L-space knots with tunnel number >1 by experiment

References

• Auckly, D. (2014). Two-fold branched covers. J. Knot Theory Ramif. 23(3):1430001, 29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, B. A., Budney, R., Pettersson, W., Goerner, M., Gowty, A., C. Haraway, III, R., He, A., Letscher, D., Zhang, K., Bruns, W., (1999–2020). Regina: Software for low-dimensional topology. Available at: http://regina-normal.github.io/.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, J. (2018). Heegaard3: a program for studying Heegaard splittings. Available at: http://bitbucket.org/t3m/heegaard3.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, K. L., Kegel, M., McCoy, D. (2020). The search for alternating and quasi-alternating surgeries on asymmetric knots, In progress, December.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, K. L., Luecke, J. (2020). Asymmetric L–space knots. Geom. Topol. 24(5): 2287–2359, arXiv:1710.01655v1 [math.GT]. doi:10.2140/gt.2020.24.2287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, K. L., Motegi, K. Twist families of L-space knots, their genera, and Seifert surgeries, arXiv:1506.04455v2 [math.GT], to appear in Comm. Anal. Geom.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, K. L., Moore, A. H. (2018). Montesinos knots, Hopf plumbings, and L-space surgeries. J. Math. Soc. Japan. 70(1): 95–110, arXiv:1404.7585v1 [math.GT]. doi:10.2969/jmsj/07017484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, P. J., Dean, J. C., Weeks, J. R. (1999). The simplest hyperbolic knots. J. Knot Theory Ramif. 8(3): 279–297. doi:10.1142/S0218216599000195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champanerkar, A., Kofman, I., Mullen, T. (2014). The 500 simplest hyperbolic knots, J. Knot Theory Ramif. 23(12): 1450055, 34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champanerkar, A., Kofman, I., Patterson, E. (2004). The next simplest hyperbolic knots. J. Knot Theory Ramif. 13(7): 965–987. doi:10.1142/S021821650400355X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Computop Group. (2020). Computop SageMath Docker Image. Available at: https://hub.docker.com/r/computop/sage.
   Google Scholar
• Culler, M., Dunfield, N. M., Goerner, M., Weeks, J. R. SnapPy, a computer program for studying the geometry and topology of 3-manifolds, (29/07/2019). Available at: http://snappy.computop.org.
   Google Scholar
• Dean (2003). Small Seifert-fibered Dehn surgery on hyperbolic knots. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 3: 435–472. doi:10.2140/agt.2003.3.435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunfield, N. M. A census of exceptional Dehn fillings, arXiv:1812.11940v1 [math.GT].
   Google Scholar
• Dunfield, N. M. Floer homology, group orderability, and taut foliations of hyperbolic 3-manifolds, arXiv:1904.04628v1 [math.GT].
   Google Scholar
• Franks, J., Williams, R. F. (1987). Braids and the Jones polynomial. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 303(1): 97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiggini, P. (2008). Knot Floer homology detects genus-one fibred knots. Amer. J. Math. 130(5): 1151–1169, arXiv:math/0603445v3 [math.GT].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedden, M. (2005). On knot Floer homology and cabling. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 5: 1197–1222, arXiv:math/0406402v2 [math.GT]. doi:10.2140/agt.2005.5.1197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedden, M. (2010). Notions of positivity and the Ozsváth-Szabó concordance invariant. J. Knot Theory Ramif. 19(5): 617–629, arXiv:math/0509499v1 [math.GT]. doi:10.1142/S0218216510008017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedden, M., Watson, L. (2018). On the geography and botany of knot Floer homology. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 24(2): 997–1037, arXiv:1404.6913v3 [math.GT]. doi:10.1007/s00029-017-0351-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedden, M., Watson, L. (2018). On the geography and botany of knot Floer homology. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 24(2): 997–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hom, J., Lipschitz, R., Ruberman, D. (2017). Thirty years of Floer theory for 3-manifolds. Available at: https://www.birs.ca/cmo-workshops/2017/17w5011/report17w5011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hoste, J., Thistlethwaite, M., Weeks, J. (1998). The first 1,701,936 knots. Math. Intell. 20(4): 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, T. (1984). Structures of the Haken manifolds with Heegaard splittings of genus two. Osaka J. Math. 21(2): 437–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruey, C., Lee, S., Vafaee, F. On 3-braids and L-space knots, unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, H. R. (1986). Seifert circles and knot polynomials. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 99(1): 107–109.
   Google Scholar
• Motegi, K. (2016). L-space surgery and twisting operation. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 16(3): 17271772. Available at: arXiv:1405.6487v3 [math.GT]. doi:10.2140/agt.2016.16.1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, Y. (2007). Knot Floer homology detects fibred knots. Invent. Math. 170(3): 577608. Available at: arXiv:math/0607156v4 [math.GT]. doi:10.1007/s00222-007-0075-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozsváth, P., Szabó, Z. (2004). Holomorphic disks and genus bounds. Geom. Topol. 8: 311–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozsváth, P., Szabó, Z. (2005). On knot Floer homology and lens space surgeries. Topology 44(6):1281–1300, arXiv:math/0303017v2 [math.GT]. doi:10.1016/j.top.2005.05.001
   Google Scholar
• The Pandas development team. (2020). pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas. Available at: 10.5281/zenodo.3509134.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfsen, D. (1984). Rational surgery calculus: extension of Kirby’s theorem. Pacific J. Math. 110(2):377–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenton, F. KLO (Knot-Like Objects), (29/07/2019). Available at: http://KLO-Software.net.
   Google Scholar
• The Sage Developers. (2020). SageMath, the Sage Mathematics Software System, Version 9.1. Available at: https://www.sagemath.org.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rossum, G., Drake, F. L. (2009). Python 3 reference manual, Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace.
   Google Scholar