References
- Domeier R. Indications for prehospital spinal immobilization [NAEMSP position paper]. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999;3: 251–3.
- Cordell WH, Hollingsworth JC, Olinger ML, Stroman SJ, Nelson DR. Pain and tissue interface pressures during spine-board immobilization. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26:31–6.
- Lovell ME, Evans JH. A comparison of the spinal board and the vacuum stretcher, spinal stability and interface pressure. Injury. 1994;5:179–80.
- Chan D, Goldberg R, Tascone A, et al. The effect of spinal immo-bilization on healthy volunteers. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;23:48–51.
- Hauswald M, Hsu M, Stockoff C. Maximizing comfort and min-imizing ischemia: a comparison of four methods of spinal immobilization. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000;4:250–2.
- Povy RW. A vacuum splint for use in orthopaedic operations. Br J Bone Joint Surg. 197052B:535–9.
- Rosen RB, Mcswain NE, Arata M et al. Comparison of two new immobilization collars. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:1189–95.
- Chan D, Goldberg R, Mason J, Chan L. Backboard versus mat-tress splint immobilization: a comparison of symptoms generat-ed. J Emerg Med. 1996;14:293–8.
- Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27: 485–9.
- Todd KH. Clinical versus statistical significance in the assess-ment of pain relief. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27:439–41.