Absence of Iatrogenic or Contagion Effects in Adolescent Group Therapy: Findings from the Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study

REFERENCES

• Dishion TJ, McCord J, Poulin F. When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. Am Psych. 1999;54:755–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drug Strategies. Treating teens: A guide to adolescent drug programs. 2003; Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved on 4/6/06 from http://www.drugstrategies.org/teens/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford-Smith M, Dodge KA, Dishion TJ, McCord J. Peer influences in children and adolescents crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. J Ab Child Psych. 2005;33:255–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoag MJ, Burlingame GM. Evaluating the effectiveness of child and adolescent group treatment: A meta-analytic review. J Clin Child Psych. 1997;26:236–246.
   Google Scholar
• Powers E, Witmer H. An Experiment in the Prevention of Delinquency: The Cambridge-Somerville Youth Study. New York: Columbia University Press; 1951.
   Google Scholar
• McCord J. A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. Am Psychologist. 1978;33:284–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dishion TJ, Poulin F, Barraston B. Peer group dynamics associated with iatrogenic effects in group interventions with high-risk young adolescents. New Direct Child Adolesc Dev. 2002:91:79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge KA, Pettit GS, Bates JE, Valente E. Social information processing pattern partially mediate the effect of early physical abuse on later conduct problems. J Ab Psych. 1995;104:632–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin F, Dishion TJ, Burraston B. 3-year iatrogenic effects associated with aggregating high-risk adolescents in cognitive-behavioral preventive interventions. Appl Develop Sci. 2001;5:214–224.
   Google Scholar
• Dishion TJ, Andrews DW, Crosby L. Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. Child Dev. 1995;66:139–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin F, Dishion TJ, Haas E. The peer influence paradox: relationship quality and deviancy training within male adolescent friendship. Merrill-Palmer Quart. 1999;45:42–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dishion TJ, Dodge KA. Peer contagion in interventions for children and adolescents: moving toward an understanding of the ecology and dynamics of change. J Ab Child Psych. 2005;33:395–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman RA, Caplinger TE, Wodarski JS. The St. Louis Conundrum: The Effective Treatment of Antisocial Youths. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney JL, Stattin H, Lord H. Unstructured youth recreation centre participation and antisocial behavior development: Selection influences and the moderating role of antisocial peers. Intl J Behav Dev. 2004;28:553–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang RP, Hughes JN. Differential benefits of skills training with antisocial youth based on group composition: A meta-analytic investigation. Schl Psyc Rev. 2001;31:164–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss B, Caron A, Ball S, Tapp J, Johnson M, Weisz JR. Iatrogenic effects of group treatment for antisocial youth. J Cons Clin Psych. 2005;73:1036–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukhodolsky DN, Kassinove H, Gorman BS. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anger in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Aggr and Violent Behav. 2004;9:247–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey M. The effects of community-based group treatment for delinquency: A meta-analytic search for cross-study generalizations. In: Dodge K, Dishion T, eds. Deviant by Design: Interventions and Policies that Aggregate Deviant Youth and Strategies to Optimize Outcomes. New York: Guilford; 2006:162–184.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminer Y, Burleson JA, Blitz C. Psychotherapies for adolescent substance abusers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;186:684–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters KC, Stinchfield RD, Opland E. The effectiveness of the Minnesota Model approach in the treatment of adolescent drug abusers. Addiction. 2000;95:601–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron HB, Slesnick N, Brody JL, Turner CW. Four-, and seven-month treatment outcomes for adolescent substance-abuse. J Cons Clin Psych. 2001;62:802–813.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminer Y, Burleson JA, Goldberger R. Psychotherapies for adolescent substance abusers: short-and long-term outcomes. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002;190:737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis ML, Godley SH, Diamond G, , et al. Main findings of The Cannabis Youth Treatment randomized field experiment. J Sub Abuse Trt. 2004;27:197–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battjes RJ, Gordon MS, O'Grady KE, , et al. Evaluation of a group-based substance abuse treatment program for adolescents. J Sub Abuse Trt. 2004:27:123–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French MT, Roebuck MC, Dennis ML, , et al. The economic cost of outpatient marijuana treatment for adolescents: findings from a multi-site field experiment. Addiction. 2002;97,Suppl 1:84–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers MG, Brown SA. The adolescent relapse coping questionnaire: psychometric validation. J Studies Alc. 1996;57:40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SA, D'Amico EJ. Treating adolescents together or individually? Issues in adolescent substance abuse interventions. In: O'Leary TA, Brown SA, Colby SK, , et al. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res. 2002;26:890–899.
   Google Scholar
• Petrocelli JV. Effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioral therapy for general symptomatology: A meta-analysis. J Specialists in Group Work. 2002;27:92–115.
   Google Scholar
• Berger RJ, Crowley JE, Gold M, Gray J, Arnold MS. Experiment in Juvenile Court: A Study of a Program of Volunteers Working with Juvenile Probationers. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson GC. Peer group interventions to reduce the risk of delinquent behavior: a selective review and a new evaluation. Criminology. 1987;25:671–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCord J, Widom CS, Crowell NA. Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Justice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey MW. Juvenile delinquency treatment: a meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In: Cook TD, Cooper H, Cordray DS, , et al, eds. Meta-Analysis for Explanation: A Casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1992:83–127.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis ML, Titus JC, Diamond G, , et al. The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) experiment: Rationale, study design, and analysis plans. Addiction. 2002;97:S16–S34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tims FM, Dennis ML, Hamilton N, , et al. Characteristics and problems of 600 adolescent cannabis abusers in outpatient treatment. Addiction. 2002;97:S46–S57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond GS, Godley SH, Liddle HA, , et al. Five outpatient treatment models for adolescent marijuana use: A description of the cannabis youth treatment interventions. Addiction. 2005;97:S70–S83.
   Google Scholar
• French MT, Roebuck MC, Dennis ML, , et al. Outpatient marijuana treatment for adolescents: Economic evaluation of a multisite field experiment. Evaluation Review. 2003;27:421–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampl S, Kadden R. Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET-CBT-5) for Adolescent Cannabis Users. Farmington, CT: University of Connecticut School of Medicine; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Webb C, Scudder M, Kaminer Y, eds. The MCBT5 Supplement: 7 sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT7) for Adolescent Cannabis Users. Farmington, CT: University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Alcohol Research Center; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch L, Hamilton N, Tims F, Angelovich N, McDougall B. CYT: A Multi-Site Study of the Effectiveness of Treatment for Cannabis Dependent Youth: Family Support Network. St. Petersburg, FL: Operation PAR, Inc; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment for Substance-Related Disorders (2nd ed.). Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis ML, Titus JC, White M, Unsicker J, Hodgkins D. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN): Administration Guide for the GAIN and Related Measures. (Version 5 ed.). Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems; 2003. Retrived on 4/6/06 from www.chestnut.org/li/gain.
   Google Scholar
• Shane P, Jasiukaitis P, Green RS. Treatment outcomes among adolescents with substance abuse problems: The relationship between comorbidities and post-treatment substance involvement. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2003;26:393–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS, Inc. SPSS Version 12.0.0. 2003; Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hintze J. NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems. Kaysville, Utah; 2001, www.ncss.com.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold MG, Hughes JN. First do no harm: Adverse effects of grouping deviant youth for skills training. J Schl Psych. 2000;37:99–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge KA. Cost effectiveness of psychotherapy for child aggression: first, is there cost-effectiveness? Group Dynamics: Theory, Res & Prac. 1999;3:275–278.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminer Y. Challenges and opportunities of group therapy for adolescent substance abuse: A critical review. Addict Behav. 2005;30:1765–1774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelovich N, Karvinen T, Panichelli-Mindel S, , et al. The Clinical Management of a Multi-Site Field Trial of Five Outpatient Treatments for Adolescent Substance Abuse. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles JS, Gootman JA. Community Programs to Promote Youth Development. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, Board on Children, Youth, and Families. Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar