Biocompatibility assessment of bovine serum albumin conjugated manganese dioxide nanoparticle and their therapeutic role against microwave radiation induced haematological toxicity in male Wistar rats

References

• Singh R, Nath R, Mathur AK, et al. Effect of radiofrequency radiation on reproductive health. Indian J Med Res. 2018;148(Suppl):s92–S99. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1056_18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhi WJ, Wang LF, Hu XJ. Recent advances in the effects of microwave radiation on brains. Mil Med Res. 2017;4(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40779-017-0139-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Statista. Number of mobile (cellular) subscriptions worldwide from 1993 to 2022. 2022; [cited 2023 Jun 05]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/262950/global-mobile-subscriptions-since-1993/.
   Google Scholar
• Miller AB, Sears ME, Morgan LL, et al. Risks to health and well-being from radio-frequency radiation emitted by cell phones and other wireless devices. Front Public Health. 2019;7:223. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh KV, Gautam R, Meena R, et al. Effect of mobile phone radiation on oxidative stress, inflammatory response, and contextual fear memory in Wistar rat. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020;27(16):19340–19351. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07916-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam R, Priyadarshini E, Nirala JP, et al. Modulatory effects of punica granatum L juice against 2115 MHz (3G) radiation-induced reproductive toxicity in male Wistar rat. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28(39):54756–54765. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14378-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sani A, Labaran MM, Dayyabu B. Effects of electromagnetic radiation of mobile phones on hematological and biochemical parameters in male albino rats. Eur J Exp Bio. 2018;08(02):11. doi: 10.21767/2248-9215.100052.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher B, Sheena Mary Y, Khandaker MU, et al. Effects of mobile phone radiation on certain hematological parameters. Radiat Phys Chem. 2020;166:108443. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizan A, Samsudin AA, Shamshul Baharin MB, et al. Cellulosic fiber nanocomposite application review with zinc oxide antimicrobial agent nanoparticle: an opt for COVID-19 purpose. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022;30(7):16779–16796. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18515-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardhiya S, Rajamani P. Role of nanoparticles in targeted drug delivery system. Nanotech Drug Del. 2014;2:21–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ajith MP, Aswathi M, Priyadarshini E, et al. Recent innovations of nanotechnology in water treatment: a comprehensive review. Bioresour Technol. 2021;342:126000. doi: 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2021.126000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajith MP, Pardhiya S, Rajamani P. Carbon dots: an excellent fluorescent probe for contaminant sensing and remediation. Small. 2022b;18(15):e2105579. doi: 10.1002/smll.202105579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajith MP, Pardhiya S, Prabhakar AK, et al. Ag@CDs nanohybrid: fabrication, design of a multi-mode chemosensory probe for selective Fe3+ detection and logic gate operation. Chemosphere. 2022a;303(Pt 3):135090. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135090.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valgimigli L, Baschieri A, Amorati R. Antioxidant activity of nanomaterials. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(14):2036–2051. doi: 10.1039/C8TB00107C.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash KM, Ahmed S. Nanomedicine in the ROS-mediated pathophysiology: applications and clinical advances. Nanomedicine. 2015;11(8):2033–2040. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariam J, Sivakami S, Dongre PM. Albumin corona on nanoparticles–A strategic approach in drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2016;23(8):2668–2676. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2015.1048488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khullar P, Singh V, Mahal A, et al. Bovine serum albumin bioconjugated gold nanoparticles: synthesis, hemolysis, and cytotoxicity toward cancer cell lines. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116(15):8834–8843. doi: 10.1021/jp300585d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardhiya S, Gautam R, Nirala JP, et al. Modulatory role of bovine serum albumin conjugated manganese dioxide nanoparticle on microwave radiation induced alterations in reproductive parameters of rat. Reprod Toxicol. 2022;113:136–149. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2022.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardhiya S, Priyadarshini E, Rajamani P. In vitro antioxidant activity of synthesized BSA conjugated manganese dioxide nanoparticles. SN Appl Sci. 2020b;2(9):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-03407-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okechukwu CE. Does the use of mobile phone affect male fertility? A mini-review. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020;13(3):174–183. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_126_19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imai N, Kawabe M, Hikage T, et al. Effects on rat testis of 1.95-GHz W-CDMA for IMT-2000 cellular phones. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2011;57(4):204–209. doi: 10.3109/19396368.2010.544839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porwal M, Khan NA, Maheshwari KK. Evaluation of acute and subacute oral toxicity induced by ethanolic extract of marsdenia tenacissima leaves in experimental rats. Sci Pharm. 2017;85(3):29. doi: 10.3390/scipharm85030029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaharwar US, Meena R, Rajamani P. Biodistribution, clearance and morphological alterations of intravenously administered iron oxide nanoparticles in male Wistar rats. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:9677–9692. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S223142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1–2):248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer WF, Fridovich I. Assaying for superoxide dismutase activity: some large consequences of minor changes in conditions. Anal Biochem. 1987;161(2):559–566. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90489-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha AK. Colorimetric assay of catalase. Anal Biochem. 1972;47(2):389–394. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90132-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadwan MH. New method for assessment of serum catalase activity. Indian J Sci Technol. 2016;9(4):1–5. doi: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i4/80499.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghnia HR, Shaterzadeh H, Forouzanfar F, et al. Neuroprotective effect of safranal, an active ingredient of crocus sativus, in a rat model of transient cerebral ischemia. Folia Neuropathol. 2017;55(3):206–213. doi: 10.5114/fn.2017.70485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzie IFF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996;239(1):70–76. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979;95(2):351–358. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durney CH, Iskander MF, Massoudi H, et al. An empirical formula for broad-band SAR calculations of prolate spheroidal models of humans and animals. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech. 1979;27(8):758–763. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.1979.1129720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge JT, Mitchell C, Hanahan DJ. The preparation and chemical characteristics of hemoglobin-free ghosts of human erythrocytes. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1963;100(1):119–130. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(63)90042-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulraj R, Behari J. Single strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells exposed to microwave radiation. Mutat Res. 2006;596(1–2):76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Doaiss AA, Ali D, Ali BA, et al. Renal histological alterations induced by acute exposure of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Int J Morphol. 2019;37(3).1049–1057. doi: 10.4067/S0717-9502201900030:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim KE, Al-Mutary MG, Bakhiet AO, et al. Histopathology of the liver, kidney, and spleen of mice exposed to gold nanoparticles. Molecules. 2018;23(8):1848. doi: 10.3390/molecules23081848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Zhao L, Luo J, et al. The toxic effects and mechanisms of nano-Cu on the spleen of rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1469. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Li Y, Wang W, et al. Acute toxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles in intravenously exposed ICR mice. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan R, Mo Y, Zhang Z, et al. Cobalt nanoparticles induce lung injury, DNA damage and mutations in mice. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2017;14(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12989-017-0219-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexis F, Pridgen E, Molnar LK, et al. Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Mol Pharm. 2008;5(4):505–515. doi: 10.1021/mp800051m.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin F, Shen T, Li J, et al. SF-1 mediates reproductive toxicity induced by cerium oxide nanoparticles in male mice. J Nanobiotech. 2019;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12951-019-0474-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thakur M, Gupta H, Singh D, et al. Histopathological and ultra structural effects of nanoparticles on rat testis following 90 days (chronic study) of repeated oral administration. J Nanobiotech. 2014;12(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12951-014-0042-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenita J, Wilson B, Chocalingam V. Albumin nanoparticles coated with polysorbate 80 as a novel drug carrier for the delivery of antiretroviral drug-Efavirenz. Int J Pharm Investig. 2014;4(3):142–148. doi: 10.4103/2230-973x.138348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garza-Ocañas L, Ferrer DA, Burt J, et al. Biodistribution and long-term fate of silver nanoparticles functionalized with bovine serum albumin in rats. Metallomics. 2010;2(3):204–210. doi: 10.1039/b916107d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich K, Jakob U. The role of thiols in antioxidant systems. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;140:14–27. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.05.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorrami MB, Sadeghnia HR, Pasdar A, et al. Antioxidant and toxicity studies of biosynthesized cerium oxide nanoparticles in rats. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:2915–2926. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S194192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, et al. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science. 2006;311(5761):622–627. doi: 10.1126/science.111439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SP, Kumari M, Kumari SI, et al. Toxicity assessment of manganese oxide micro and nanoparticles in Wistar rats after 28 days of repeated oral exposure. J Appl Toxicol. 2013;33(10):1165–1179. doi: 10.1002/jat.2887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefalizadegan N, Mousavi Z, Rastegar T, et al. Reproductive toxicity of manganese dioxide in forms of micro- and nanoparticles in male rats. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019;17(5):361–370.). doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i5.4603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardhiya S, Gaharwar US, Gautam R, et al. Cumulative effects of manganese nanoparticle and radiofrequency radiation in male Wistar rats. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2020a;45(3):1395–1407. doi: 10.1080/01480545.2020.1833905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajamani P, Ajith MP, Gautam R. Impact of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles on male reproductive system: a comprehensive review. IJBB. 2022;59(11):1048–1055. doi: 10.56042/ijbb.v59i11.67292.
   Google Scholar
• Pitchai K, Chen J, Birla S, et al. Modeling microwave heating of frozen mashed potato in a domestic oven incorporating electromagnetic frequency spectrum. J Food Eng. 2016;173:124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özsobacı NP, Ergün DD, Tunçdemir M, et al. Protective effects of zinc on 2.45 ghz electromagnetic radiation-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in HEK293 cells. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2020;194(2):368–378. doi: 10.1007/s12011-019-01811-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Srivastava R. 2.45 GHz microwave radiation induced oxidative stress: role of inflammatory cytokines in regulating male fertility through estrogen receptor alpha in Gallus gallus domesticus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;629:61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.09.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahin S, Mishra V, Singh SP, et al. 2.45-GHz microwave irradiation adversely affects reproductive function in male mouse, Mus musculus by inducing oxidative and nitrosative stress. Free Radic Res. 2014;48(5):511–525. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2014.888717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Radiation: Microwave ovens. 2005; Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/radiation-microwave-ovens.
   Google Scholar
• Kumari P, Manjula SD, Gautham K. In vitro study of effect of radiation emitted by mobile phone on osmotic fragility and other blood parameters. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2016;7(4):1283–1292.
   Google Scholar
• Sedehi Esfahani M, Radmehr B, Kohbodi A. Detection of probable effects of microwave exposure of blood parameters of RBC, PCV and Hb in rat. Pak J Biol Sci. 2007;10(24):4567–4569. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.4567.4569.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hashim SW, Al-Uboody H. Effect of mobile phone electromagnetic waves on the hematological and biochemical parameters in laboratory mice (Mus musculus). Basrah J Veterinary Res. 2015;14(2):250–264.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavy SJ, Riazi GH, Kamarei M, et al. Effects of mobile phone radiofrequency on the structure and function of the normal human hemoglobin. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;44(3):278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Muehsam D, Lalezari P, Lekhraj R, et al. Non-thermal radio frequency and static magnetic fields increase rate of hemoglobin deoxygenation in a cell-free preparation. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yinhui P, Hui G, Lin L, et al. Effect of cell phone radiation on neutrophil of mice. Int J Radiat Biol. 2019;95(8):1178–1184. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1607605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid FA, El-Gendy AM, Zahkouk SA, et al. Ameliorative effect of two antioxidants on the liver of male albino rats exposed to electromagnetic field. EJHM. 2015;58(1):74–93. doi: 10.12816/0009363.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam R, Singh N, Singh U. Hematological changes induced by 3G mobile phone radiation in male Wistar rats. J Adv Sch Res Allied Educ. 2018;15(5):124–127. doi: 10.29070/15/57557.
   Google Scholar
• Dasdag S, Sert C, Akdag Z, et al. Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on hematologic and immunologic parameters in welders. Arch Med Res. 2002;33(1):29–32. doi: 10.1016/S0188-4409(01)00337-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hedendahl LK. Radiofrequency radiation from nearby base stations gives high levels in an apartment in Stockholm, Sweden: a case report. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(5):7871–7883. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortaz E, Alipoor SD, Adcock IM, et al. Update on neutrophil function in severe inflammation. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2171. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berek C. Eosinophils: important players in humoral immunity. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;183(1):57–64. doi: 10.1111/cei.12695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhuang YH, Kao TW, Peng TC, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as predictor for incident hypertension: a 9-year cohort study in Taiwan. Hypertens Res. 2019;42(8):1209–1214. doi: 10.1038/s41440-019-0245-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo JY, Suh CH, Jung JY, et al. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio could be a good diagnostic marker and predictor of relapse in patients with adult-onset still’s disease: a STROBE-compliant retrospective observational analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(29):e7546. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifat F, Saxena VK, Srivastava P, et al. Effects of 10 GHz MW exposure on hematological changes in Swiss albino mice and their modulation by prunus domestica fruit extract. Intern J Adv Res. 2014;2(2):386–396. doi: 10.1615/jenvironpatholtoxicoloncol.2013007891.
   Google Scholar
• Usman AD, Wan Ahmad WF, Ab Kadir MZA, et al. Effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on hematological parameters of mice. World Appl Sci J. 2012;16(5):656–664.
   Google Scholar
• Marzook EA, Marzook FA. Glutathione enhancer protects some biochemical and haematological parameters from the effect of electromagnetic field. Egypt J Rad Sci Appl. 2016;29(1–2):33–48. doi: 10.21608/ejrsa.2016.1577.
   Google Scholar
• Oloyede H, Atiq Z, Adigun R, et al. Protective effects of a locally-manufactured device on electromagnetic radiation-induced cellular alterations in rats exposed to mobile phone radiation. J Invest Biochem. 2017;6(1):11. doi: 10.5455/jib.20170215105236.
   Google Scholar
• Moradpour R, Shokri M, Abedian S, et al. F. The protective effect of melatonin on liver damage induced by mobile phone radiation in mice model. Int J Radiat Res. 2020;18(1):133–141. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.18.1.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar J. Pathophysiology of ischemic acute tubular necrosis. Clin Queries Nephrol. 2012;1(1):18–26. doi: 10.1016/s2211-9477(11)70006-1.
   Google Scholar
• Lotfi SA. Effect of electromagnetic radiation emitted from a mobile phone station on biochemical and histological structure of some rat organs. Isotope Radiation Res. 2011;43(1):95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Small DM, Gobe GC. Oxidative stress and antioxidant therapy in chronic kidney and cardiovascular disease. In: Oxidative stress and chronic degenerative diseases – a role for antioxidants. London, UK: Intech Open; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bin-Meferij MM, El-Kott AF. The radioprotective effects of Moringa oleifera against mobile phone electromagnetic radiation-induced infertility in rats. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):12487–12497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustafa YM, Moustafa RM, Belacy A, et al. Effects of acute exposure to the radiofrequency fields of cellular phones on plasma lipid peroxide and antioxidase activities in human erythrocytes. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2001;26(4):605–608. doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(01)00492-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasdag S, Bilgin HM, Akdag MZ, et al. Effect of long term mobile phone exposure on oxidative-antioxidative processes and nitric oxide in rats. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2008;22(4):992–997. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2008.10817595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winklhofer‐Roob BM. Oxygen free radicals and antioxidants in cystic fibrosis: the concept of an oxidant‐antioxidant imbalance. Acta Pædiatrica. 1994;83(s395):49–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13229.x.
   Google Scholar
• Møller P, Wallin H, Knudsen LE. Oxidative stress associated with exercise, psychological stress and life-style factors. Chem Biol Interact. 1996;102(1):17–36. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(96)03729-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompella A. Biochemistry and histochemistry of oxidant stress and lipid peroxidation. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1997;67(5):289–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Roe SL, Wyde ME, Stout MD, et al. Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2020;61(2):276–290. doi: 10.1002/em.22343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed WA, Ismail SA, El-Hakim YMA. Spirulina platensis ameliorative effect against GSM 900-MHz cellular phone radiation-induced genotoxicity in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Comp Clin Pathol. 2014;23(6):1719–1726. doi: 10.1007/s00580-014-2003-x.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, G, Anita. Genetic damage in mobile phone users: some preliminary findings. Indian J Hum Genet. 2005;11(2):99–104. doi: 10.4103/0971-6866.16810.
   Google Scholar
• Garaj-Vrhovac V, Gajski G, Pažanin S, et al. Assessment of cytogenetic damage and oxidative stress in personnel occupationally exposed to the pulsed microwave radiation of marine radar equipment. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2011;214(1):59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baohong W, Jiliang H, Lifen J, et al. Studying the synergistic damage effects induced by 1.8 GHz radiofrequency field radiation (RFR) with four chemical mutagens on human lymphocyte DNA using comet assay in vitro. Mutat Res. 2005;578(1–2):149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baohong W, Lifen J, Lanjuan L, et al. Evaluating the combinative effects on human lymphocyte DNA damage induced by ultraviolet ray C plus 1.8 GHz microwaves using comet assay in vitro. Toxicology. 2007;232(3):311–316. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2007.01.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldmann P, Bohnenberger S, Greinert R, et al. Influence of GSM signals on human peripheral lymphocytes: study of genotoxicity. Radiat Res. 2013;179(2):243–253. doi: 10.1667/RR2914.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeni O, Schiavoni A, Perrotta A, et al. Evaluation of genotoxic effects in human leukocytes after in vitro exposure to 1950 MHz UMTS radiofrequency field. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008;29(3):177–184. doi: 10.1002/bem.20378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari R, Lakshmi NK, Surender V, et al. Combinative exposure effect of radio frequency signals from CDMA mobile phones and aphidicolin on DNA integrity. Electromagn Biol Med. 2008;27(4):418–425. doi: 10.1080/15368370802473554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stronati L, Testa A, Moquet J, et al. 935 MHz cellular phone radiation. An in vitro study of genotoxicity in human lymphocytes. Int J Radiat Biol. 2006;82(5):339–346. doi: 10.1080/09553000600739173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz C, Kratochvil E, Pilger A, et al. Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (UMTS, 1,950 MHz) induce genotoxic effects in vitro in human fibroblasts but not in lymphocytes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008;81(6):755–767. doi: 10.1007/s00420-008-0305-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar