A Numerical Scheme for Fast and High Accuracy Simulation of Motion-Induced Eddy Current Testing Signals

References

• Xiao CY, Zhang YH. A method of magnetic scanning imaging for detecting defects in ferromagnetic materials. Meas Sci Technol. 2011;22(2):025503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng B, Kang Y, Sun Y. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation of the feasibility of inspecting nonferromagnetic conductors by an MFL testing apparatus. Res Nondestruct Eval. 2015;27(2):100–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguila-Muñoz J, Espina-Hernández JH, Pérez-Benítez JA, et al. A magnetic perturbation GMR-based probe for the nondestructive evaluation of surface cracks in ferromagnetic steels. NDT E Int. 2016;79:132–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Y, Zeng L, Lin J, et al. Trailing pulses self-focusing for ultrasonic-based damage detection in thick plates. Mech Syst Signal Pr. 2019;119:420–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Tian GY, Ward S. Numerical simulation on magnetic flux leakage evaluation at high speed. NDT E Int. 2006;39(5):367–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama K, Hoshikawa H. Influence of speed effect in eddy current nondestructive testing. Nondestruct Test Eval. 1992;7(1–6):73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Yu Y, Wang W, et al. A novel probe of DC electromagnetic NDT based on drag effect: design and application in crack characterization of high-speed moving ferromagnetic material. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2021;70:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Sun Y, Udpa L, et al. 3D simulation of velocity induced fields for nondestructive evaluation application. IEEE Trans Magn. 1999;35(3):1754–1756. DOI:10.1109/20.767369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Yu Y, Li L, et al. Investigation of DC electromagnetic-based motion induced eddy current on ndt for crack detection. IEEE Sens J. 2021;21(6):7449–7457. DOI:10.1109/JSEN.2021.3049551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffa A, Maday Y, Rapetti F. Calculation of eddy currents in moving structures by a sliding mesh-finite element method. IEEE Trans Magn. 2000;36(4):1356–1359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen N, Lai HC, Rodger D, et alP.J.Leonard NAHCLDRa. On the validity of two A-ψ finite element formulations for modelling eddy current problems with velocity. IEEE Trans Magn. 1998;34(5):2535–2538. doi: 10.1109/20.717584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodger D, Eastham JF. Characteristics of a linear induction tachometer - a 3d moving conductor eddy-current problem. IEEE Trans Magn. 1985;21(6):2412–2415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax M, Nelson DF. Maxwell equations in material form. Phys Rev B. 1976;13(4):1777–1784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer H, Ziolkowski M. Motion-induced eddy current testing. In: Ida N Meyendorf N, editors. Handbook of advanced non-destructive evaluation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 781–825.
   Google Scholar
• Qiao L, Chen HE, Wang M, et al. Numerical simulation methods for motion-induced eddy current testing signals based on Ar formulation and edge finite elements. NDT E Int. 2022;129:102651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie S, Chen Z, Takagi T, et al. Development of a very fast simulator for pulsed eddy current testing signals of local wall thinning. NDT E Int. 2012;51:45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang HY, Takagi T, Fukutomi H. Fast signal predictions of noised signals in eddy current testing. IEEE Trans Magn. 2000;36(4):1719–1723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi T, Huang H, Fukutomi H. Numerical evaluation of correlation between crack size and eddy current testing signal by a very fast simulator. IEEE Trans Magn. 1998;34(5):2581–2584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedelec JC. Mixed finite elements in ℝ3. Numer Math. 1980;35(3):315–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanese R, Rubinacci G. Solution of three dimensional eddy current problems by integral and differential methods. IEEE Trans Magn. 1988;24(1):98–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanese R, Rubinacci G. Magnetostatic field computations in terms of two‐component vector potentials. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 1990;29(3):515–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bíró O, Valli A. The coulomb gauged vector potential formulation for the eddy-current problem in general geometry: well-posedness and numerical approximation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2007;196(13–16):1890–1904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusa N, Chen Z, Miya K, et al. Large-scale parallel computation for the reconstruction of natural stress corrosion cracks from eddy current testing signals. NDT E Int. 2003;36(7):449–459. DOI:10.1016/S0963-8695(03)00067-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian GY, Sophian A. Defect classification using a new feature for pulsed eddy current sensors. NDT E Int. 2005;38(1):77–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim AV, Buck JR, Schafer RW. Discrete-time signal processing. Vol. 2. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Miya K. ECT inversion using a knowledge-based forward solver. J Nondestr Eval. 1998;17(3):167–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Miya K, Kurokawa M. Rapid prediction of eddy current testing signals using A-phi method and database. NDT E Int. 1999;32(1):29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng W, Miya K, Chen Z. Reconstruction of cracks with multiple eddy current coils using a database approach. J Nondestr Eval. 1999;18(4):149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Yusa N, Miya K. Some advances in numerical analysis techniques for quantitative electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation. Nondestruct Test Eval. 2009;24(1–2):69–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H, Takagi T, Uchimoto T. Fast numerical calculation for crack modeling in eddy current testing of ferromagnetic materials. J Appl Phys. 2003;94(9):5866–5872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar