References
- Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059–3068. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800
- Barrington SF, Trotman J. The role of PET in the first-line treatment of the most common subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Lancet Haematol. 2021;8(1):e80–e93. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30365-3
- Johnson P, Federico M, Kirkwood A, et al. Adapted treatment guided by interim PET-CT scan in advanced hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(25):2419–2429. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1510093
- André MPE, Girinsky T, Federico M, et al. Early positron emission tomography response–adapted treatment in stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma: final results of the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(16):1786–1794. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.68.6394
- Dührsen U, Müller S, Hertenstein B, et al. Positron emission tomography–guided therapy of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (PETAL): a multicenter, randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(20):2024–2034. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.76.8093
- Persky DO, Li H, Stephens DM, et al. Positron emission tomography–directed therapy for patients with limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results of intergroup national clinical trials network study S1001. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(26):3003–3011. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.00999
- Bailly C, Carlier T, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. Prognostic value of FDG-PET in patients with mantle cell lymphoma: results from the LyMa-PET project. Haematologica. 2020;105(1):e33–e36. doi:10.3324/haematol.2019.223016
- Bailly C, Carlier T, Touzeau C, et al. Interest of FDG-PET in the management of mantle cell lymphoma. Front Med. 2019;6:70. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00070
- Albano D, Treglia G, Gazzilli M, et al. 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT in mantle cell lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20(7):422–430. doi:10.1016/j.clml.2020.01.018
- Itti E, Meignan M, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. An international confirmatory study of the prognostic value of early PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: comparison between Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(9):1312–1320. doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2435-6
- Schöder H, Polley M-YC, Knopp MV, et al. Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET in diffuse large cell lymphoma: results from the CALGB 50303 clinical trial. Blood. 2020;135(25):2224–2234. doi:10.1182/blood.2019003277
- Allioux F, Gandhi D, Vilque J-P, et al. End-of-treatment 18 F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients: ΔSUV outperforms Deauville score. Leukemia Lymphoma. 2021;62(12):2890–2898. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1948028. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
- Eertink JJ, Burggraaff CN, Heymans MW, et al. Optimal timing and criteria of interim PET in DLBCL: a comparative study of 1692 patients. Blood Adv. 2021;5(9):2375–2384. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004467
- Mehta-Shah N, Ito K, Bantilan K, et al. Baseline and interim functional imaging with PET effectively risk stratifies patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2019;3(2):187–197. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024075
- Gouill SL, Thieblemont C, Oberic L, et al. Rituximab after autologous stem-cell transplantation in mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(13):1250–1260. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1701769