998
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

How to design effective educational videos for teaching evidence-based medicine to undergraduate learners – systematic review with complementing qualitative research to develop a practicable guide

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2339569 | Received 24 Apr 2023, Accepted 03 Apr 2024, Published online: 14 Apr 2024

References

  • Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W, Kurz-Milcke E, et al. Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2007;8(2):53–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x
  • Wegwarth O, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, et al. Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A National Survey of primary care physicians in the United States. Ann internal med. 2012;156(5):340–U152. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-5-201203060-00005
  • Ahmadi S-F, Baradaran HR, Ahmadi E. Effectiveness of teaching evidence-based medicine to undergraduate medical students: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2015;37(1):21–30. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.971724
  • Weberschock T, Sorinola O, Thangaratinam S, et al. How to confidently teach EBM on foot: development and evaluation of a web-based e-learning course. Evid Based Med. 2013;18(5):170–172. doi: 10.1136/eb-2012-100801
  • Vaona A, Banzi R, Kwag KH, et al. E-learning for health professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(8). CD011736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011736.pub2
  • Chi DL, Pickrell JE, Riedy CA. Student learning outcomes associated with video vs. paper cases in a public health dentistry course. J Dent Educ. 2014;78(1):24–30. doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.1.tb05653.x
  • Murthykumar K, Veeraiyan DN, Prasad P. Impact of video based learning on the perfomance of post graduate students in biostatistics: a retrospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(12):ZC51–3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/15675.7004
  • Stockwell BR, Stockwell MS, Cennamo M, et al. Blended learning improves science education. Cell. 2015;162(5):933–936. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.009
  • Guo PJ, Kim J, Rubin R. How video production affects student engagement, In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference - L@S ’14; Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 2014. p. 41–50.
  • Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. Am Psychol. 2008;63(8):760–769. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760
  • Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning to medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44(6):543–549. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03624.x
  • Yue C, Kim J, Ogawa R, et al. Applying the cognitive theory of multimedia learning: an analysis of medical animations. Med Educ. 2013;47(4):375–387. doi: 10.1111/medu.12090
  • Lehmann R, Seitz A, Bosse HM, et al. Student perceptions of a video-based blended learning approach for improving pediatric physical examination skills. Ann Anat. 2016;208:179–182. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.05.009
  • Roshier AL, Foster N, Jones MA. Veterinary students’ usage and perception of video teaching resources. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-1
  • Brockfeld T, Muller B, de Laffolie J. Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results. Med Educ Online. 2018;23(1):1555434. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1555434
  • Higgins Joyce A, Raman M, Beaumont JL, et al. A survey comparison of educational interventions for teaching pneumatic otoscopy to medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1507-0
  • Suppan M, Stuby L, Carrera E, et al. Asynchronous Distance Learning of the National Institutes of Health stroke scale during the COVID-19 pandemic (E-Learning vs video): randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e23594. doi: 10.2196/23594
  • Yiu SHM, Spacek AM, Pageau PG, et al. Dissecting the contemporary clerkship: theory-based educational trial of videos versus lectures in medical student education. AEM Educ Train. 2020;4(1):10–17. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10370
  • Frankl SE, Joshi A, Onorato S, et al. Preparing future doctors for telemedicine: an asynchronous curriculum for medical students implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Med. 2021;96(12):1696–1701. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004260
  • Allen WC. Overview and Evolution of the ADDIE Training System. Adv Dev Hum Resour. 2006;8(4):430–441. doi: 10.1177/1523422306292942
  • Overbaugh RC. Research-based guidelines for computer-based instruction development. J Res Comput Educ. 1994;27(1):29–47. doi: 10.1080/08886504.1994.10782114
  • Mayer R, Moreno R. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ Psychol. 2003;38(1):43–52. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
  • Sweller J. Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In: Mayer RE, editor The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2005. pp. 19–30.
  • Brame CJ. Effective educational videos: principles and guidelines for maximizing Student learning from video content. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016;15(4):es6. doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
  • Dong C, Goh PS. Twelve tips for the effective use of videos in medical education. Med Teach. 2015;37(2):140–145. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.943709
  • Norman MK. Twelve tips for reducing production time and increasing long-term usability of instructional video. Med Teach. 2017;39(8):808–812. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1322190
  • Rana J, Besche H, Cockrill B. Twelve tips for the production of digital chalk-talk videos. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):653–659. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1302081
  • Iorio-Morin C, Brisebois S, Becotte A, et al. Improving the pedagogical effectiveness of medical videos. J Vis Commun Med. 2017;40(3):96–100. doi: 10.1080/17453054.2017.1366826
  • Young TP, Guptill M, Thomas T, et al. Effective educational videos in emergency medicine. AEM Educ Train. 2018;2(Suppl 1):S17–S24. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10210
  • Choe RC, Scuric Z, Eshkol E, et al. Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in asynchronous online lecture videos. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019;18(4):r55. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-08-0171
  • Raymond M, Iliffe S, Pickett J. Checklists to evaluate an e-learning resource. Educ Prim Care. 2012;23(6):458–459. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494162
  • Corbin JM, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol. 1990;13(1):3–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00988593
  • Strauss A, Corbin JM. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Denzin NK, and Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications; 1994. p. 273–285.
  • Strübing J. Grounded Theory. In: Bohnsack R, Flick U, Lüders C, editors. Qualitative Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2014.
  • Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt, Austria: Klagenfurt; 2014. p. 143.
  • Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 12th ed. Weinheim, Germany & Basel, Switzerland: Beltz; 2015.
  • Chen Y, Yang K, Marušic A, et al. A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(2):128–132. doi: 10.7326/M16-1565
  • Chen Y, Yang K, Marusic A, et al. RIGHT Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting practice guidelines. 2017.
  • Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CanMed Assoc J. 2010;182(18):E839–42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090449
  • Brouwers MC, Kerkvliet K, Spithoff K. The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016;352:i1152. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1152
  • AGREE Next Steps Consortium. The AGREE II Instrument [Electronic version]. 2017.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  • Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  • Sait S, Tombs M. Teaching medical students how to interpret chest X-Rays: the design and development of an e-Learning Resource. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021;12:123–132. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S280941
  • Mulcahy RS. Creating effective eLearning to help drive change. ACS Chem Health Saf. 2020;27(6):362–368. doi: 10.1021/acs.chas.0c00091
  • Fleming SE, Reynolds J, Wallace B. Lights… camera… action! a guide for creating a DVD/video. Nurse Educ. 2009;34(3):118–121. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181a0270e
  • Authement RS, Dormire SL. Introduction to the online nursing education best practices guide. Sage Open Nurs. 2020;6:2377960820937290. doi: 10.1177/2377960820937290
  • de Leeuw R, Scheele F, Walsh K, et al. A 9-step theory- and evidence-based postgraduate medical digital education development model: empirical development and validation. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(2):e13004. doi: 10.2196/13004
  • Cross A, Bayyapunedi M, Cutrell E, et al. Combining the benefits of handwriting and typeface in online educational videos. CHI 2013. 2013.
  • Wong G, Apthorpe HC, Ruiz K, et al. An innovative educational approach in using instructional videos to teach dental local anaesthetic skills. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;23(1):28–34. doi: 10.1111/eje.12382
  • Maloy J, Fries L, Laski F, et al. Seductive details in the flipped classroom: the impact of interesting but educationally irrelevant information on Student learning and motivation. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019;18(3):r42. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0004
  • Spreckelsen C, Juenger J. Repeated testing improves achievement in a blended learning approach for risk competence training of medical students: results of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1016-y
  • McCoy L, Lewis JH, Dalton D. Gamification and multimedia for medical education: a landscape review. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016;116(1):22–34. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.003
  • Adam M, McMahon SA, Prober C, et al. Human-centered design of video-based health education: an iterative, collaborative, community-based approach. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e12128. doi: 10.2196/12128
  • Phelan J. Ten tweaks that can improve your teaching. Am Biol Teach. 2016;78(9):725–732. doi: 10.1525/abt.2016.78.9.725
  • Jang HW, Kim KJ. Use of online clinical videos for clinical skills training for medical students: benefits and challenges. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):56. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-56
  • Margolis A, Porter A, Pitterle M. Best practices for use of blended learning. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017;81(3):81(3. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81349
  • Yavner SD, Pusic MV, Kalet AL, et al. Twelve tips for improving the effectiveness of web-based multimedia instruction for clinical learners. Med Teach. 2015;37(3):239–244. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.933202
  • RWTH Aachen University, Zahlenspiegel 2017. 2018.
  • Karic B, Moino V, Nolin A, et al. Evaluation of surgical educational videos available for third year medical students. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):1714197. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1714197
  • Chauvet P, Botchorishvili R, Curinier S, et al. What is a good teaching video? Results of an online international survey. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(3):738–747. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.05.023