Risky business: medical students’ feedback-seeking behaviours: a mixed methods study

References

• Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, et al. Facilitated reflective performance feedback: developing an evidence-and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Acad Med. 2015;90(12):1698–15. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(5):609–614. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaunt. Surgical trainee feedback-seeking behavior in the context of workplace-based assessment in clinical settings. Acad Med. 2017;92(6):827–834. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten C, et al. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents’ feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Acad Med. 2009;84(7):910–917. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a858ad
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You R, Hayes V, Palka T, et al. Desperately seeking feedback: a phenomenographic study of medical students’ experiences during a 4-year longitudinal feedback curriculum. J Maine Med Center. 2022;4(1):3. doi: 10.46804/2641-2225.1101
   Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Könings KD, Mann KV, et al. About politeness, face, and feedback: exploring resident and faculty perceptions of how institutional feedback culture influences feedback practices. Acad Med. 2018;93(9):1348–1358. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ. Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: a resource perspective. Acad Manage J. 1986;29(3):465–487. doi: 10.2307/256219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedor DB, Rensvold RB, Adams SM. An investigation of factors expected to affect feedback seeking: a longitudinal field study. Personnel Psychol. 1992;45(4):779–802. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00968.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stogdill RM. Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire-Form XII. (No Title). 1963.
   Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D, Cummings LL. A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82(3):390. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajjawi R, Olson RE, McNaughton N. Emotion as reflexive practice: a new discourse for feedback practice and research. Med Educ. 2022;56(5):480–488. doi: 10.1111/medu.14700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Blatt R, Walle DV. Reflections on the looking glass: a review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. J Manage. 2003;29(6):773–799. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00079-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis HC, McCusker C, Hui CH. Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;59(5):1006. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Cummings LL. Feedback as an individual resource: personal strategies of creating information. Organ Behav Human Perform. 1993;32(3):370–398. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90156-3
   Google Scholar
• Sully De Luque MF, Sommer SM. The impact of culture on feedback-seeking behavior: an integrated model and propositions. Acad Manage Rev. 2000;25(4):829–849. doi: 10.2307/259209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis HC. The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. Am Psychologist. 1996;51(4):407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton VJ, Ali AH. Work-related values of managers: a test of the Hofstede model. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1990;21(1):109–118. doi: 10.1177/0022022190211005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer E, Driessen E, Mamat NH, et al. Educating universal professionals or global physicians? A multi-centre study of international medical programmes design. Med Teach. 2020;42(2):221–227. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1676885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges BD, Maniate JM, Martimianakis MA, et al. Cracks and crevices: globalization discourse and medical education. Med Teach. 2009;31(10):910–917. doi: 10.3109/01421590802534932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frambach JM, Driessen EW, Chan L, et al. Rethinking the globalisation of problem‐based learning: how culture challenges self‐directed learning. Med Educ. 2012;46(8):738–747. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04290.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D, Ganesan S, Challagalla GN, et al. An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior: disposition, context, and cognition. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(6):996. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck CS, Leggett EL. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychol Rev. 1998;95(2):256. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
   Google Scholar
• House RJ, Dessler G. The path-goal theory of leadership: some post hoc and a priori tests. Contingency Approaches To Leadership. 1974;29:55.
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handb Qual Res. 1994;2(163–194):105.
   Google Scholar
• Hall R. Mixed methods: In search of a paradigm. Conducting Research in a Changing and Challenging World. 2013,71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, et al. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Vol. 2013. Bethesda (Maryland): National Institutes of Health. 2011;541–545.
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp, LLC. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. 2021 (Version 17). College Station (TX); 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks J, McCluskey S, Turley E, et al. The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qual Res Psychol. 2015;12(2):202–222. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2014.955224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King N. Doing template analysis. Qual Organ Res Core Methods Curr Challenges. 2012;426.
   Google Scholar
• Moran-Ellis J, Alexander VD, Cronin A, et al. Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications. Qual Res. 2006;6(1):45–59. doi: 10.1177/1468794106058870
   Google Scholar
• Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6pt2):2134–2156. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, et al. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach. 2023;45(3):241–251. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV, et al. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017;51(1):40–50. doi: 10.1111/medu.13124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Newbury Park: Sage publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Katz R, Ogilvie S, Shaw J, et al. Gen Z, explained: the art of living in a digital age: London: University of Chicago Press; 2022
   Google Scholar
• Gemeda HK, Lee J. Leadership styles, work engagement and outcomes among information and communications technology professionals: a cross-national study. Heliyon. 2020;6(4). e03699. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziel RJ, Friedrich JC, Rudolph CW, et al. Age-differentiated leadership and healthy aging at work: evidence from the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(23):12509. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman EM, Young AJ. Motivation and strategy use in science: individual differences and classroom effects. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31(8):811–831. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660310805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Lima GM, Winsler A, Kitsantas A. Ethnic and gender differences in first-year college students’ goal orientation, self-efficacy, and extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. J Educ Res. 2014;107(5):341–356. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2013.823366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lempp H, Seale C. The hidden curriculum in undergraduate medical education: qualitative study of medical students’ perceptions of teaching. BMJ. 2004;329(7469):770–773. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7469.770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaufberg EH, Batalden M, Sands R, et al. The hidden curriculum: what can we learn from third-year medical student narrative reflections? Acad Med. 2010;85(11):1709–1716. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f57899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott KM, Caldwell PH, Barnes EH, et al. “Teaching by humiliation” and mistreatment of medical students in clinical rotations: a pilot study. Med J Aust. 2015;203(4):185–185. doi: 10.5694/mja15.00189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Mortel TF. Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2008;25(4):40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydor DT, Naik V, Friedman Z. Residents’ reluctance to challenge negative hierarchy in the operating room: a qualitative study. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(6):576. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0364-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, et al. Music lessons: revealing medicine’s learning culture through a comparison with that of music. Med Educ. 2013;47(8):842–850. doi: 10.1111/medu.12235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockyer J, Armson H, Könings KD, et al. In-the-moment feedback and coaching: improving R2C2 for a new context. J Grad Med Educ. 2020;12(1):27–35. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00508.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carless D, Boud D. The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 2018;43(8):1315–1325. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You R, Varaklis K, Hayes V, et al. The feedback tango: an integrative review and analysis of the content of the teacher–learner feedback exchange. Acad Med. 2018;93(4):657–663. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar