Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Professional Development for Rural Middle-School Science Teachers

References

• Althauser, K. (2015). Job-embedded professional development: Its impact on teacher self-efficacy and student performance. Teacher Development, 19(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1011346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, N., Cowen, J., Toma, E., & Troske, S. (2015). Working with what they have: Professional development as a reform strategy in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 30(10), 1–18. https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-08/30-10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blitz, C. L. (2013). Can online learning communities achieve the goals of traditional professional learning communities? What the literature says. (REL 2013-003). US Department do Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, L. A., Walsh, C., & Heyeres, M. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 104158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, A. S. G., Noonan, P. M., & McCall, Z. (2012). Effectiveness of online professional development for rural special educators. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051203100104
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, B., Konstantopoulos, S., Kubitskey, B. W., Vath, R., Park, G., Johnson, H., & Edelson, D. C. (2013). Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113494413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V. (1966). Testing homogeneity of variances. American Educational Research Journal, 3(3), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312003003187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann-Abell, C. F., Koppal, M., Roseman, J. E., & Sevian, H. (2016). Toward high school biology: Helping middle school students understand chemical reactions and conservation of mass in nonliving and living systems. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjalmarson, M. A., Holincheck, N., Baker, C. T., & Galanti, T. M. (2020). Learning models and modeling across the STEM disciplines. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 223–233). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt-Barron, S., Tracy, K. N., Howell, E., & Kaminski, R. (2015). Obstacles to enhancing professional development with digital tools in rural landscapes. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 30(2), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, M., & Popova, A. (2011). Formal and informal learning flows: Cohesion in web 2.0 environment. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/jissc.2011010101
   Google Scholar
• Lantz-Anderson, A., Lundin, M., & Selwyn, N. (2011). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008
   Google Scholar
• Lavalley, M. (2018). Out of the loop: Rural schools are largely left out of research and policy discussions, exacerbating poverty, inequity, and isolation. Center for Public Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED608842
   Google Scholar
• Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of STEM integration and education: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, K. M., & Wei, T. (2023). Professional development in collaborative online spaces: Supporting rural language teachers in a post-pandemic era. The New Educator, 19(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2023.2174279
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Nation’s report card. National Assessment of Educational Progress.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2015). Guide to implementing the next generation science standards. The National Academies Press. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/18290/next-generation-science-standards-for-states-by-states
   Google Scholar
• Powell, C. G., & Bodur, Y. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of an online professional development experience: Implications for a design and implementation framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J. (2013, September). What professional development strategies are needed for successful implementation of the next generation science standards? In Invitational Research Symposium on Science Assessment, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Saxton, E., Burns, R., Holveck, S., Kelley, S., Prince, D., Rigelman, N., & Skinner, E. A. (2014). A common measurement system for K-12 STEM education: Adopting an educational evaluation methodology that elevates theoretical foundations and systems thinking. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 40, 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Showalter, D., Hartman, S. L., Johnson, J., & Klein, B. (2019). Why rural matters 2018-2019: The time is now. A report of the rural school and community trust. Rural School and Community Trust. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED604580
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, F. C., & Kuo, F. Y. (2014). A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Computers & Education, 72, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2019). Rural poverty and well-being. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/rural-economy-population/rural-poverty-well-being/#demographics
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, E., & Migdal, R. (2019). Professional development: Teachers attitudes in online and traditional training course. Online Learning, 23(1), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. (2012). Supporting rural teachers. Principal, 26, 29. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ992661
   Google Scholar