Facilitators and barriers to online group work in higher education within health sciences – a scoping review

References

• Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, et al. Facilitating small group learning in the health professions. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(S2):457. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02282-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gillies R. Cooperative learning: review of research and practice. Australian J Teacher Educ. 2016;41(3):39–19. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou Y, Abrami PC, Spence JC, et al. Within-class grouping: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 1996;66(4):423–458. doi: 10.3102/00346543066004423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin RE. Research on cooperative learning and achievement: what we know, what we need to know. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1996;21(1):43–69. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RT, Johnson DW. An overview of cooperative learning. In: Thousand J, Villa A, and Nevin A, editors Creativity and collaborative learning. Baltimore: Brookes Press; 1994. p. 14.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson D, Johnson R, Roseth C, et al. The relationship between motivation and achievement in interdependent situations. J Appl Social Psychol. 2014;44(9):622–633. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith K. The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educ Psychol Rev. 2007;19(1):15–29. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammar Chiriac E. Group work as an incentive for learning – students’ experiences of group work. Frontiers In Psych. 2014; 5: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgour JM, Grundy L, Monrouxe LV. A rapid review of the factors affecting healthcare students’ satisfaction with small-group, active learning methods. Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(1):15–25. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1107484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong FMF. A phenomenological research study: perspectives of student learning through small group work between undergraduate nursing students and educators. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;68:153–158. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.013 PubMed PMID: rayyan-873491301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson D, Hickman LD, Power T, et al. Small group learning: graduate health students’ views of challenges and benefits. Contemp Nurse. 2014;48(1):117–128. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2014.11081933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapanta C, Botturi L, Goodyear P, et al. Online university teaching during and after the covid-19 crisis: refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Sci Educ. 2020;2(3):923–945. doi: 10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
   Google Scholar
• Donelan H, Kear K, Online group projects in higher education: persistent challenges and implications for practice. J Comput High Educ. 2023. doi: 10.1007/s12528-023-09360-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Ngampornchai A, Trail-Constant T, et al. Does a case-based online group project increase students’ satisfaction with interaction in online courses? Act Learning Higher Educ. 2016;17(3):249–260. doi: 10.1177/1469787416654800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron K, Melrose S, Online graduate study health care learners’ perceptions of group work and helpful instructional behaviors. J Educ Tech. 2006;3:71–77. doi: 10.26634/jet.3.1.1012
   Google Scholar
• Männistö M, Mikkonen K, Vuopala E, et al. Effects of a digital educational intervention on collaborative learning in nursing education: a quasi-experimental study. Nordic J Nursing Res. 2019;39(4):191–200. doi: 10.1177/2057158519861041
   Google Scholar
• Mannisto M, Mikkonen K, Kuivila H-M, et al. Digital collaborative learning in nursing education: a systematic review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2020;34(2):280–292. doi: 10.1111/scs.12743. PubMed PMID: rayyan-873489742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet Higher Educ. 2000;2(2–3):87–105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Stenbom S. A systematic review of the community of inquiry survey. Internet Higher Educ. 2018;39:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison DR. E-Learning in the 21st century: a community of inquiry framework for research and practice. New York: Routledge; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Castellanos-Reyes D. 20 years of the community of inquiry framework. TechTrends. 2020;64(4):557–560. doi: 10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caskurlu S, Richardson JC, Maeda Y, et al. The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: a thematic synthesis. Comput Educ. 2021;165:104111. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbage AK, Jia Y, Hoang T. The impact of community of inquiry and self-efficacy on student attitudes in sustained remote health professions learning environments. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04382-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin F, Wu T, Wan L, et al. A meta-analysis on the community of inquiry presences and learning outcomes in online and blended learning environments. Online Learning. 2022;26(1). doi: 10.24059/olj.v26i1.2604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh JB, Cleveland-Innes M, Diaz SR, et al. Developing a community of inquiry instrument: testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet Higher Educ. 2008;11(3):133–136. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann internal med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson JC, Maeda Y, Lv J, et al. Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: a meta-analysis. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;71:402–417. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clinical Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelhakim HE, Brown L, Mills L, et al. Medical and pharmacy students’ perspectives of remote synchronous interprofessional education sessions. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adwan J. Dynamic online peer evaluations to improve group assignments in nursing e-learning environment. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;41:67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose M, Murray L, Handoyo NE, et al. Learning global health: a pilot study of an online collaborative intercultural peer group activity involving medical students in Australia and Indonesia. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0851-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breen H. Assessing online collaborative discourse. Nurs Forum. 2015;50(4):218–227. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12091
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bristol TJ, Kyarsgaard V. Asynchronous discussion: a comparison of larger and smaller discussion group size. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2012;33(6):386–390. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-33.6.386
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bybee S, Supiano K, Wilson R. Utility and acceptability of a peer assessment rubric to improve interprofessional learning. J Nurs Educ. 2022;61(4):213–216. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20211128-07 PubMed PMID: rayyan-873487597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darici D, Reissner C, Brockhaus J, et al. Implementation of a fully digital histology course in the anatomical teaching curriculum during COVID-19 pandemic. Anat Anz. 2021;236:151718. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151718 PubMed PMID: rayyan-873487853.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson C, DiGiacomo M, Saliba B, et al. First year nursing students’ experiences of social media during the transition to university: a focus group study. Contemp Nurse. 2016;52(5):625–635. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2016.1205458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floren LC, Mandal J, Dall’era M, et al. A mobile learning module to support interprofessional knowledge construction in the health professions. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(2):239–249. doi: 10.5688/ajpe847519 PubMed PMID: rayyan-873488110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganotice FA, Chan L, Chow AYM, et al. What characterize high and low achieving teams in interprofessional education: a self-determination theory perspective. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;112:N.PAG–N.PAG. PubMed PMID: rayyan-873488165. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garratt-Reed D, Roberts LD, Heritage B. Grades, student satisfaction and retention in online and face-to-face introductory psychology units: a test of equivalency theory. Front psychol. 2016;7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George TP, Murphy PF, DeCristofaro C, et al. Student perceptions regarding collaborative intraprofessional nursing education. Nurse Educ. 2019;44(4):226–230. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George TP, Munn AC, Phillips TA. The use of debates in an online nursing course. Nurse Educ. 2021;46(4):E60–E3. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindarajan S, Rajaragupathy S. Online team based learning in teaching biochemistry for first year MBBS students during covid-19 pandemic. biochemistry and molecular biology education: a bimonthly publication of the international union of biochemistry and molecular biology. PubMed PMID: rayyan-873488500. 2022;50(1):124–129. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21598
   Google Scholar
• Hastuti AAMB, Noviana E, Siswanto S, et al. Implementing online team-based learning in an interuniversity setting: a case study of a traditional medicine course. Pharm Educ. 2022;22:558–568. doi: 10.46542/pe.2022.221.558568 PubMed PMID: rayyan-873488733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugland MJ, Rosenberg I, Aasekjær K. Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03232-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovlid E, Husabo G, Valestrand EA, et al. Learning team-based quality improvement in a virtual setting: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e061390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061390. PubMed PMID: rayyan-873488856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keynejad R, Ali FR, Finlayson AE, et al. Telemedicine for peer-to-peer psychiatry learning between U.K. and Somaliland medical students. Acad Psychiatry. 2013;37(3):182–186. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.11080148 PubMed PMID: rayyan-873489220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keynejad R, Garratt E, Adem G, et al. Improved attitudes to psychiatry: a global mental health peer-to-peer E-Learning partnership. Acad Psychiatry. 2016;40(4):659–666. doi: 10.1007/s40596-014-0206-8. PubMed PMID: rayyan-873489221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor PPK, Liu JYW, Kwan RYC. Exploring nursing students’ learning experiences and attitudes toward older persons in a gerontological nursing course using self-regulated online enquiry-based learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;111:105301. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon K, Liu Y-H, Johnson LP, et al. Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: comparison between good vs. poor collaborators. Comput Educ. 2014;78:185–200. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y-H, Kwon K, Johnson LP. Exploration of factors in the early collaboration phase affecting virtual groups’ overall collaborative learning experiences. J Educ Comput Res. 2018;56(4):485–512. doi: 10.1177/0735633117715034
   Google Scholar
• Mayordomo RM, Onrubia J. Work coordination and collaborative knowledge construction in a small group collaborative virtual task. Internet Higher Educ. 2015;25:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.003 PubMed PMID: rayyan-873489798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicklen P, Keating J, Paynter S, et al. Remote-online case-based learning: a comparison of remote-online and face-to-face, case-based learning - a randomized controlled trial. Educ Health. 2016;29(3):195–202. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.204213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Onrubia J, Rochera MJ, Engel A. Promover la regulación individual y grupal del aprendizaje en entornos colaborativos: una experiencia en Educación Superior. Electron J Res Educ Psychol. 2015;13(35):189–210. doi: 10.14204/ejrep.35.14058 PubMed PMID: EJ1060515.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer RH, Moulton MK, Stone RH, et al. The impact of synchronous hybrid instruction on students’ engagement in a pharmacotherapy course. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022;20(1):2611–2611. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.1.2611 PubMed PMID: rayyan-873490194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson AT, Roseth CJ. Effects of four CSCL strategies for enhancing online discussion forums: social interdependence, summarizing, scripts, and synchronicity. Int J Educ Res. 2016;76:147–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.009 PubMed PMID: rayyan-873490268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser M, Stephenson T, Mathur J, et al. Reflective practice and transcultural psychiatry peer e-learning between Somaliland and the UK: a qualitative evaluation. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond A, Jacob E, Jacob D, et al. Peer learning a pedagogical approach to enhance online learning: a qualitative exploration. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;44:165–169. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynault A, Lebel P, Brault I, et al. How interprofessional teams of students mobilized collaborative practice competencies and the patient partnership approach in a hybrid IPE course. J Interprof Care. 2021;35(4):574–585. PubMed PMID: rayyan-873490417. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1783217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogo EJ, Portillo KM. Building online learning communities in a graduate dental hygiene program. J Dental Hygiene. 2014;88(4): 213–228. PubMed PMID: rayyan-873490506.
   Google Scholar
• Ropero-Padilla C, Rodriguez-Arrastia M, Martinez-Ortigosa A, et al. A gameful blended-learning experience in nursing: a qualitative focus group study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;106:105109. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand J. Student perceptions of an undergraduate interprofessional capstone course including health information management. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2021;18(3):1j. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1377691. PubMed PMID: rayyan-873490587.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shimizu I, Matsuyama Y, Duvivier R, et al. Perceived positive social interdependence in online versus face-to-face team-based learning styles of collaborative learning: a randomized, controlled, mixed-methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03633-y PubMed PMID: rayyan-873490732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siah C-J, Huang C-M, Poon YSR, et al. Nursing students’ perceptions of online learning and its impact on knowledge level. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;112:105327. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trobec I, Starcic AI. Developing nursing ethical competences online versus in the traditional classroom. Nurs Ethics. 2015;22(3):352–366. doi: 10.1177/0969733014533241 PubMed PMID: rayyan-873491052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt MA, Schaffner BH. Evaluating interactive technology for an evolving case study on learning and satisfaction of graduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016;19:79–83. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.05.006 PubMed PMID: rayyan-873491164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolcott MD, Kornegay EC, Brame JL. Safe to speak: fostering psychological safety among incoming predoctoral dental students. J Dent Educ. 2022;86(7):863–873. PubMed PMID: rayyan-873491293. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita T, Osawa S, Ota K, et al. Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities. Med Educ Online. 2021;26(1):1886649. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1886649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison DR. Communities of inquiry in online learning. In: Rogers P, Berg G, Boettcher J, Howard C, Justice L Schenk K, editors Encyclopedia of distance learning. Second ed. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global; 2009. pp. 352–355.
   Google Scholar
• Akyol Z, Garrison DR. The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. J Asynchronous Learn Networks. 2008;12(3):3–22. doi: 10.24059/olj.v12i3.66
   Google Scholar
• Parmelee D, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, et al. Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e275–e87. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Brickman P, Tanner K. When group work doesn’t work: insights from students. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018;17(3):ar42. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199 PubMed PMID: 30183565; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6234829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME guide No. 23. Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e421–e44. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyzois I, Claffey N, Mattheos N. Problem-based learning in academic health education. A systematic literature review. Eur J Dent Educ. 2010;14(1):55–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2009.00593.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar