C ARDIAC A RREST M ANAGEMENT

References

• International Guidelines 2000 for CPR and FCC. A consensus on science. Resuscitation. 2000;46:1–447.
   Google Scholar
• The automated external defibrillator. Key link in the chain of survival. Circulation. 2000;102(suppl P:160–176.
   Google Scholar
• Skogvoll E, Sang°lt GK, Isern E, Gisvold SE. Out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a population-based Nor-wegian study of incidence and survival. Fur J Emerg Med. 1999;6:323–30.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela TD, Roe DJ, Cretin S, Spaite DW, Larsen MP. Estimating effective-ness of cardiac arrest interventions: a logistic regression survival model. Circulation. 1997;96:3308–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb LA, Fahrenbruch CE, Walsh TR, et al. Influence of cardiopulmonary resus-citation prior to defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrilla-tion. JAMA. 1999;281:1182–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiell IG, Wells GA, Field BJ, et al. Improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival through the inexpensive opti-mization of an existing defibrillation program: OPALS study phase II. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support. JAMA. 1999;281:1175–81.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs E, Callaham ML. Ability of laypersons to estimate short time inter-vals in cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 200035: 147–54.
   Google Scholar
• Wik L, Bircher NG, Safar P. A compari-son of prolonged manual and mechani-cal external chest compression after car-diac arrest in dogs. Resuscitation. 199632: 241–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sack JB, Kesselbrermer MB, Jarrad A. Interposed abdominal compression-cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitation outcome during asystole and electromechanical dissociation. Circulation. 1992;86:1692–700.
   Google Scholar
• Mauer D, Wolcke B, Dick W. Alterna-tive methods of mechanical cardiopul-monary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2000;44:81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Plaisance P, Lurie K, Vicaut E, et al. Comparison of standard cardiopul-monary resuscutation and active com-pression decompression for out-of-hos-pital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 1999341: 569–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye W, Mancini ME. Teaching adult resuscitation in the United States-time for a rethink. Resuscitation. 199837: 177–87.
   Google Scholar
• Wik L, Stee PA. The ventilation/com-pression ratio influences the effective-ness of two rescuer advanced cardiac life support on a manikin. Resuscitation. 199631: 113–9.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hoeyweghen RJ, Bossaert LL, Mullie A, et al. Quality and efficiency of bystander CPR. Belgian Cerebral Re-suscitation Study Group. Resuscitation. 1993;26:47–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang W, Weil MH, Sun S, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by pre-cordial compression but without mech-anical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150:1709–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noc M, Weil MH, Tang W, Turner T, Fukui M. Mechanical ventilation may not be essential for initial cardiopul-monary resuscitation. Chest. 1995;108: 821–7.
   Google Scholar
• Berg RA, Kern KB, Sanders AB, Otto CW, Hilwig RW, Ewy GA. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Is venti-lation necessary? Circulation. 1993;88: 1907–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins GD, Hulme J, Shore HR, Bion if. Basic life support training for health care students. Resuscitation. 1999;41:19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene HL, DiMarco JP, Kudenchuk PJ, et al. Comparison of monophasic and biphasic defibrillating pulse waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion. Bi-phasic Waveform Defibrillation Investi-gators. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:1135–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider T, Martens P, Paschen HR, et al. Prospective, randomized trial de-monstrating improved defibrillation and post-shock neurologic status after use of 150 J biphasic waveforms on car-diac arrest victims. Circulation. 1999; 100:1–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol G, Hallstrom AP, Kerber R, et al. American Heart Association report on the second public access defibrillation conference, April 17-19, 1997. Circula-tion. 1998;97:1309–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol G, Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, et al. Potential cost-effectiveness of public access defibrillation in the United States. Circulation. 1998;97:1315–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosesso VN Jr, Davis EA, Auble TE, Paris PM, Yealy DM. Use of automated external defibrillators by police officers for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 199832: 200–7.
   Google Scholar
• Levine RL, Wayne MA, Miller CC. End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:301–6.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel V, Lindner KH, Krismer AC, Miller EA, Voelckel WG, Lingnau W. Repeated administration of vasopressin but not epinephrine maintains coronary perfusion pressure after early and late administration during prolonged car-diopulmonary resuscitation in pigs. Circulation. 1999;99:1379–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Walraven C, Stiell IG, Wells GA, Herbert PC, Vandemheen K. Do advanced cardiac life support drugs increase resuscitation rates from in-hos-pital cardiac arrest? The OTAC Study Group. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32:544–53.
   Google Scholar
• Carvolth RD, Hamilton AJ. Comparison of high-dose epinephrine versus stan-dard-dose epinephrine in adult cardiac arrest in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996;11:219–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sherman BW, Munger MA, Foulke GE, et al. High-dose versus standard-dose epinephrine treatment of cardiac arrest after failure of standard therapy. Pharmacotherapy. 1997;17:242–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueugniaud PY, Mols P, Goldstein P, et al. A comparison of repeated high doses and repeated standard doses of epi-nephrine for cardiac arrest outside the hospital. European Epinephrine Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998339: 1595–601.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez ER, Kannewurf BS, Ornato JP. Intravenous amiodarone for ventricular arrhythmias: overview and clinical use. Resuscitation. 1998;39:33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kudenchuk PJ, Cobb LA, Copass MK, et al. Amiodarone for resuscitation after out of hospital cardiac arrest due to ven-tricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341:871–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark W, Norum B. Canadians extend chain of survival. AHA Currents. Winter 1999–2000:10.
   Google Scholar
• Kofler J, Sterz F, Hofbauer R, et al. Epinephrine application via an endotra-cheal airway and via the Combitube in esophageal position. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1445–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen BB,Mikkelsen SS.[Pharmacological routes of administra-tion in circulatory collapse]. Ugeskr Laeger. 1995;157:6864–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cummins RO, Chamberlain DA, Abramson NS, et al. Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Utstein Style. Task Force of the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Australian Re-suscitation Council. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:861–74.
   Google Scholar