Biphasic truncated exponential waveform defibrillation

References

• White RD. Early out-of-hospital experi-ence with an impedance-compensating low-energy biphasic waveform auto-matic external difibrillator. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1997;1:203–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gliner BE, White RD. Post-shock ECG rhythm classification following out-of-hospital low-energy impedance-com-pensating biphasic and high-energy monophasic defibrillation shocks [ab-stract]. Circulation. 1998;98J-173-1-17.3. Gliner BE, White RD. Recurrence of out-of-hospital VF following low-energy biphasic and high-energy monophasic defibrillation shocks [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:127A.
   Google Scholar
• Gliner BE, White RD. Electrocardio-graphic evaluation of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sud-den cardiac arrest patients. Resuscita-tion. 1999;41:1.29–40.
   Google Scholar
• White RD, Hankins DG, Bugliosi TF. Seven years' experience with early de-fibrillation by police and paramedics in an emergency medical services system. Resuscitation. 1998;39:145–51.
   Google Scholar
• Poole JE, White RD, Kanz K-G, et al. Low-energy impedance-compensating biphasic waveforms terminate ventricu-lar fibrillation at high rates in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Cardio-vasc Electrophysiol. 1997;7.:1373-85. Gliner BE, Jorgenson DB, Poole JE, et al. Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac ar-rest with a low-energy impedance-com-pensating biphasic waveform automatic external defibrillator. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1998;32: 631–44.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan BR, Kavanagh PR, Smith DL, Fales WD. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic automated external defib-rillators: preliminary results [abstract]. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999;3:79.
   Google Scholar
• Ossmann E, Sasser S, Blackwell T. Biphasic external defibrillation in an ur-ban EMS system [abstract]. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999;3:85–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bardy CH, Marchlinski FE, Sharma AD, et al. Multicenter comparison of trun-cated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrilla-tion. Circulation. 1996;94:2507–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herre JM, Higgins SL, Epstein AE, et al. A comparison of biphasic and mono-phasic shocks for external defibrillation of humans [abstract]. Circulation. 1998; 98:1–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal S, Ayati S, Stein KM, et al. Com-parison of a novel biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation [abstract]. J Am Coll Car-diol. 1999;33:105A.
   Google Scholar
• White RD. External defibrillation: the need for uniformity in analyzing and re-porting results. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 32:234–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokano T, Bach D, Chang J, et al. Effect of ventricular shock strength on cardiac hemodynamics. J Cardiovasc Electro-physiol. 1998;9:791–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie J, Weil MH, Sun S, et al. High-energy defibrillation increases the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunc-tion. Circulation. 1997;96:683–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattana J, Singhal PC. Determinants of elevated creatine kinase activity and cre-atine kinase MB-fraction following cardipulmonary resuscitation. Chest. 1992;101:1386–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osswald S, Trouton TG, O'Nunain SS, Holden HB, Ruskin JN, Garan H. Rela-tion between shock-related myocardial injury and defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and biphasic shocks in a ca-nine model. Circulation. 1994;90:2501–9.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver WD, Cobb LA, Copass MK, Hallstrom AP. Ventricular defibrilla-tion-a comparative trial using 1754 and 320-J shocks. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1101–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang W, Weil MH, Sun S, et al. Defibril-lation with low-energy biphasic wave-form reduces the severity of post-resus-citation myocardial dysfunction after prolonged cardiac arrest [abstract]. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:A43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang W, Weil MH, Sun S, et al. The ef-fects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on post resus-citation myocardial function. J Am Coll Cardiol. (in press, 1999).Suggested Reading
   Google Scholar
• Nichol G, Hallstrom AP, Kerber R, et al. American Heart Association report on the Second Public Access Defibrillation Conference, April 17-19,1997. Circula-tion. 1998;97:1309–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins RO, Hazinski MF, Kerber RE, et al. Low-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation: evidence-based review applied to emergency cardiovascular care guidelines. Circulation. 1998;97: 1654–67.
   Google Scholar
• White RD, Vukov LF, Bugliosi TF. Early defibrillation by police: initial experi-ence with measurement of critical timeintervals and patient outcome. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23:1009–13.
   Google Scholar
• White RD, Asplin BR, Bugliosi TF, Han-kins DG. High discharge survival rate after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrilla-tion with rapid defibrillation by police and paramedics. Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 28:480–5.
   Google Scholar
• White RD, Hankins DG, Bugliosi TF. Seven years' experience with early de-fibrillation by police and paramedics in an emergency medical services system. Resuscitation. 1998;39:145–51.
   Google Scholar
• White RD. External defibrillation: the need for uniformity in analyzing and re-porting results. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 32:234–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole JE, White RD, Kanz K-G, et al. Low-energy impedance-compensating biphasic waveforms terminate ventricu-lar fibrillation at high rates in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Cardio-vasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8:1373–85.
   Google Scholar
• White RD. Early out-of-hospital experi-ence with an impedance-compensating low-energy biphasic waveform auto-matic external defibrillator. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1997;1:203–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gliner BE, Jorgenson DB, Poole JE, et al. Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac ar-rest with a low-energy impedance-com-pensating biphasic waveform automatic external defibrillator. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1998;32:631–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caterine MR, Spencer KT, Pagan-Carlo LA, Smith RS, Buettner GR, Kerber RE. Direct current shocks to the heart gener-ate free radicals: an electron paramag-netic resonance study. J Am Coll Car-diol. 1996;28:1598–609.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman BB, Engelstein ED. Increased defibrillation threshold due to ventricu-lar fibrillation duration. Potential mech-anisms. J Electrocardiol. 1995;28:21–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart AJ, Allen JD, Adgey AAJ. Fre-quency analysis of ventricular fibrilla-tion and resuscitation success. QJM. 1992;85:761–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tacker WA, Geddes LA. The laws of electrical stimulation of cardiac tissue. Proc IEEE. 1996;84:355–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbonnier FM. External defibrillators and emergency external pacemakers. Proc IEEE. 1996;84:487–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JL, Jones RE, Balasky G. Microlesion formation in myocardial cells by high-in-tensity electric field stimulation. Am J Physiol. 1987;253(2 pt 2):H480–H486.
   Google Scholar
• Bardy CH, Marchlinski FE, Sharma AD, et al. Multicenter comparison of trun-cated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrilla-tion. Circulation. 1996;94:2507–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliner BE, Lyster TE, Dillon SM, Bardy CH. Transthoracic defibrillation of swine with monophasic and biphasic wave-forms. Circulation. 1995;92:1634–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy RK, Gleva MJ, Gliner BE, et al. Biphasic transthoracic defibrillation causes fewer ECG ST-segment changes after shock. Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 30:127–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walcott GP, Knisley SB, Zhou X, New-ton JC, Ideker RE. On the mechanism of ventricular defibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997;20:422–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walcott GP, Melnick SB, Chapman FW, Jones JL, Smith VM, Ideker RE. Relative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrilla-tion after short and long durations of ven-tricular fibrillation. Circulation. 1998;98: 2210–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwaku KF, Dillon SM. Shock-induced depolarization of refractory myocar-dium prevents wave-front propagation in defibrillation. Circ Res. 1996;79:957–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon SM. The electrophysiology of ventricular defibrillation: today and yes-terday. In: Allessie MA, Fromer M (eds). Atrial and Ventricular Fibrillation: Mechanisms and Device Therapy. Ar-monk, NY: Futura Publishing Co., 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon SM, Kwaku KF. Progressive de-polarization: a unified hypothesis for defibrillation and fibrillation induction by shocks. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9:529–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JL, Tovar OH. The mechanism of defibrillation and cardioversion. Proc IEEE. 1996;84:392–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JL, Tovar OH. Threshold reduc-tion with biphasic defibrillator wave-forms. Role of charge balance. J Electro-cardiol. 1995;28:25–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tovar OH, Jones JL. Biphasic defibrilla-tion waveforms reduce shock-induced response duration dispersion between low and high shock intensities. Circ Res. 1995;77:430–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones JL, Swatz JF, Jones RE, Fletcher R. Increasing fibrillation duration en-hances relative asymmetrical biphasic versus monophasic defibrillator wave-form efficacy. Circ Res. 1990;67:376–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkle RA, Mead RH, Ruder MA, et al. Improved low energy defibrillation effi-cacy in man with the use of a biphasic truncated exponential waveform. Am Heart J. 1989;117:122–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney RJ, Gill RM, Steinberg MI, Reid PR. Ventricular refractory period exten-sion caused by defibrillation shocks. Cir-culation. 1990;82:965–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behr JC, Hartley LL, York DK, Brown DD, Kerber RE. Truncated exponential versus damped sinusoidal waveform for transthoracic defibrillation. Am J Car-diol. 1996;78:1242–5.
   Google Scholar
• Greene HL, DiMarco JP, Kudenchuk PJ, et al. Comparison of monophasic and biphasic defibrillating pulse waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:1135–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windecker S, Kay GN, KenKnight BH,Walcott GP, Smith WM, Ideker RE. The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and a preceding unsuccessful shock on the probability of defibrillation success using biphasic waveforms in pigs. J Car-diovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8:1386–95.
   Google Scholar
• Walcott GP, Walcott KT, Knisley SB, Zhou X, Ideker RE. Mechanisms of de-fibrillation for monophasic and biphasic waveforms. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994;17:478–498.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweeney RJ, Gill RM, Reid PR. Refrac-tory interval after transcardiac shocks during ventricular fibrillation. Circula-tion. 1996;94:2947–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gliner BE, White RD. Electrocardio-graphic evaluation of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sud-den cardiac arrest patients. Resuscita-tion. 1999;41:133–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie J, Weil MH, Sun S, et al. High-energy defibrillation increases the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunc-tion. Circulation. 1997;96:683–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokano T, Bach D, Chang J, et al. Effect of ventricular shock strength on cardiac hemodynamics. J Cardiovasc Electro-physiol. 1998;9:791–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osswald S, Trouton TG, O'Nunain SS, Holden HB, Ruskin JN, Garan H. Rela-tion between shock-related myocardial injury and defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and biphasic shocks in a ca-nine model. Circulation. 1994;90:2501–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kerber RE, Kouba CK, Martins J, et al. Advance prediction of transthoracic im-pedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-en-ergy shocks. Circulation. 1984;70:303–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber RE, Martins JB, Kienzle MG, et al. Energy, current, and success in defibril-lation and cardioversion: clinical studies using an automated impedance-based method of energy adjustment. Circula-tion. 1988;77:1038–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber RE. Editorial comment concern-ing "Early out-of-hospital experience with an impedance-compensating low-energy biphasic waveform automatic external defibrillator." J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1997;1:209–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kerber RE, Becker LB, Bourland JD, et al. Automatic external defibrillators for public access defibrillation: recommen-dations for specifying and reporting ar-rhythmia analysis algorithm perfor-mance, incorporating new waveforms, and enhancing safety: a statement for health professionals from the AHATask Force on Automatic External De-fibrillation, Subcommittee on AED Safety and Efficacy. Circulation. 1997; 95:1677–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins RO, Hazinski MF, Kerber RE, et al. Low-energy biphasic waveform de-fibrillation: evidence-based review ap-plied to emergency cardiovascular care guidelines. Circulation. 1998;97:1654–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weaver WD, Copass MK, Hill DL, Fahrenbruch C, Hallstrom AP, Cobb LA. Cardiac arrest treated with a new auto-matic external defibrillator by out-of-hospital first responders. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57:1017–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver WD, Cobb LA, Copass MK, Hallstrom AP. Ventricular defibrilla-tion-a comparative trial using 175-J and 320-J shocks. N Engl J Med. 1982; 307:1101–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver WD, Hill DL, Fahrenbruch C, et al. Automatic external defibrillators: im-portance of field testing to evaluate per-formance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10: 1259–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver WD, Hill D, Fahrenbruch CE, et al. Use of the automatic external defib-rillator in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:661–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar