Calibration of the comet assay for the measurement of DNA damage in mammalian cells

References

• Ames B. Dietary carcinogens and anticarcinogens. Oxygen radicals and degenerative diseases. Science 1983; 221: 1256–1264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannelli L, Saieva C, Masala G, Testa G, Salvini S, Pitozzi V, Riboli E, Dolara P, Palli D. Nutritional and lifestyle determinants of DNA oxidative damage: A study in a Mediterranean population. Carcinogenesis 2002; 23: 1483–1489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller P, Loft S, Alfthan G, Freese R, Oxidative DNA. Damage in circulating mononuclear blood cells after ingestion of blackcurrant juice or anthocyanin-rich drink. Mutat Res 2004; 551: 119–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESCODD. Comparative analysis of baseline 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in mammalian cell DNA, by different methods in different laboratories: An approach to consensus. Carcinogenesis 2002; 23: 2129–2133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESCODD. Measurement of DNA oxidation in human cells by chromatographic and enzymic methods. Free Radic Biol Med 2003; 34: 1089–1099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandona P, Thusu K, Cook S, Snyder B, Makowski J, Armstrong D, Nicotera T. Oxidative damage to DNA in diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1996; 347: 444–445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins AR, Raslova K, Somorovska M, Petrovska H, Ondrusova A, Vohnout B, Fabry R, Dusinska M. DNA damage in diabetes: Correlation with a clinical marker. Free Radic Biol Med 1998; 25: 373–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Scheider EL. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1988; 175: 184–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins AR, Duthie SJ, Dobson VL. Direct enzymic detection of endogenous oxidative base damage in human lymphocyte DNA. Carcinogenesis 1993; 14: 1733–1735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflaum M, Will O, Epe B. Determination of steady-state levels of oxidative DNA base modifications in mammalian cells by means of repair endonucleases. Carcinogenesis 1997; 18: 2225–2231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig A, Dally H, Schlepegrell R. Sensitive analysis of oxidative DNA damage in mammalian cells: Use of the bacterial Fpg protein in combination with alkaline unwinding. Toxicol Lett 1996; 88: 85–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahnstrom G, Erixon K. Measurement of strand breaks by alkaline denaturation and hydroxyapatite chromatography. DNA repair-a laboratory manual of research procedures, EC Friedberg, PC Hanawalt. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY and Basel 1981; 403–418
   Google Scholar
• Collins AR, Dusinska M, Gedik CM, Stetina R. Oxidative damage to DNA: Do we have a reliable biomarker?. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104(suppl. 3)465–469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller P, Friis G, Christensen PH, Risom L, Plesner G, Kjaersgaard J, Vinzents P, Loft S, Jensen A, Tved M. Intra-laboratory comet assay sample scoring exercise for determination of formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase sites in human mononuclear blood cell DNA. Free Radic Res 2004; 38: 1207–1214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA Technical Report Series TRS-398. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: A code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water Wien 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths HR, Moller L, Bartosz G, Bast A, Bertoni-Freddari C, Collins A, Cooke M, Coolen S, Haenen G, Hoberg AM, Loft S, Lunec J, Olinski R, Parry J, Pompella A, Poulsen H, Verhagen H, Astley SB. Biomarkers. Mol Aspects Med 2002; 23: 101–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MA. The variation in biological effectiveness of X-rays and gamma rays with energy. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2004; 112: 471–481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedik CM, Collins AR, ESCODD. Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: Results of an interlaboratory validation study. FASEB J 2005; 19: 82–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar