Endotracheal Intubation Increases Out-of-Hospital Time in Trauma Patients

References

• Boyd D R, Cowley R A. Comprehensive regional trauma/ emergency medical services (EMS) delivery systems: the United States experience. World J Surg. 1983; 7(1)149–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges J R, Feero S, Moore B, et al. Factors contributing to paramedic onscene time during evaluation andmanagement of blunt trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 1988; 6(5)443–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs M, Davis D, Hoyt D, et al. Paramedic-performed rapid sequence intubation of patients with severe head injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40(2)159–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer C C, Christensen E F, Andersen N T. On-scene time in advanced trauma life support by anaesthesiologists. Eur J Emerg Med. 2006; 13(3)156–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gausche M, Lewis R J, Stratton S J, et al. Effect of out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation on survival andneurological outcome: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA. 2000; 283(6)783–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis D P, Stern J, Sise M J, et al. A follow-up analysis of factors associated with head-injury mortality after paramedic rapid sequence intubation. J Trauma. 2005; 59(2)486–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis D P, Ochs M, Hoyt D B, et al. Paramedic-administered neuromuscular blockade improves prehospital intubation success in severely head-injured patients. J Trauma. 2003; 55(4)713–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sloane C, Vilke G M, Chan T C, et al. Rapid sequence intubation in the field versus hospital in trauma patients. J Emerg Med. 2000; 19(3)259–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DiRusso S M, Sullivan T, Risucci D, et al. Intubation of pediatric trauma patients in the field: predictor of negative outcome despite risk stratification. J Trauma. 2005; 59(1)84–90, discussion 90–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochicchio G V, Ilahi O, Joshi M, et al. Endotracheal intubation in the field does not improve outcome in trauma patients who present without an acutely lethal traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2003; 54(2)307–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis D P, Hoyt D B, Ochs M, et al. The effect of paramedic rapid sequence intubation on outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2003; 54(3)444–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eckstein M, Chan L, Schneir A, et al. Effect of prehospital advanced life support on outcomes of major trauma patients. J Trauma. 2000; 48(4)643–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang H E, Peitzman A B, Cassidy L D, et al. Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation andoutcome after traumatic brain injury. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 44(5)439–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark D E, Anderson K L, Hahn D R. Evaluating an inclusive trauma system using linked population-based data. J Trauma. 2004; 57(3)501–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark D E, Hahn D R. Hospital trauma registries linked with population-based data. J Trauma. 1999; 47(3)448–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newgard C D. Validation of probabilistic linkage to match de-identified ambulance records to a state trauma registry. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13(1)69–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476)307–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royston P, Altman D. Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modeling. Applied Statistics. 1994; 43(3)429–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royston P, Sauerbrei W. A new approach to modelling interactions between treatment andcontinuous covariates in clinical trials by using fractional polynomials. Stat Med. 2004; 23(16)2509–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin D B, Schenker N. Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview andsome applications. Stat Med. 1991; 10(4)585–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little R, Yau L. Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal studies with drop-outs. Biometrics. 1996; 52(4)1324–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham J W, Schafer J. L. Statistical strategies for small sample research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Schafer J L, Graham J W. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002; 7(2)147–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman J C. Multiple imputation for missing data: What is it andhow can I use it?. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, April, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Newgard C D. The validity of using multiple imputation for missing out-of-hospital data in a state trauma registry. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13(3)314–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph L, Belisle P, Tamim H, et al. Selection bias found in interpreting analyses with missing data for the prehospital index for trauma. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004; 57(2)147–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morita S, Kobayashi K, Eguchi K, et al. Analysis of incomplete quality of life data in advanced stage cancer: a practical application of multiple imputation. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(6)1533–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore L, Lavoie A, LeSage N, et al. Multiple imputation of the Glasgow Coma Score. J Trauma. 2005; 59(3)698–704
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaffer M L, Chinchilli V M. Including multiple imputation in a sensitivity analysis for clinical trials with treatment failures. Contemp Clin Trials. 2006; 11(2)1–6
   Google Scholar
• Tang L, Song J, Belin T R, et al. A comparison of imputation methods in a longitudinal randomized clinical trial. Stat Med. 2005; 24(14)2111–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houck P R, Mazumdar S, Koru-Sengul T, et al. Estimating treatment effects from longitudinal clinical trial data with missing values: comparative analyses using different methods. Psychiatry Res. 2004; 129(2)209–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin D B. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 757–63, (8 Pt 2)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newgard C D, Hedges J R, Arthur M, et al. Advanced statistics: the propensity score–a method for estimating treatment effect in observational research. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11(9)953–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart M A, Schneeweiss S, Rothman K J, et al. Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163(12)1149–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakhry S M, Scanlon J M, Robinson L, et al. Prehospital rapid sequence intubation for head trauma: conditions for a successful program. J Trauma. 2006; 60(5)997–1001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang H E, Yealy D M. Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation: where are we?. Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 47(6)532–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones J H, Murphy M P, Dickson R L, et al. Emergency physician-verified out-of-hospital intubation: miss rates by paramedics. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11(6)707–09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz S H, Falk J L. Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 37(1)32–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aufderheide T P, Lurie K G. Death by hyperventilation: a common andlife-threatening problem during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32: S345–51, (9 Suppl)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abo B, Wang H., Hostler D. Does the type of out-of-hospital airway interfere with other cardiopulmonary resuscitation tasks?. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: S55, (5 Supplement 1)
   Google Scholar