Reactive oxygen species: the root cause of nanoparticle-induced toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster

References

• Love SA, Maurer-Jones MA, Thompson JW, et al. Assessing nanoparticle toxicity. Annu Rev Anal Chem. 2012;5:181–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajewicz A, Rasulev B, Dinadayalane TC, et al. Advancing risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: application of computational approaches. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:1663–1693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll A, Pillukat MH, Hahn D, et al. Current in vitro methods in nanoparticle risk assessment: limitations and challenges. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;72:370–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barik BK, Mishra M. Nanoparticles as a potential teratogen: a lesson learnt from fruit fly. Nanotoxicology. 2019;13:258–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton SE, Ropp PA, Pohlhaus PD, et al. The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:11613–11618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdal Dayem A, Hossain MK, Lee SB, et al. The role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the biological activities of metallic nanoparticles. IJMS. 2017;18:120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colon J, Hsieh N, Ferguson A, et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles protect gastrointestinal epithelium from radiation-induced damage by reduction of reactive oxygen species and upregulation of superoxide dismutase 2. Nanomedicine. 2010;6:698–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey UB, Nichols CD. Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63:411–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaitre B, Miguel-Aliaga I. The digestive tract of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Genet. 2013;47:377–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuraishi T, Binggeli O, Opota O, et al. Genetic evidence for a protective role of the peritrophic matrix against intestinal bacterial infection in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:15966–15971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchon N, Osman D, David FP, et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of adult midgut compartmentalization in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1725–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apidianakis Y, Rahme LG. Drosophila melanogaster as a model for human intestinal infection and pathology. Dis Model Mech. 2011;4:21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahamed M, Posgai R, Gorey TJ, et al. Silver nanoparticles induced heat shock protein 70, oxidative stress and apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;242:263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhaylov VI, Kryuchkova AV, Sitnikov PA, et al. Magnetite hydrosols with positive and negative surface charge of nanoparticles: stability and effect on the lifespan of Drosophila melanogaster. Langmuir. 2020;36:4405–4415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappus SA, Mishra M. A Drosophila model to decipher the toxicity of nanoparticles taken through oral routes. In: Saquib Q, Faisal M, Al-Khedhairy A, editors. Cellular and molecular toxicology of nanoparticles. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2018. p. 311–322.
   Google Scholar
• Alaraby M, Annangi B, Marcos R, et al. Drosophila melanogaster as a suitable in vivo model to determine potential side effects of nanomaterials: a review. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2016;19:65–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey A, Chandra S, Chauhan LKS, et al. Cellular internalization and stress response of ingested amorphous silica nanoparticles in the midgut of Drosophila melanogaster. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830:2256–2266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodmer R, Venkatesh TV. Heart development in Drosophila and vertebrates: conservation of molecular mechanisms. Dev Genet. 1998;22:181–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aderem A, Underhill DM. Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:593–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Márkus R, Laurinyecz B, Kurucz É, et al. Sessile hemocytes as a hematopoietic compartment in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:4805–4809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozatier M, Vincent A. Drosophila: a model for studying genetic and molecular aspects of haematopoiesis and associated leukaemias. Dis Model Mech. 2011;4:439–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann JA, Kafatos FC, Janeway CA, et al. Phylogenetic perspectives in innate immunity. Science. 1999;284:1313–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000;287:2185–2195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar A, Irwin M, Singh A, et al. Alzheimer’s disease: the silver tsunami of the 21(st) century. Neural Regen Res. 2016;11:693–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wawersik S, Maas RL. Vertebrate eye development as modeled in Drosophila. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:917–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekhoff‐Falk G. Hearing in Drosophila: development of Johnston’s organ and emerging parallels to vertebrate ear development. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of. Anatomists. 2005;232:550–558.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Senthilan PR, Effertz T, et al. Using Drosophila for studying fundamental processes in hearing. Integr Comp Biol. 2009;49:674–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee AR, Lee SJ, Lee M, et al. Editor’s highlight: a genome-wide screening of target genes against silver nanoparticles in fission yeast. Toxicol Sci. 2018;161:171–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He W, Zhou YT, Wamer WG, et al. Mechanisms of the pH dependent generation of hydroxyl radicals and oxygen induced by Ag nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2012;33:7547–7555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Qin T, Ingle T, et al. Differential genotoxicity mechanisms of silver nanoparticles and silver ions. Arch Toxicol. 2017;91:509–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Vinson D, Abt D, et al. Differential toxicity of carbon nanomaterials in Drosophila: larval dietary uptake is benign, but adult exposure causes locomotor impairment and mortality. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:6357–6363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Andrade LR, Brito AS, de Souza Melero AMG, et al. Absence of mutagenic and recombinagenic activity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in the Drosophila wing-spot test and Allium cepa test. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014;99:92–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Alvarez S, Herrera A, Rinaldi C, et al. Tissue-specific direct microtransfer of nanomaterials into Drosophila embryos as a versatile in vivo test bed for nanomaterial toxicity assessment. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:2031–2041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strawn ET, Cohen CA, Rzigalinski BA. Cerium oxide nanoparticles increase lifespan and protect against free radical‐mediated toxicity. FASEB J. 2006;20:A1356–A1356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson C, Hussain SM, Schrand AM, et al. Unique cellular interaction of silver nanoparticles: size-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:13608–13619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Qu F, Xu H, et al. Role of reactive oxygen species in the antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles on Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biometals. 2012;25:45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Y, Gong X, Duan Y, et al. Hepatocyte apoptosis and its molecular mechanisms in mice caused by titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater. 2010;183:874–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panacek A, Prucek R, Safarova D, et al. Acute and chronic toxicity effects of silver nanoparticles (NPs) on Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:4974–4979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir E, Vales G, Kaya B, et al. Genotoxic analysis of silver nanoparticles in Drosophila. Nanotoxicology. 2011;5:417–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi S, Arya A, Tyagi PK, et al. Development of Drosophila melanogaster for assessing metal nanoparticles interaction. Int. J. Basic Appl. Biol. 2016;3:132–135.
   Google Scholar
• Perez RG, Hastings TG. Could a loss of alpha-synuclein function put dopaminergic neurons at risk? J Neurochem. 2004;89:1318–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj A, Shah P, Agrawal N. Dose-dependent effect of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) on fertility and survival of Drosophila: an in-vivo study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong N, Ramamoorthy M, Lyon D, et al. Mechanism of silver nanoparticles action on insect pigmentation reveals intervention of copper homeostasis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benetti F, Bregoli L, Olivato I, et al. Effects of metal(loid)-based nanomaterials on essential element homeostasis: the central role of nanometallomics for nanotoxicology. Metallomics. 2014;6:729–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian H, Eom HJ, Moon S, et al. Development of biomarker for detecting silver nanoparticles exposure using a GAL4 enhancer trap screening in Drosophila. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013;36:548–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosi NL, Mirkin CA. Nanostructures in biodiagnostics. Chem Rev. 2005;105:1547–1562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompa PP, Vecchio G, Galeone A, et al. In vivo toxicity assessment of gold nanoparticles in Drosophila melanogaster. Nano Res. 2011;4:405–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio G, Galeone A, Brunetti V, et al. Mutagenic effects of gold nanoparticles induce aberrant phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Nanomedicine. 2012;8:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadrup N, Sharma AK, Poulsen M, et al. Toxicological risk assessment of elemental gold following oral exposure to sheets and nanoparticles – a review. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;72:216–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Tan KL, Agosto MA, et al. The retromer complex is required for rhodopsin recycling and its loss leads to photoreceptor degeneration. PLoS Biol. 2014;12:e1001847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand AS, Gahlot U, Prasad DN, et al. Aluminum oxide nanoparticles mediated toxicity, loss of appendages in progeny of Drosophila melanogaster on chronic exposure. Nanotoxicology. 2019;13:977–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang N, Yan Y, Xu Y, et al. Alumina nanoparticles alter rhythmic activities of local interneurons in the antennal lobe of Drosophila. Nanotoxicology. 2013;7:212–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona ER, Inostroza-Blancheteau C, Rubio L, et al. Genotoxic and oxidative stress potential of nanosized and bulk zinc oxide particles in Drosophila melanogaster. Toxicol Ind Health. 2016;32:1987–2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaraby M, Romero S, Hernández A, et al. Toxic and genotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles in Drosophila. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2019;60:277–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Geller B, Moniz K, et al. Monitoring the developmental impact of copper and silver nanoparticle exposure in Drosophila and their microbiomes. Sci Total Environ. 2014;487:822–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir A, Westerhoff P, Fabricius L, et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:2242–2250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philbrook NA, Walker VK, Afrooz AN, et al. Investigating the effects of functionalized carbon nanotubes on reproduction and development in Drosophila melanogaster and CD-1 mice. Reprod Toxicol. 2011;32:442–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanović B, Cvetković VJ, Mitrović TL. Effects of human food grade titanium dioxide nanoparticle dietary exposure on Drosophila melanogaster survival, fecundity, pupation and expression of antioxidant genes. Chemosphere. 2016;144:43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel J, Champavat V. Toxicity of nanomaterials on the gastrointestinal tract. In: Sutariya VB, Pathak Y, editors. Biointeractions of nanomaterials. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2014. p. 259.
   Google Scholar
• Sabat D, Patnaik A, Ekka B, et al. Investigation of titania nanoparticles on behaviour and mechanosensory organ of Drosophila melanogaster. Physiol Behav. 2016;167:76–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vales G, Demir E, Kaya B, et al. Genotoxicity of cobalt nanoparticles and ions in Drosophila. Nanotoxicology. 2013;7:462–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeone A, Vecchio G, Malvindi M, et al. In vivo assessment of CdSe-ZnS quantum dots: coating dependent bioaccumulation and genotoxicity. Nanoscale. 2012;4:6401–6407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Wang B, Feng W, et al. Oral magnetite nanoparticles disturb the development of Drosophila melanogaster from oogenesis to adult emergence. Nanotoxicology. 2015;9:302–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona ER, García-Rodríguez A, Marcos R. Genotoxicity of copper and nickel nanoparticles in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. J Toxicol. 2018;2018:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra M, Sabat D, Ekka B, et al. Oral intake of zirconia nanoparticle alters neuronal development and behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. J Nanoparticle Res. 2017;19:282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappus SA, Ekka B, Sahu S, et al. A toxicity assessment of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on development and behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. J Nanoparticle Res. 2017;19:136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu S, Mishra M. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticle causes sensory organ defects by targeting the retromer complex in Drosophila melanogaster. NanoImpact. 2020;19:100237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir E, Kocaoğlu S, Kaya B. Antigenotoxic properties of chlorophyllin and chlorophylls in the Drosophila wing spot test. Fresen Environ Bull. 2010;19:3131–3138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick T, Karmakar A, Bag J, et al. Carbazole analog anchored fluorescent silica nanoparticle showing enhanced biocompatibility and selective sensing ability towards biomacromolecule. Dyes Pigm. 2020;173:107994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danhier F, Ansorena E, Silva JM, et al. PLGA-based nanoparticles: an overview of biomedical applications. J Control Release. 2012;161:505–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavot V, Berthet M, Rességuier J, et al. Poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) particles as versatile carrier platforms for vaccine delivery. Nanomedicine. 2014;9:2703–2718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legaz S, Exposito JY, Lethias C, et al. Evaluation of polylactic acid nanoparticles safety using Drosophila model. Nanotoxicology. 2016;10:1136–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang S, Teng CP, Puah WC, et al. Oral administration and selective uptake of polymeric nanoparticles in Drosophila larvae as an in vivo model. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2015;1:1077–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semete B, Booysen L, Kalombo L, et al. In vivo uptake and acute immune response to orally administered chitosan and PEG coated PLGA nanoparticles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;249:158–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra PK, Ekielski A, Mukherjee S, et al. Wood-based cellulose nanofibrils: haemocompatibility and impact on the development and behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. Biomolecules. 2019;9:363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui L, Bag J, Mittal D, et al. Assessing the potential of lignin nanoparticles as drug carrier: synthesis, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity studies. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;152:786–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykkesfeldt J. Malondialdehyde as biomarker of oxidative damage to lipids caused by smoking. Clin Chim Acta. 2007;380:50–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magwere T, West M, Riyahi K, et al. The effects of exogenous antioxidants on lifespan and oxidative stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Mech Ageing Dev. 2006;127:356–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow G, Tanguay RM. Heat shock proteins and aging in Drosophila melanogaster. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2003;14:291–299. Elsevier. p
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedlicka P, Mortin MA, Wu C. Multiple functions of Drosophila heat shock transcription factor in vivo. Embo J. 1997;16:2452–2462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese V, Scapagnini G, Ravagna A, et al. Regional distribution of heme oxygenase, HSP70, and glutathione in brain: relevance for endogenous oxidant/antioxidant balance and stress tolerance. J Neurosci Res. 2002;68:65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash TP, Pan Y, Simon MC. Reactive oxygen species and cellular oxygen sensing. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;43:1219–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowaltowski AJ, de Souza-Pinto NC, Castilho RF, et al. Mitochondria and reactive oxygen species. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;47:333–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posgai R, Cipolla-McCulloch CB, Murphy KR, et al. Differential toxicity of silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on Drosophila melanogaster development, reproductive effort, and viability: size, coatings and antioxidants matter. Chemosphere. 2011;85:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay I, Nazir A, Saxena D, et al. Heat shock response: hsp70 in environmental monitoring. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2003;17:249–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddique HR, Gupta SC, Mitra K, et al. Adverse effect of tannery waste leachates in transgenic Drosophila melanogaster: role of ROS in modulation of Hsp70, oxidative stress and apoptosis. J Appl Toxicol. 2008;28:734–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddique YH, Fatima A, Jyoti S, et al. Evaluation of the toxic potential of graphene copper nanocomposite (GCNC) in the third instar larvae of transgenic Drosophila melanogaster (hsp70-lacZ) Bg 9. PloS One. 2013;8:e80944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow G, Samson M, Michaud S, et al. Overexpression of the small mitochondrial Hsp22 extends Drosophila life span and increases resistance to oxidative stress. FASEB J. 2004;18:598–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemetov AA, Seit ‐Nebi AS, Gusev NB. Structure, properties, and functions of the human small heat-shock protein HSP22 (HspB8, H11, E2IG1): a critical review . J Neurosci Res. 2008;86:264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona ER, Inostroza-Blancheteau C, Obando V, et al. Genotoxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2015;791:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang Z, Li X, et al. Dietary iron oxide nanoparticles delay aging and ameliorate neurodegeneration in drosophila. Adv Mater. 2016;28:1387–1393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adolfsson K, Schneider M, Hammarin G, et al. Ingestion of gallium phosphide nanowires has no adverse effect on Drosophila tissue function. Nanotechnology. 2013;24:285101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaraby M, Annangi B, Hernández A, et al. A comprehensive study of the harmful effects of ZnO nanoparticles using Drosophila melanogaster as an in vivo model. J Hazard Mater. 2015;296:166–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng CT, Yong LQ, Hande MP, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles exhibit cytotoxicity and genotoxicity through oxidative stress responses in human lung fibroblasts and Drosophila melanogaster. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:1621–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Melo Reis É, de Rezende AAA, Santos DV, et al. Assessment of the genotoxic potential of two zinc oxide sources (amorphous and nanoparticles) using the in vitro micronucleus test and the in vivo wing somatic mutation and recombination test. Food Chem Toxicol. 2015;84:55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carli RF, Chaves DS, Cardozo TR, et al. Evaluation of the genotoxic properties of nickel oxide nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo. Mutat Res. 2018;836:47–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Du Y, Xue H, et al. Aluminum induces neurodegeneration and its toxicity arises from increased iron accumulation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:199.e1–e1-199. e12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra M, Sabat D, Ekka B, et al. Oral intake of zirconia nanoparticle alters neuronal development and behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. J Nanopart Res. 2017;19:282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappus SA, Ekka B, Sahu S, et al. A toxicity assessment of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on development and behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. J Nanopart Res. 2017;19:136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dan P, Sundararajan V, Ganeshkumar H, et al. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles-induced in vivo toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;484:568–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundararajan V, Dan P, Kumar A, et al. Drosophila melanogaster as an in vivo model to study the potential toxicity of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci . 2019;490:70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir E, Aksakal S, Turna F, et al. In vivo genotoxic effects of four different nano-sizes forms of silica nanoparticles in Drosophila melanogaster. J Hazard Mater. 2015;283:260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunetti V, Chibli H, Fiammengo R, et al. InP/ZnS as a safer alternative to CdSe/ZnS core/shell quantum dots: in vitro and in vivo toxicity assessment. Nanoscale. 2013;5:307–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priyadarsini S, Sahoo SK, Sahu S, et al. Oral administration of graphene oxide nano-sheets induces oxidative stress, genotoxicity, and behavioral teratogenicity in Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019;26:19560–19574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudo M, Unnithan GC, Le Goff G, et al. Regulation of cytochrome P450 expression in Drosophila: genomic insights. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2010;97:115–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung H, Sztal T, Pasricha S, et al. Characterization of Drosophila melanogaster cytochrome P450 genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:5731–5736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey H, Saini S, Singh SP, et al. Candle soot derived carbon nanoparticles: an assessment of cellular and progressive toxicity using Drosophila melanogaster model. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020;228:108646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddique YH, Khan W, Khanam S, et al. Toxic potential of synthesized graphene zinc oxide nanocomposite in the third instar larvae of transgenic Drosophila melanogaster (hsp70-lacZ) Bg9. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:382124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medema RH, Kops GJ, Bos JL, et al. AFX-like Forkhead transcription factors mediate cell-cycle regulation by Ras and PKB through p27kip1. Nature. 2000;404:782–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essers J, van Cappellen WA, Theil AF, et al. Dynamics of relative chromosome position during the cell cycle. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:769–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer EL, Brunet A. FOXO transcription factors at the interface between longevity and tumor suppression. Oncogene. 2005;24:7410–7425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen CJ, Loeschcke V. Longevity and the stress response in Drosophila. Exp Gerontol. 2007;42:153–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha EM, Oh CT, Ryu JH, et al. An antioxidant system required for host protection against gut infection in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2005;8:125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doganlar O, Doganlar BZ. Responses of antioxidant enzymes and heat shock proteins in Drosophila to treatment with a pesticide mixture. Arch Biol Sci. 2015;67:869–876.
   Google Scholar
• Cross CE, Valacchi G, Schock B, et al. Environmental oxidant pollutant effects on biologic systems: a focus on micronutrient antioxidant-oxidant interactions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:S44–S50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson M. Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism for understanding the interrelationship of micronutrient antioxidants and atmospheric oxidative stress. University of California, Davis; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna P, Ong C, Bay BH, et al. Nanotoxicity: an interplay of oxidative stress, inflammation and cell death. Nanomaterials. 2015;5:1163–1180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anandan R, Ganesan B, Obulesu T, et al. Antiaging effect of dietary chitosan supplementation on glutathione-dependent antioxidant system in young and aged rats. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2013;18:121–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho Y, Shi R, Borgens RB. Chitosan nanoparticle-based neuronal membrane sealing and neuroprotection following acrolein-induced cell injury. J Biol Eng. 2010;4:2–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fang IM, Yang CH, Yang CM, et al. Chitosan oligosaccharides attenuates oxidative-stress related retinal degeneration in rats. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar PP, K V HP. Low Molecular Weight Chitosan (∼20 kDa) protects acrylamide induced oxidative stress in D. melanogaster by restoring dopamine and KIF5B levels. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;222:115005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu B, Lv X, Le Y. Chitosan-modified PLGA nanoparticles for control-released drug delivery. Polymers. 2019;11:304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Li J, Borgens RB. Neuroprotection by chitosan nanoparticles in oxidative stress-mediated injury. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Itoh K, Chiba T, Takahashi S, et al. An Nrf2/small Maf heterodimer mediates the induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;236:313–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itoh K, Tong KI, Yamamoto M. Molecular mechanism activating Nrf2-Keap1 pathway in regulation of adaptive response to electrophiles. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;36:1208–1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang R, Ghaffari S. Stem cells, redox signaling, and stem cell aging. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;20:1902–1916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeg E, Sooklert K, Sereemaspun A. Copper oxide nanoparticles cause a dose-dependent toxicity via inducing reactive oxygen species in drosophila. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Kern JT, Walker JR, et al. A genomic screen for activators of the antioxidant response element. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:5205–5210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charroux B, Royet J. Drosophila immune response: from systemic antimicrobial peptide production in fat body cells to local defense in the intestinal tract. Fly. 2010;4:40–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel T, Reichhart JM, Hoffmann JA, et al. Drosophila Toll is activated by Gram-positive bacteria through a circulating peptidoglycan recognition protein. Nature. 2001;414:756–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchon N, Silverman N, Cherry S. Immunity in Drosophila melanogaster-from microbial recognition to whole-organism physiology. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:796–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng CT, Yu LE, Ong CN, et al. The use of Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism to study immune-nanotoxicity. Nanotoxicology. 2019;13:429–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiroyasu A, DeWitt DC, Goodman AG. Extraction of hemocytes from Drosophila melanogaster larvae for microbial infection and analysis. JoVE. 2018;(135):e57077.
   Google Scholar
• Zettervall CJ, Anderl I, Williams MJ, et al. A directed screen for genes involved in Drosophila blood cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14192–14197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang H. Regulation and function of the melanization reaction in Drosophila. Fly. 2009;3:105–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canesi L, Procházková P. The invertebrate immune system as a model for investigating the environmental impact of nanoparticles. In: Boraschi D, Duschl A, editors. Nanoparticles and the immune system. Oxford (UK): Academic Press; 2014. p. 91–112.
   Google Scholar
• Leulier F, Rodriguez A, Khush RS, et al. The Drosophila caspase Dredd is required to resist gram-negative bacterial infection . EMBO Rep. 2000;1:353–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao BH, Chen ZY, Wang YJ, et al. Silver nanoparticles have lethal and sublethal adverse effects on development and longevity by inducing ROS-mediated stress responses. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaraby M, Hernández A, Marcos R. New insights in the acute toxic/genotoxic effects of CuO nanoparticles in the in vivo Drosophila model. Nanotoxicology. 2016;10:749–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arms L, Smith DW, Flynn J, et al. Advantages and limitations of current techniques for analyzing the biodistribution of nanoparticles. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishwakarma V, Samal SS, Manoharan N. Safety and risk associated with nanoparticles-a review. JMMCE. 2010;09:455–459.
   Google Scholar
• Hagens WI, Oomen AG, de Jong WH, et al. What do we (need to) know about the kinetic properties of nanoparticles in the body? Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007;49:217–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite-Silva VR, Liu DC, Sanchez WY, et al. Effect of flexing and massage on in vivo human skin penetration and toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2016;11:1193–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadrieh N, Wokovich AM, Gopee NV, et al. Lack of significant dermal penetration of titanium dioxide from sunscreen formulations containing nano- and submicron-size TiO2 particles. Toxicol Sci. 2010;115:156–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar