The Political Evolution of Mental Health Parity

REFERENCES

• Goldman H H, Sharfstein S S, Frank R G. Equity and parity in psychiatric care. Psychiatr Ann 1983; 12: 488–91, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Frank R G, Koyanagi C, McGuire T G. The politics and economics of mental health parity laws. Health Aff 1997; 16: 108–20, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Ridgely M S, Goldman H H. Mental health insurance. Handbook on mental health policy in the United States, D A Rochefort. Greenwood, Westport, CT 1989; 341–62
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. American Psychiatric Association state issues handbook. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC 1987
   Google Scholar
• McGuire T G, Montgomery J T. Mandated mental health benefits in private health insurance. J Health Polit Policy Law 1982; 7: 380–406, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Lambert D A, McGuire T G. Political and economic determinants of insurance regulation in mental health. J Health Polit Policy Law 1982; 15: 169–85, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Hustead E, Sharfstein S S, Muszinski S, Brady J, Cahill J. Reductions in coverage for mental and nervous illness in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program 1980–1984. Am J Psychiatry 1985; 142: 181–6, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Hustead E C, Sharfstein S S. Utilization and cost of mental illness coverage in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, 1973. Am J Psychiatry 1978; 135: 315–9, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• National Alliance for the Mentally Ill. State Mental Illness Parity Laws: Chart of the States, At http://www.nami.org/parity/
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association Division of Government Relations. State of the states: parity laws. APA, Washington, DC 2003
   Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures. State laws mandating or regulating mental health benefits. 2006, http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/mentalben.htm
   Google Scholar
• National Mental Health Association. What have states done to ensure health insurance parity?. 2002, http://www.nmha.org/state/parity/state_parity.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Peck M C, Scheffler R M. An analysis of definitions of mental illness used in state parity laws. Psychiatr Serv 2002; 53: 1089–95, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arons B S, Frank R G, Goldman H H, McGuire T G, Stephens S. Mental health and substance abuse coverage under health reform. Health Aff 1994; 13: 192–205, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Frank R G, McGuire T G. Estimating costs of mental health and substance abuse coverage. Health Aff 1995; 14: 102–15, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyanagi C. The Politics of mental health parity [Slide presentation]. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School. April 18, 2001
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office. Mental Health Parity Act: despite new federal standards, mental health benefits remain limited. GAO, Washington, DC 2000, [Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-00-05]. http://www.gao.gov/archive/2000/he00095.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flynn William E. Statement before Senate Committee on Health. Education, Labor and Pensions. July 11, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner F R, Jones B D. Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL 1993
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner F R, Jones Jones B D. Agenda dynamic and policy subsystems. J Polit 1991; 53: 1044–74, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America. Feb., 232006, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9235
   Google Scholar
• Cutler C M. Testimony on behalf of American Association of Health Plans before Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce U. S. House of Representatives. July, 232002
   Google Scholar
• Trautwein E N. Testimony on behalf of National Association of Manufacturers before Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce U. S. House of Representatives. July, 232002
   Google Scholar
• Regier D A. Testimony on behalf of American Psychiatric Association before Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce U. S. House of Representatives. July, 232002
   Google Scholar
• Bowman J, Hagen S. CBO's estimate of S. 543. The Mental Health Equitable Treatment Act of 2001. Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC 2002
   Google Scholar
• Nystul K. Testimony before Subcommittee on Employer-Employee Relations of the Committee on Education and Workforce U. S. House of Representatives. March, 132002
   Google Scholar
• Hackett J. Testimony before Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce U. S. House of Representatives. July, 232002
   Google Scholar
• Bilirakis M. Remarks during hearing of Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce U. S. House of Representatives. July, 232002
   Google Scholar
• Newhouse JP. Free for All? Lessons from the RAND health insurance experiment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1993
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Congressional Budget Office. CBO's estimates of the impact on employers of the Mental Health Parity Amendment in H.R. 3101. CBO, Washington, DC 1996
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers J. Analysis of the mental health parity provision of S. 1028. Price Waterhouse, Washington, DC 1996
   Google Scholar
• Sing M. The costs and effects of parity for mental health and substance abuse insurance benefits. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC 1998
   Google Scholar
• Watson Wyatt Worldwide. The costs of uniform plan provisions for medical and mental health services: an analysis of S. 298. The ‘Equitable Health Care for Severe Mental Illness Act’. Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Bethesda, MD 1996
   Google Scholar
• Bachman R E. An actuarial analysis of the Domenici-Wellstone Amendment to S. 1028. ‘Health Insurance Reform Act’ to provide parity for mental health benefits under group and individual insurance plans. Coopers & Lybrand, Atlanta, GA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Oss M, Jardine E L, Pesare M J. Open Minds yearbook of managed behavioral health and employee assistance program market share in the U.S., 2002–2003. Open Minds, Gettysburg, PA 2003
   Google Scholar
• Miller R H, Luft H S. HMO Plan performance update: an analysis of the literature, 1997–2001. Health Aff 2002; 21: 63–86, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Estimating the costs of parity for mental health: methods and evidence. Results from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Workshop, Washington, DC May, 2001
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Congressional Budget Office. Cost estimate: S543 Mental Health Equitable Treatment Act of 2001. CBO, Washington, DC 2001
   Google Scholar
• Barry C L, Frank R G, McGuire T G. The costs of mental health parity: still an impediment?. Health Aff 2006; 25: 623–34, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman H H, Frank R G, Burnam M A, et al. Evaluating the impact of parity mental health and substance abuse (mh/sa) benefits in the Federal Employees Health Benefit (FEHB) Program. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1378–86, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenman J. Testimony on behalf of ERISA Industry Committee before Subcommittee on Employer–Employer Relations of Committee on Education and the Workforce. March, 132002, U.S. House of Representatives
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann C. Four more states see value of parity laws. Psychiatr News 2001; 36(16)8, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Pollock P. Issues, values, and critical moments: did “Magic” Johnson transform public opinion on AIDS?. Am J Polit Sci 1994; 38: 426–46, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSween J L. the role of group interest, identity, and stigma in determining mental health policy preferences. J Health Polit Policy Law 2002; 27: 773–800, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAMI—New York State. Timothy's Law projects. 2004, http://www.naminys.org/tim_pro.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hanson K W. Pubic opinion and the mental health parity debate: lessons from the survey literature. Psychiatr Serv 1998; 49: 1059–66, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy K, Barry C L. Parity in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: an overview. Center for Mental Health Services, R W Manderscheid, M J Henderson. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD 2004, Mental health, United States, 2002 [DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 3938)]. http://www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/media/KEN/pdf/SMA01-3938/MHUS02_Chapter_14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbach M, Lake T, Young C, et al. Effects of the Vermont Mental Health and Substance Abuse Parity Law. Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD 2003, [DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 03-3822]
   Google Scholar
• Ma C A, McGuire T G. Costs and incentives in a behavioral health care carve out. Health Aff 1998; 17: 53–69, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman W J, McCulloch J, Sturm R. Costs and use of mental health services before and after managed care. Health Aff 1998; 17: 40–52, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar