance of cytogenetics and molecular profiling in multiple myeloma. Cancer Genet. 2011;204:3–12.
  • Manier S, Salem K, Glavey SV, et al. Genomic aberrations in multiple myeloma. Cancer Treat Res. 2016;169:23–34.
  • Mikhael JR, Dingli D, Roy V, et al. Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines 2013. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:360–376.
  • Greipp PRS, Miguel J, Durie BG, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3412–3420.
  • Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al.; on behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2006;20:1467–1473.
  • Ross FM, Chiecchio L, Dagrada G, et al.; on behalf of the UK Myeloma Forum. The t(14;20) is a poor prognostic factor in myeloma but is associated with long-term stable disease in monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance. Haematologica. 2010 ;95:1221–1225.
  • Boyd KD, Ross FM, Chiecchio L, et al.; on behalf of the NCRI Haematology Oncology Studies Group. A novel prognostic model in myeloma based on co-segregating adverse FISH lesions and the ISS: analysis of patients treated in the MRC Myeloma IX trial. Leukemia. 2012;26:349–355.
  • Shah V, Sherborne AL, Walker BA, et al.; on behalf of the NCRI Haemato-oncology CSG. Prediction of outcome in newly diagnosed myeloma: a meta-analysis of the molecular profiles of 1905 trial patients. Leukemia. 2018;32:102–110.
  • Fonseca R, Blood E, Rue M, et al. Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma. Blood. 2003;101:4569–4575.
  • Avet-Loiseau H, Malard F, Campion L, et al.; for the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. Translocation t(14;16) and multiple myeloma: is it really an independent prognostic factor? Blood. 2011;117:2009–2011.
  • Mai EK, Benner A, Bertsch U, et al. Single versus tandem high-dose melphalan followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: long-term results from the phase III GMMG-HD2 trial. Br J Haematol. 2016;173:731–741.
  • Cavo M. Double autologous stem cell transplantation significantly prolongs progression-free survival and overall survival in comparison with single autotransplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an analysis of phase 3 EMN02/H095 study. Blood. 2017;130:401.
  • Walker BA, Leone PE, Chiecchio L, et al. A compendium of myeloma-associated chromosomal copy number abnormalities and their prognostic value. Blood. 2010;116:e56–e65.
  • Narita T, Inagaki A, Kobayashi T, et al. t(14;16)-positive multiple myeloma shows negativity for CD56 expression and unfavorable outcome even in the era of novel drugs. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e285–e285.
  • Pineda-Roman M, Zangari M, Haessler J, et al. Sustained complete remissions in multiple myeloma linked to bortezomib in total therapy 3: comparison with total therapy 2. Br J Haematol. 2008;140:625–634.
  • Qiang YW, Ye S, Chen Y, et al. MAF protein mediates innate resistance to proteasome inhibition therapy in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;128:2919–2930.
  • Ross FM, Avet-Loiseau H, Ameye G, et al.; on behalf of the European Myeloma Network. Report from the European Myeloma Network on interphase FISH in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Haematologica. 2012;97:1272–1277.
  • Rack KA, van den Berg E, Haferlach C, et al. European recommendations and quality assurance for cytogenomic analysis of haematological neoplasms. Leukemia. 2019;33:1851–1867.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.