Tying Creative Problem-Solving to Social Justice Work in Technical and Professional Communication

References

• Ambrose, D. (2017). Interdisciplinary invigoration of creativity studies. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4), 348–351. doi:10.1002/jocb.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clokie, T. L., & Fourie, E. (2016). Graduate employability and communication competence: Are undergraduates taught relevant skills? Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 442–463. doi:10.1177/2329490616657635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, M. (2022). “Expanding ethical pedagogy in technical communication: learning from killer nanobots”. Technical Communication Quarterly, 31(2), 207–219. doi:10.1080/10572252.2021.1977850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durá, L., Perez, L., & Chaparro, M. (2019). Positive deviance as design thinking: Challenging notions of stasis in technical and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 376–399. doi:10.1177/1050651919854057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. R., & Steptoe-Warren, G. (2018). Humor style clusters: Exploring managerial humor. International Journal of Business Communication, 55(4), 443–454. doi:10.1177/2329488415612478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailey, D., Cox, M., & Loader, E. (2010). Relationship between innovation and professional communication in the “creative” economy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 40(2), 125–141. doi:10.2190/TW.40.2.b
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2022). Exploring the effects of policies promoting political correctness in the workplace. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(4), 1–15. doi:10.1177/2329488419866893
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N., Moore, K. R., & Walton, R. (2016). Disrupting the past to disrupt the future: An antenarrative of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 211–229. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1224655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Looking Forward: The Potential of Creativity for Social Justice and Equity (and Other Exciting Outcomes). The Journal of Creative Behavior, 4, 305–307.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C. (2017a). From the Sylvia Plath effect to social justice: Moving forward with creativity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 173–177. doi:10.5964/ejop.v13i2.1413
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C. (2017b). Looking forward: The potential of creativity for social justice and equity (and other exciting outcomes). The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4), 305–307. doi:10.1002/jocb.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauring, J., & Klitmøller, A. (2017). Inclusive language use in multicultural business organizations: The effect on creativity and performance. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(3), 306–324. doi:10.1177/2329488415572779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marback, R. (2009). Embracing wicked problems: The turn to design in composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), W397–419.
   Google Scholar
• Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2017). Leader talk and the creative spark: A research note on how leader motivating language use influences follower creative environment perceptions. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(2), 210–225. doi:10.1177/2329488416687057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau, C. (2020). Teams that innovate: The language of difference-driven inquiry at the workplace. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 385–408. doi:10.1177/2329490620949864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nganga, L. (2019). Preservice teachers’ perceptions and preparedness to teach for global mindedness and social justice using collaboration, critical thinking, creativity and communication (4cs). Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), 26–57.
   Google Scholar
• Overmyer, T., & Carlson, E. B. (2019). Literature review: Design thinking and place. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 431–436. doi:10.1177/1050651919854079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrone, P. (2018, Dec. 31). The skills companies need most in 2019 – and how to learn them. Retrieved from https://learning.linkedin.com/blog/top-skills/the-skills-companies-need-most-in-2019–and-how-to-learn-them
   Google Scholar
• Pope-Ruark, R., Tham, J., Moses, J., & Conner, T. (2019). Introduction to special issue: Design-thinking approaches in technical and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 370–375. doi:10.1177/1050651919854054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roosevelt, M., & Hussain, S. (2021, August 20). Prop. 22 is ruled unconstitutional, a blow to California gig economy law. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2021-08-20/prop-22-unconstitutional
   Google Scholar
• Sarraf, K. S. (2021). Representations of creativity by posters in freelance writing Internet forums. Technical Communication Quarterly, 31(1), 62–76. doi:10.1080/10572252.2021.1915387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. (2019). Creativity as dissent and resistance: Transformative approach premised on social justice agenda. In I. Lebuda & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of social creativity research (pp. 431–445). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Kitalong, K. S. (2015). Influences on creativity in technical communication: Invention, motivation, and constraints. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(3), 199–216. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.1043028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar