References
- Niemann J T, Burian D, Garner D, Lewis R J. Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model. J Am Coll Card 2000; 36: 932–938
- Leng C T, Paradis N A, Calkins H, et al. Resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation with use of monophasic andbiphasic waveform pulses for external defibrillation. Circulation 200; 101: 2968–2974
- Szili-torok T, Theuns D, Verblaauw T, et al. Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear andmonophasic damped sine shocks. Acta Cardiol 2002; 57(5)329–334
- Higgins S L, Herre J M, Epstein A E, et al. A comparison of biphasic andmonophasic shocks for external defibrillation. Prehosp Emerg Care 2000; 4: 305–313
- Higgins S L, O'Grady S, Banville I, et al. Efficacy of lower energy biphasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a follow-up clinical study. Prehosp Emerg Care 2004; 8: 262–267
- White R D. Waveforms for defibrillation andcardioversion: recent experimental andclinical studies. Curr Opin Crit Care 2004; 10: 202–207
- Hong M F, Dorian P. Update on advanced life support andresuscitation techniques. Curr Opin Cardiiol 2004; 20: 1–6
- Faddy S C, Powell J, Craig J. Biphasic andmonophasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Resuscitation 2003; 58: 9–16
- White R D, Hankins D G, Atkinson E J. Patient outcomes following defibrillation with a low energy biphasic truncated exponential waveform in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2001; 49: 9–14
- Kudenchuk P J, et al. Transthoracid incremental monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation by emergency responders (TIMBER). Circulation 2006; 114: 2010–2018
- Task force of representatives from the European Resuscitation Council, American Heart Association, Heart andStroke Foundation of Canada, Australian Resuscitation Council. Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the “Utstein style.”. Resuscitation 1991; 8: 1–26
- Schneider T, Martens PR, Paschen H, et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 150 J biphasic shocks compared with 200- to 360-J monophasic shocks in the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. Optimized Response to Cardiac Arrest (ORCA) Investigators. Circulation 2000; 102: 1780–1787
- Van Alem A P, et al. A prospective, randomized, andblinded comparison of first shock success of monophasic andbiphasic waveforms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2003; 58: 17–24
- Stothert J C, Hatcher T S, Gupton C L, et al. Rectilinear biphasic waveform defibrillation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Out-of-Hospital Emerg Care 2004; 8: 388–392
- Carpenter J, et al. Defibrillation waveform andpost-shock rhythm in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2003; 59: 189–196
- Morrison L, Dorian P, Long J, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT). Resuscitation 2005; 66: 149–157
- Tang W, Weil M H, Sun S, et al. A comparison of biphasic andmonophasic waveform defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Chest 2001; 120: 948–954
- Jones J L, Tovar O H. Electrophysiology of ventricular fibrillation anddefibrillation. Crit Care Med 2000; 28(Suppl.)N219–N221
- White R D. New concepts in transthoracic defibrillation. Emerg Med Clin N Am 2002; 20: 785–807
- Walcott G P, Killingsworth C R, Ideker R E. Do clinically relevant transthoracic defibrillation energies cause myocardial damage anddysfunction?. Resuscitation 2003; 59: 59–70