Advanced search
Publication Cover
Medical Education Online Volume 29, 2024 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
819
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Measuring teacher identity of physicians – a validation study of a questionnaire instrument

Ann-Kathrin Schindlera Medical Didactics and Education Research; DEMEDA (Department of Medical Education); Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2293-2357View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Mareike Schimmelb Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-4011View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Melissa Oezsoya Medical Didactics and Education Research; DEMEDA (Department of Medical Education); Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;c Education and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4243-2480View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Thomas Rotthoffa Medical Didactics and Education Research; DEMEDA (Department of Medical Education); Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5171-5941View further author information
ORCID Icon
Article: 2333618 | Received 27 Sep 2023, Accepted 18 Mar 2024, Published online: 25 Mar 2024

References

  • van Lankveld T, Thampy H, Cantillon P, et al. Supporting a teacher identity in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 132. Med Teach. 2021;43(2):124–11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838463
  • Cantillon P, Dornan T, De Grave W. Becoming a clinical teacher: identity formation in context. Acad Med. 2019;94(10):1610–1618. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002403
  • Dory V, Audétat MC, Rees C. Beliefs, identities and educational practice: a Q methodology study of general practice supervisors. Educ Primary Care. 2015;26(2):66–78. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2015.11494316
  • Steinert Y, Macdonald ME. Why physicians teach: giving back by paying it forward. Med Educ. 2015;49(8):773–782. doi: 10.1111/medu.12782
  • van Lankveld T, Schoonenboom J, Volman M, et al. Developing a teacher identity in the university context: a systematic review of the literature. High Educ Res Dev. 2017;36(2):325–342. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2016.1208154
  • Hanna F, Oostdam R, Severiens SE, et al. Domains of teacher identity: a review of quantitative measurement instruments. Educ Res Rev. 2019;27:15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.01.003
  • Starr S, Haley H-L, Mazor KM, et al. Initial testing of an instrument to measure teacher identity in physicians. Teach Learn Med. 2006;18(2):117–125. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1802_5
  • Starr S, Ferguson WJ, Haley H-L, et al. Community preceptors’ views of their identities as teachers. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):820–825. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200308000-00017
  • Sherman S, Kumar S, Lim J, et al. Measuring teacher identity during the transition from medical school to residency. Bayl Univ Med Cent Proc. 2020;33(4):566–571. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1792747
  • Behr D, Braun M, Dorer B. Measurement instruments in international surveys. Mannheim, Germany: GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences; 2016.
  • Association WM. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053
  • IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2021.
  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus: statistical analysis with latent variables: user’s guide (version 8). Los Angeles, CA; 2017.
  • Bühner M. Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Introduction to test and questionnaire development]. 3rd ed. Pearson Studium; 2011.
  • Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model: A Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res. 2003;8(2):23–74.
  • Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10(7). doi: 10.7275/jyj1-4868
  • Koller I, Levenson MR, Glück J. What do you think you are measuring? A mixed-methods procedure for assessing the content validity of test items and theory-based scaling. Front Psychol. 2017;8:126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00126

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.