References
- Stewart R D, Paris P M, et al. Field endotracheal intubation by paramedical personnel. Success rates andcomplications. Chest 1984; 85: 341–5
- Gausche M, Lewis R J, et al. Effect of out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation on survival andneurological outcome: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA 2000; 283(6)783–90
- Davis D P, Ochs M, et al. The effect of paramedic rapid sequence intubation on outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10(5)446–7
- Davis D P, Dunford J V, et al. The impact of hypoxia andhyperventilation on outcome after paramedic rapid sequence intubation of severely head-injured patients. J Trauma 2004; 57(1)1–8, discussion 8-10
- Agro F, Frass M, et al. Current status of the Combitube: a review of the literature. J Clin Anesth 2004; 14(4)307–14
- Hulme J, Perkins G D. Critically injured patients, inaccessible airways, andlaryngeal mask airways. Emerg Med J 2005; 22(10)742–4
- McManus J G, Parsons D, et al. Combat trauma airway management: Combitube versus the King Laryngeal Tracheal Device by army combat medic students. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 162, (5, suppl_1)
- Hagberg C, Bogomolny Y, et al. An evaluation of the insertion andfunction of a new supraglottic airway device, the King LT, during spontaneous ventilation. Anesth Analg 2006; 102(2)621–5
- Galtini L, Vaida S J, et al. An evaluation of the laryngeal tube during general anesthesia using mechanical ventilation. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1750–5
- Fowler R. King LT-D to the rescue. JEMS 2005; 30(7)90, 92