51
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

References

  • Ali, M. 2017. Curriculum development for sustainability education. Bandung, Indonesia: UPI Press.
  • Altbach, P. G., and J. Knight. 2007. The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education 11 (3-4):290–305. doi:10.1177/1028315307303542.
  • Baran, E., A. Correia, and A. Thompson. 2011. Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education 32 (3):421–39. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.610293.
  • Bartels-Hardege, H. 2018. Evaluating the transition experience of former foundation year students to postgraduate studies. Journal of the Foundation Year Network 1:95–101.
  • Bascia, N., S. Carr-Harris, R. Fine-Meyer, and C. Zurzolo. 2014. Teachers, curriculum innovation, and policy formation. Curriculum Inquiry 44 (2):228–48. doi:10.1111/curi.12044.
  • Brew, A., and L. Mantai. 2017. Academics’ perceptions of the challenges and barriers to implementing research-based experiences for undergraduates. Teaching in Higher Education 22 (5):551–68. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1273216.
  • Bridle, H., A. Vrieling, M. Cardillo, Y. Araya, and L. Hinojosa. 2013. Preparing for interdisciplinary future: A perspective from early-career researchers. Futures 53:22–32. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2013.09.003.
  • British Council 2023. UK TNE in East Asia post pandemic. London: British Council.
  • British Council and China Education Association for International Exchange. 2017. Research on current UK-China transnational education: From the perspective of administrators and students. London: British Council.
  • Brydon-Miller, M. 2017. Critical learning, community, and engagement: Elements for creating positive learning environments and opportunities for positive change. Educational Action Research 26 (3):351–3. doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1469651.
  • Cambridge English and Study Portals. 2015. New routes to higher education: the global rise of foundation programmes. Cambridge English and Study Portals, Cambridge, UK and Eindhoven, Netherlands. www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/pathways-report-2015.pdf
  • Casasanto, D. 2014. Development of metaphorical thinking: The role of language. In Language and the creative mind, ed. M. Borkent, J. Hinnell, and B. Dancygier, 3–18. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  • Cha, M., and W. Chang. 2009. Learning through working: A case study of Chinese college students in South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 29 (3):311–20. doi:10.1080/02188790903092803.
  • Cleary, T. J., L. Dembitzer, and R. J. Kettler. 2015. Internal factor structure and convergent validity evidence: The self-report version of self-regulation strategy inventory. Psychology in the Schools 52 (9):829–44. doi:10.1002/pits.21866.
  • Clifford, M. 2018. Are foundation year courses value for money? Journal of the Foundation Year Network 1:161–74.
  • Cohen, S., and J. Jurkovic. 1997. Learning from a masterpiece. Training and Development 51 (11):66–70.
  • Cross, R. 2016. Language and content ‘integration’: The affordances of additional languages as a tool within a single curriculum space. Journal of Curriculum Studies 48 (3):388–408. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1125528.
  • Derounian, J. 2017. Inspirational teaching in higher education: What does it look, sound and feel like? An exploratory research study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 11 (1):9. doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110109.
  • Dumont, H., F. Istance, and F. Benavides. 2010. The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Eaves, M. 2011. The relevance of learning styles for international pedagogy in higher education. Teachers and Teaching 17 (6):677–91. doi:10.1080/13540602.2011.625143.
  • Ellet, W. 2007. The case study handbook: How to read, discuss, and write persuasively about cases. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Gibbs, G. 1998. Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning. London: Further Educational Unit.
  • Gidley, J. M. 2012. Evolution of education: From weak signals to rich imaginaries of educational futures. Futures 44 (1):46–54. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.08.006.
  • Grimshaw, T. 2007. Problematizing the construct of the ‘Chinese Learner’: Insights from ethnographic research. Educational Studies 33 (3):299–311. doi:10.1080/03055690701425643.
  • Hale, S. 2018. Surveying the foundations: The purposes of assessment at foundation level and how best to achieve them. Journal of the Foundation Year Network 1:63–9.
  • Healey, M., A. Flint, and K. Harrington. 2016. Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 4 (2):8–20.
  • Ivanitskaya, L., D. Clark, G. Montgomery, and R. Primeau. 2002. Interdisciplinary learning: Process and outcomes. Innovative Higher Education 27 (2):95–111. doi:10.1023/A:1021105309984.
  • Jacob, W. J., and W. Xiong. 2016. Higher education capacity for what? Balancing issues of equity, efficiency, choice, and excellence. In The Palgrave Handbook of Asia Pacific Higher Education, ed. C. S. Collins, M. N. Lee, J. N. Hawkins, and D. Neubauer, 345–63. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jantsch, E. 1972. Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities, ed. L. Apostel, 97–121. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Jones, J., S. Fleischer, A. Mcnair, and R. Masika. 2020. The international foundation year and first year transition: Building capital, evolving habitus, developing belonging, preparing for success. Teaching in Higher Education 25 (1):36–51. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1541879.
  • Kairisto-Mertanen, L., T. Penttilä, and J. Nuotio. 2011. Defining innovation competence – the learning outcomes of innovation pedagogy. Innovations for Competence Management, Conference Proceedings, Series C Articles, Part 84, In ed. I. Torniainen, S. Mahlamäki-Kultanen, P. Nokelainen, and P. Ilsley, 25–33. Lahti: Esa Print Oy.
  • Keinänen, M. M., and L. Kairisto-Mertanen. 2019. Researching learning environments and students’ innovation competences. Education + Training 61 (1):17–30. doi:10.1108/ET-03-2018-0064.
  • Kift, S., K. Nelson, and J. Clarke. 2010. Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE – A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education 1 (1):1–20. doi:10.5204/intjfyhe.v1i1.13.
  • Kift, S. 2015. A decade of Transition Pedagogy: A quantum leap in conceptualizing the first year experience. HERDSA Review of Higher Education 2:51–86.
  • Knight, J., and J. Mcnamara. 2017. Transnational education: A classification framework and data collection guidelines for international programme and provider mobility. London and Bonn: British Council and DAAD.
  • Kolb, D. 1984. Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Ha, P. L., and B. Li. 2014. Silence as right, choice, resistance and strategy among Chinese ‘Me Generation’ students: Implications for pedagogy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 35 (2):233–48.
  • Lee, M. N. N. 2016. Regional trends in Asian higher education. In The Palgrave Handbook of Asia Pacific Higher Education, ed. C. S., Collins, M. N., Lee, J. N., Hawkins, and D. Neubauer, 129–39. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Leidner, D. E., and S. L. Jarvenpaa. 1995. The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. Mis Quarterly 19 (3):265–91. doi:10.2307/249596.
  • Liu, S. 2006. Developing China’s future managers: Learning from the West. Education + Training 48 (1):6–14. doi:10.1108/00400910610645699.
  • Li, L., and R. Wegerif. 2014. What does it mean to teach thinking in China? Challenging and developing notions of “Confucian Education. Thinking Skills and Creativity 11:22–32. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.09.003.
  • Lomer, S. 2017. Recruiting international students in higher education representations and rationales in British policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lomer, S., and L. Anthony-Okeke. 2019. Ethically engaging international students: Student generated material in an active blended learning model. Teaching in Higher Education 24 (5):613–32. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1617264.
  • Lyons, P., and R. P. Bandura. 2020. Skills needs, integrative pedagogy and case-based instruction. Journal of Workplace Learning 32 (7):473–87. doi:10.1108/JWL-12-2019-0140.
  • Masika, R., and J. Jones. 2016. Building student belonging and engagement: Insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education 21 (2):138–50. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1122585.
  • Mathieson, S. 2019. Integrating research, teaching and practice in the context of new institutional policies: A social practice approach. Higher Education 78 (5):799–815. doi:10.1007/s10734-019-00371-x.
  • Matthews, D. 2014. Paths to profit. Times Higher Education, March 20. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/pathways-to-profit/2012075.article.
  • Matthews, K. E., A. Dwyer, L. Hine, and J. Turner. 2018. Conceptions of students as partners. Higher Education 76 (6):957–71. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0257-y.
  • McGonigal, J. 2004. Interactive or dialogic teaching? The case of the ‘inspirational’ teacher. Westminster Studies in Education 27 (2):115–26. doi:10.1080/0140672042000277071.
  • Miani, M. 2020. Using instructional design to engage students in the development of educational experiences: The case of multimedia case studies. In Meeting the Teaching and Learning Challenges in 21st Century Higher Education: Universal Design, ed. T. Byrom. 84–95. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Miani, M. 2023. Making sense of brainstorming in transnational education: The challenge of contextualization. In Handbook of Research on Developments and Future Trends in Transnational Higher Education, eds. G.R. Morris and L. Li, 21–38. Hershey, PA: IGI.
  • Miani, M., and S. Picucci-Huang. 2024. Collaborative transnational education in China: A scoping review of emerging research trajectories (2016–2023). Chinese Education & Society 56 (5–6). doi:10.1080/10611932.2024.2303913.
  • Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mochizuki, Y., and A. Bryan. 2015. Climate change education in the contexts of education for sustainable development: Rational and principles. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 9 (1):4–26. doi:10.1177/0973408215569109.
  • Mok, M. C., J. K. Kennedy, P. J. Moore, P. W. J. Shan, and S. O. Leung. 2008. The use of help seeking by Chinese secondary students: Challenging the myth of ‘the Chinese learner.’ Evaluation and Research in Education 21 (3):188–213.
  • Monteiro, F., C. Leite, and C. Rocha. 2019. Ethical education as a pillar of the future role of higher education: Analysing its presence in the curricula of engineering courses. Futures 111:168–80. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.02.004.
  • Moon, J. 1999. Reflection in learning and professional development. London: Kogan Page.
  • Moula, Z. 2021. Academic perceptions of barriers and facilitators of creative pedagogies in higher education: A cross-cultural study between the UK and China. Thinking Skills and Creativity 41:100923. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100923.
  • Nguyen, P. C. 2021. Teaching mathematics through interdisciplinary projects: A case study of Vietnam. International Journal of Education and Practice 9 (4):656–69.
  • O'Donnell, M., M. Wallace, A. Melano, R. Lawson, and E. Leinonen. 2015. Putting transition at the centre of whole-of-curriculum transformation. Student Success 6 (2):73–9. doi:10.5204/ssj.v6i2.295.
  • O’Donnell, V. L. 2016. Organisational change and development towards inclusive higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 8 (1):101–18.
  • OECD. 2018. What does innovation in pedagogy look like? Teaching in Focus 21. Paris: OECD.
  • Office for Students. 2019. Preparing for degree study. Analysis of access to higher education diplomas and integrated foundation year courses. London: Office for Students.
  • Orsmond, P., and S. Merry. 2017. Tutors’ assessment practices and students’ situated learning in higher education: Chalk and cheese. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2):289–303. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1103366.
  • O'Sullivan, K., N. Bird, J. Robson, and N. Winters. 2019. Academic identity, confidence and belonging: The role of contextualized admissions and foundation years in higher education. British Educational Research Journal 45 (3):554–75. doi:10.1002/berj.3513.
  • Rahardja, U., T. Hariguna, and Q. Aini. 2019. Understanding the impact of determinants in game learning acceptance: An empirical study. International Journal of Education and Practice 7 (3):136–45. doi:10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.136.145.
  • Robinson, K., and L. Aronica. 2009. The element: How finding your passion changes everything. London: Penguin Books.
  • Sachs, J., and L. Clark. 2017. Imagining a curriculum for an engaged university. In Learning through community engagement, ed. J. Sachs, and L. Clark, 81–97. Singapore: Springer.
  • Sanders, L., and A. Daly. 2013. Building a successful foundation? The role of foundation year courses in preparing students for their degree. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning 14 (1):42–56. doi:10.5456/WPLL.14.S.42.
  • Sanger, C. S. 2016. Diversity, inclusion, and context in Asian higher education. In The Palgrave Handbook of Asia Pacific Higher Education, ed. C. S. Collins, M. N. N. Lee, J. N. Hawkins, and D. E. Neubauer, 1–30. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sanger, C. S. 2020. Diversity, inclusion, and context in Asian higher education. In Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education, ed. C.S. Sanger and N. Gleason, 1–28. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Shams, F., and J. Huisman. 2016. The role of institutional dual embeddedness in the strategic local adaptation of international branch campuses: Evidence from Malaysia and Singapore. Studies in Higher Education 41 (6):955–70. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.966669.
  • Smits, A. E. H. 2012. Ontwerp en implementatie van de masteropleiding Special Educational Needs via e-learning [Design and implementation of the master Special Educational Needs through e-learning]. Doctoral diss., Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente.
  • Snyman, W. D., and J. Kroon. 2005. Vertical and horizontal integration of knowledge and skills - a working model. European Journal of Dental Education: Official Journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe 9 (1):26–31. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2004.00355.x.
  • Stoller, A. 2017. Critical inquiry and the first year: Reconceptualizing the aims of transitions pedagogies. The Journal of General Education 66 (3-4):99–113. doi:10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0099.
  • Sun, Y., N. Li, J. L. Hao, L. di Sarno, and L. Wang. 2022. Post-COVID-19 development of transnational education in China: Challenges and opportunities. Education Sciences 12 (6):416. doi:10.3390/educsci12060416.
  • Sweeney, A., S. Weaven, and C. Herington. 2008. Multicultural influences on group learning: A qualitative higher education study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2):119–32. doi:10.1080/02602930601125665.
  • Thomas, L. 2012. Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: Final report from what works? Student retention and success programme. Higher Education Academy (HEA) 59 (1):3–8.
  • Tynjälä, P. 2013. Toward a 3-P model of workplace learning: A literature review. Vocations and Learning 6 (1):11–36. doi:10.1007/s12186-012-9091-z.
  • Tynjälä, P., A. Virtanen, U. Klemola, E. Kostiainen, and H. Rasku-Puttonen. 2016. Developing social competence and other social skills in teacher education: applying the model of integrative pedagogy. European Journal of Teacher Education 39 (3):368–87. doi:10.1080/02619768.2016.1171314.
  • UNESCO. 2016. Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning. Paris: UNESCO.
  • UNESCO. 2017. Education for Sustainable Development Goals - Learning Objectives. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Volkov, A., and M. Volkov. 2015. Teamwork benefits in tertiary education: Student perceptions that lead to best practice assessment design. Education + Training 57 (3):262–78. doi:10.1108/ET-02-2013-0025.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. 2012. Thought and language. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Wahlström, N., and D. Sundberg. 2018. Transnational curriculum standards and classroom practices: The new meaning of teaching, Abingdon Oxon: Routledge.
  • Wang, J., and N. Rao. 2022. What do Chinese students say about their academic motivational goals—reasons underlying academic strivings? Asia Pacific Journal of Education 42 (2):245–59. doi:10.1080/02188791.2020.1812513.
  • Wenger, E. 2000. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7 (2):225–46. doi:10.1177/135050840072002.
  • Wheeler, E. 2018. Foundations of a bricolage method: Using learning stories for the co- production of curriculum design, impacting experiences of learning difference within higher education. Journal of the Foundation Year Network 1:37–49.
  • Wiles, J., and J. C. Bondi. 2007. Curriculum development. A guide to practice. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Wilkins, S., and C. A. Annabi. 2021. Academic careers in transnational higher education: The rewards and challenges of teaching at international branch campuses. Journal of Studies in International Education 27 (2):219–39. doi:10.1177/10283153211052782.
  • Wu, Z. 2011. Interpretation, autonomy, and transformation: Chinese pedagogic discourse in a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies 43 (5):569–90. doi:10.1080/00220272.2011.577812.
  • Zhang, Z., and R. Heydon. 2016. The changing landscape of literacy curriculum in a Sino-Canada transnational education programme: An actor-network theory informed case study. Journal of Curriculum Studies 48 (4):547–64. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1090626.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.