Reddit and Engaged Science Communication Online: An Examination of Reddit’s R/Science Ask-Me-Anythings and Science Discussion Series

References

• Auken, S. (2021). Genres inside genres. A short theory of embedded genre. Discourse and Writing/rédactologie, 31, 163–178. doi:10.31468/dwr.883
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowdon, M. A. (2014). Tweeting an ethos: Emergency messaging, social media, and teaching technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 35–54. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.850853
   Google Scholar
• Bray, N. (2019). How do online news genres take up knowledge claims from a scientific research article on climate change? Written Communication, 36(1), 155–189. doi:10.1177/0741088318804822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centivany, A., & Glushko, B. (2016). ‘Popcorn tastes good’: Participatory policymaking and reddit’s ‘AMAgeddon.’ In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). doi:10.1145/2858036.2858516
   Google Scholar
• Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 47–62. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00026-4
   Google Scholar
• Connor, U., Upton, T. A., & Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Introduction to move analysis. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (pp. 23–41). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, A. (2021). Genre uptake as boundary-work: Reasoning about uptake in Wikipedia articles. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(2), 175–198. doi:10.1177/0047281620906150
   Google Scholar
• Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation, 62(4), 428–446. doi:10.1108/00220410610700953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVasto, D., & Creighton, J. (2018). Inspired by the cosmos: Strategies for public engagement in nonpolicy contexts. Science Communication, 40(6), 808–818. doi:10.1177/1075547018792572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, H., & Zhang, J. (2010). Social media and participatory risk communication during the H1N1 flu epidemic: A comparative study of the United States and China. China Media Research, 6(4), 80–91.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, B. L. (1997). The biomedical discussion section in context. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J. (1986). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 15(3), 330–350. doi:10.1177/0741088398015003006
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J. (2020). Rhetorical citizenship and the science of science communication. Argumentation 34(3), 371–387. 10.1007/s10503-019-09499-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freddi, M. (2020). Blurring the lines between genre and audiences: Interaction in science blogs. Discourse and Interaction, 13(2), 9–35. doi:10.5817/DI2020-2-9
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S. (2021). Misinformation inoculation and literacy support tweetorials on COVID-19. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 7–14. doi:10.1506/51920958505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S., & Whalen, B. (2008). Mode, medium, and genre: A case study of decisions in new-media design. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(1), 65–91. doi:10.1177/1050651907307709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, A. G. (1994). The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science, 3(1), 3–23. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/3/1/001
   Google Scholar
• Gross, A. G., & Harmon, J. E. (2016). The internet revolution in the sciences and humanities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hara, N., Abbazio, J., Perkins, K., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2019). An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask me anything (AMA) sessions on reddit r/science. Plos One, 14(5), e0216789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693–722. doi:10.2307/3587930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., & Radin, J. (2011). Bounding an emerging technology: Para-scientific media and the Drexler-Smalley debate about nanotechnology. Social Studies of Science, 41(4), 457–485. doi:10.1177/0306312711402722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, D., Wang, D., Calvano, J., Raja, A. S., He, S., & Fu, K. W. (2020). Addressing immediate public coronavirus (COVID-19) concerns through social media: Utilizing reddit’s AMA as a framework for public engagement with science. Plos One, 15(10), e0240326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt, A., & Robinson, J. J. (2017). The role of information visibility in network gatekeeping: Information aggregation on reddit during crisis events. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 1246–1261. doi:10.1145/2998181.2998299
   Google Scholar
• Leshner, A. I. (2006). Science and public engagement. The Chronicle Review, 53(8), B20. https://www.chronicle.com/article/SciencePublic-Engagement/25084
   Google Scholar
• Luzón, M. J. (2013). Public communication of science in blogs: Recontextualizing scientific discourse for a diversified audience. Written Communication, 30(4), 428–457. doi:10.1177/0741088313493610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzón, M. J. (2022). Coronavirus explainers’ for public communication of science: Everything the public needs to know. In A. Musolff, R. Breeze, K. Kondo, & S. Vilar-Lluch (Eds.), Pandemic and Crisis Discourse: Communicating COVID-19 and Public Health Strategy (pp. 97–114). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Luzón, M. J., & Pérez-Llantada, C. (2022). Digital genres in academic knowledge production and communication. Jackson, TN: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. doi:10.11613/BM.2012.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehlenbacher, A. R. (2017). Crowdfunding science: Exigencies and strategies in an emerging genre of science communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(2), 127–144. doi:10.1080/10572252.2017.1287361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehlenbacher, A. R. (2019). Science communication online: Engaging experts and publics on the internet. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehlenbacher, A. R., & Miller, C. R. (2018). Intersections: Scientific and parascientific communication on the internet. In R. A. Harris (Ed.), Landmark essays on the rhetoric of science: Case studies (2nd ed., pp. 239–260). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. doi:10.1080/00335638409383686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R., & Fahnestock, J. (2013). Genres in scientific and technical rhetoric. Poroi, 9(1), 1–4. doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1161
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, D., & Mehlenbacher, A. R. (2019). The coaxing architecture of reddit’s r/science: Adopting ethos-assessment heuristics to evaluate science experts on the internet. Social Epistemology, 33(6), 514–524. doi:10.1080/02691728.2019.1637964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, G. (2003). Discourse studies of scientific popularization: Questioning the boundaries. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 265–279. doi:10.1177/1461445603005002006nallen
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nallen. (2018). R/Science - r/science will no longer be hosting AMAs [Subreddit news]. https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/8khscc/rscience_will_no_longer_be_hosting_amas/
   Google Scholar
• The new reddit journal of science. (n.d.). https://www.reddit.com/r/science/
   Google Scholar
• Nwogu, K. N. (1991). Structure of science popularizations: A genre-analysis approach to the schema of popularized medical texts. English for Specific Purposes, 10(2), 111–123. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(91)90004-G
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S. (2014). The world’s largest 2-way dialogue between scientists and the public. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-world-s-largest-2-way-dialogue-between-scientists-and-the-public/
   Google Scholar
• p1percub. (2018). R/science - science discussion: We are researchers at caltech working with professor Frances Arnold, one of the recipients of the 2018 Nobel prize in chemistry [archived discussion thread]. https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/9myt6l/science_discussion_we_are_researchers_at_caltech/e7iojq0
   Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder, E. H. (2017). Reddit’s “explain like I’m five”: Technical descriptions in the wild. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 25–41. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1257741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder, E. H., & Mahmou-Werndli, A. (2021). Impacts of genre and access on science discussions: ‘The new reddit journal of science’. Journal of Science Communication, 20(5), A04. doi:10.22323/2.20050204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019). Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(16), 7662–7669. doi:10.1073/pnas.1805871115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Science AMA series submission guide. (n.d.). https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3fzgHAW-mVZdnBKaHhCM1RlMFU/edit
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, R. P. (2020). Gaming reddit’s algorithm: R/the_Donald, amplification, and the rhetoric of sorting. Computers and Composition, 56(102572), 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102572
   Google Scholar
• Smart, G. (2016). Discourse coalitions, science blogs, and the public debate on global climate change. In M. J. Reiff & A. Bawarshi (Eds.), Genre and the performance of publics (pp. 157–177). Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The top 500 sites on the web. (n.d.). https://www.alexa.com/topsites
   Google Scholar
• Tracking the top 5000 subreddits. (n.d.). http://www.redditlist.com
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, P. (2021, May 21). How reddit killed one of its most popular AMAs. https://www.dailydot.com/debug/reddit-r-science-ama
   Google Scholar
• Walwema, J. (2021). The WHO health alert: Communicating a global pandemic with WhatsApp. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 35–40. doi:10.1177/1050651920958507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (2021). Genre change in the online context: Responding to negative online reviews and redefining an effective genre construct on Amazon.Com. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(3), 297–332. doi:10.1177/10506519211001113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, E. (2020, July 7). The pandemic experts are not okay. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/07/pandemic-experts-are-not-okay/613879/
   Google Scholar