Supporting the Development of Students’ Scientific Literacy

References

• Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. S. (2007). Expanding the research agenda for scientific literacyPromoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, & P. Wickman (Eds.), Geotryckeriet.
   Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (2014). From science studies to scientific literacy: A view from the classroom. Science & Education, 23(9), 1911–1932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9672-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, P., & Hashemi, S. S. (2016). Screen-based literacy practices in Swedish primary schools. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 11(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2016-02-01
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. J., Tippett, C. D., & Yore, L. D. (2010). Pacific CRYSTAL project: Explicit literacy instruction embedded in middle school science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9156-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer-Bradshaw, R. E. (2017). Teaching for scientific literacy? An examination of instructional practices in secondary schools in Barbados. Research in Science Education, 47(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9490-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed.). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L. (2009). Teaching the nature of science: Three critical questions. National Geographic School Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brock-Utne, B. (2012). Language policy and science: Could some African countries learn from some Asian countries? International Review of Education, 58(4), 481–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-012-9308-2
   Google Scholar
• Brock-Utne, B. (2017). Multilingualism in Africa: Marginalisation and empowerment. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Multilingualisms and development. British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J. (2017). Translanguaging in school contexts: International perspectives. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 16(4), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2017.1327816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, N., & Walan, S. (2023). Developing pre-service teachers’ competence in assessing socioscientific argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2018103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colucci-Gray, L., Perazzone, A., Dodman, M., & Camino, E. (2013). Science education for sustainability, epistemological reflections and educational practices: From natural sciences to trans-disciplinarity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(1), 127–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9405-3
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry research design: Choosing from five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crippen, K., & Antonenko, P. D. (2018). Designing for collaborative problem solving in STEM. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 89–116). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, D. K., & Arthurs, L. (2012). Improving student attitudes about learning science and student scientific reasoning skills. Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, 315. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub/315
   Google Scholar
• Eilks, I., Rauch, F., Ralle, B., & Hofstein, A. (2013). How to allocate the chemistry curriculum between science and society? In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching chemistry – A studybook (pp. 1–36). Sense.
   Google Scholar
• García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Garrard, G. (2010). Problems and prospects in ecocritical pedagogy. Environmental Education Research, 16(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504621003624704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M., & Lapp, D. (2011). Teaching science literacy. Educational Leadership, 68(6). https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/teaching-science-literacy
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2011). Looking to the future: Building a curriculum for social activism. Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education: A pedagogical justification and the state of the art in Israel, Germany and the USA. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1459–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 3–28). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koppal, M., & Caldwell, A. (2004). Meeting the challenge of science literacy: Project 2061 efforts to improve science education. Cell Biology Education, 3(1), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.03-10-0016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krajcik, J. S., & Sutherland, L. M. (2010). Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science, 328(5977), 456–459. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Brar, A., & Roihan, N. (2021). The use of digital technology to enhance language and literacy skills for indigenous people: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100035
   Google Scholar
• Littledyke, M. (2008). Science education for environmental awareness: Approaches to integrating cognitive and affective domains. Environmental Education Research, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701843301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X. (2013). Expanding notions of scientific literacy: A reconceptualization of aims of science education in the knowledge society. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity – Theory and practice (pp. 23–39). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. (2010). Relationship between teacher preparedness and inquiry-based instructional practices to students’ science achievement: Evidence from TIMSS 2007 [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania]. http://dspace.iup.edu/bitstream/handle/2069/280/Lynn%20Martin.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Mikeska, J. M., Shattuck, T., Holtzman, S., McCaffrey, D. F., Duchesneau, N., Qi, Y., & Stickler, L. (2017). Understanding science teaching effectiveness: Examining how science-specific and generic instructional practices relate to student achievement in secondary science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2594–2623. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1390796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. P. (2009). Educational reflections on the “ecological crisis”: Ecojustice, environmentalism, and sustainability. Science & Education, 18(8), 1031–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9179-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2015). The millennium development goals agenda: Constraints of culture, economy and empowerment in influencing the social mobility of Pakistani girls on mathematics and science related higher education courses in universities in Pakistan. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2014.992556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012) . A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naugah, J., Reiss, M. J., & Watts, M. (2019). Parents and their children’s choice of school science subjects and career intentions: A study from Mauritius. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(4), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1645107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedermeyer, W. (2008). Scientific literacy without a text. Education Week, 28(3), 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odom, A., Stoddard, E., & LaNasa, S. (2007). Teacher practices and middle-school science achievements. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1329–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601001971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, A. M., Kukner, J. M., & Timmons, D. J. (2014). Fostering literacy practices in secondary science and mathematics courses: Pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Language and Literacy, 16(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.20360/G2CS3Z
   Google Scholar
• Paulsrud, B. Y. (2014). English-medium instruction in Sweden: Perspectives and practices in two upper secondary schools [ Dissertations in Language Education 3]. Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Ploj Virtič, M. (2022). Teaching science & technology: Components of scientific literacy and insight into the steps of research. International Journal of Science Education, 44(12), 1916–1931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2105414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (2011). Competing visions of scientific literacy: The influence of a science curriculum policy image. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 11–27). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A. J., Mark, S., & Nazar, C. R. (2022). Gazing inward in support of critical scientific literacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2009973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2013). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In D. E. Alvermann, N. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 467–488). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, M., & Corrigan, D. (2014). Bangladeshi science teachers’ perspectives of scientific literacy and teaching practices. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1117–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9450-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, K. (2012). The subject-object transformations and ‘Bildung’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(3), 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, M. (2017). Strategies for integrating literacy into a science classroom. Graduate Research Papers. 115. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/115
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 65–88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4
   Google Scholar
• Sørvik, G. O., Blikstad Balas, M., & Ødegaard, M. (2015). Do books like these have authors? New roles for text and new demands on students in integrated science-literacy instruction. Science Education, 99(1), 39–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuckey, M., Heering, P., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Eilks, I. (2015). The philosophical works of Ludwik Fleck and their potential meaning for teaching and learning science. Science & Education, 24(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9723-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, K. W. H., & Li, W. (2021). Co-learning in Hong Kong English medium instruction mathematics secondary classrooms: A translanguaging perspective. Language and Education, 35(3), 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1837860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2020). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine Ideas for public action. https://en.unesco.org/news/education-post-covid-world-nine-ideas-public-action
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2020) . Towards an equal future: Reimagining girls’ education through STEM.
   Google Scholar
• Vacca, R. T., Vacca, J. A., & Mraz, M. E. (2011). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2016). Fostering scientific literacy and critical thinking in elementary science education. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 14(4), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, J., Mitchell, M. A., Clancy, E. E., & Silverman, R. D. (2017). An investigation of literacy practices in high school science classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(3), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1193832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. L., Franks, A. D., Kuo, L. J., McTigue, E. M., & Serrano, J. (2016). Both theory and practice: Science literacy instruction and theories of reading. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 14(7), 1275–1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9661-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis. Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education: Volume II (pp. 697–726). Routledge.
   Google Scholar