Initial Validity Evidence for the Youth Interpersonal Behaviors Questionnaire in Sport (Y-IBQ)

References

• Al-Janabi, H., Keeley, T., Mitchell, P., & Coast, J. (2013). Can capabilities be self-reported? A think aloud study. Social Science and Medicine, 87, 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, A. M., Smith, M. H., White, A. S., Hawley, L., & Koziol, N. A. (2017). Age-sensitive instrument design for youth: A developmental approach. Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families and Schools. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590480.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1459–1473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211413125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: Assessing the darker side of athletic experience. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.1.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2010). The controlling interpersonal style in a coaching context: Development and initial validation of a psychometric scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.2.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (2007). Designing and testing questionnaires for children. Journal of Research in Nursing, 12(5), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987107079616
   Google Scholar
• Blair, J., & Brick, P. D. (2010). Methods of the analysis of cognitive interviews. In Proceedings of the section on survey research methods (Vol. 2010, pp. 3739–3748). Alexandria: American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Borgers, N., de Leeuw, E., & Hox, J. (2000). Children as respondents in survey research: Cognitive development and response quality 1. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 66(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/075910630006600106
   Google Scholar
• Borgers, N., & Hox, J. (2000). Reliability of responses in questionnaire research with children [CD-Rom. In J. Blasius, J. Hox, E. de Leeuw, & P. Schmidt (Eds.), Social science methodology in the new millennium (pp. 1–46). Leske + Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Borgers, N., Hox, J., & Sikkel, D. (2004). Response effects in surveys on children and adolescents: The effect of number of response options, negative wording, and neutral mid-point. Quality and Quantity, 38(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUQU.0000013236.29205.a6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1972). Oblique rotation to a partially specified target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25(2), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1972.tb00492.x
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(1), 111–150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté, J., & Fraser-Thomas, J. (2007). Youth involvement in sport. In P. R. E. Crocker (Ed.), Sport psychology: A Canadian perspective (pp. 266–294). Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, T., Hill, A. P., Hall, H. K., & Jowett, G. E. (2014). Perceived coach behaviors and athletes’ engagement and disaffection in youth sport: The mediating role of the psychological needs. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 45(6), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.7352/IJSP2014.45.559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, T., Hill, A. P., Ntoumanis, N., Hall, H. K., & Jowett, G. E. (2016). A three-wave longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s mediation model of engagement and disaffection in youth sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
   Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, E. D. (2011). Improving data quality when surveying children and adolescents: Cognitive and social development and its role in questionnaire construction and pretesting. Report presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Finland: Research Programs Public Health Challenges and Health and Welfare of Children and Young People, May 10-12, Naantali, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 439–492). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, M. (2009). The reliability of children’s survey responses: The impact of cognitive functioning on respondent behavior. In Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 2008, Ottawa, Ontario (Vol. 11, pp. 522–530).
   Google Scholar
• Gould, D. (2019). The current youth sport landscape: Identifying critical research issues. Kinesiology Review, 8(3), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2019-0034
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. M., Guthrie, A. C., & Thompson, B. (2003). Consequences of not interpreting structure coefficients in published CFA research: A reminder. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., & French, B. F. (2013). Power analysis in covariance structure models. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 117–159). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. H. C. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Past and present. A festschrift in honor of Karl G. Jöreskog (pp. 195–261). Scientific Software International, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, T. (2008). Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (pp. 239–267). Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In J. D. Wright & P. V. Marsden (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed., pp. 263–313). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• LaPietra, E., Urban, J. B., & Linver, M. R. (2020). Using cognitive interviewing to test youth survey and interview items in evaluation: A case example. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 16(37), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i37.651
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach–athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(11), 883–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000140374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1970). The theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1970.tb00432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossman, L. H., Slemp, G. R., Lewis, K. J., Colla, R. H., & O’Halloran, P. (2022). Autonomy support in sport and exercise settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2022.2031252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations: Presidential address to the psychometric society. Psychometrika, 54(4), 557–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02296397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, N. D., Ahn, S., & Jin, Y. (2013). Rotation to a partially specified target matrix in exploratory factor analysis: How many targets? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.742399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. D., Celimli, S., Martin, J. J., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). Sample size determination and power estimation in structural equation modeling. In N. Ntoumanis & N. D. Myers (Eds.), An introduction to intermediate and advanced statistical analyses for sport and exercise scientists (pp. 267–284). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, N. D., Jin, Y., Ahn, S., Celimli, S., & Zopluoglu, C. (2015). Rotation to a partially specified target matrix in exploratory factor analysis in practice. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 494–505. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0486-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. D., Ntoumanis, N., Gunnell, K. E., Gucciardi, D. F., & Lee, S. (2018). A review of some emergent quantitative analyses in sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 70–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. D., Pacewicz, C. E., Hill, C. R., & Chun, H. (2023). Factor analysis with ordered categorical indicators and measurement of self-efficacy in physical activity contexts: A substantive-methodological synergy. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 1–20. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2186789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntoumanis, N. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on motivation in sport and physical education: Current trends and possible future directions. In G. Roberts & D. Treasure, Eds., 3rd, Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 91–128). Human Kinetics. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781492595182.ch-003
   Google Scholar
• Patel, P., Lee, S., Myers, N. D., & Lee, M.-H. (2021). Missing data reporting and analyzing practices in motor learning and development: A systematic review of past and present practices. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 9(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2020-0018
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Coffman, D. L. (2006, May). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://quantpsy.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rocchi, M., & Pelletier, L. (2018). How does coaches’ reported interpersonal behavior align with athletes’ perceptions? Consequences for female athletes’ psychological needs in sport. Sport, Exercise, & Performance Psychology, 7(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocchi, M., Pelletier, L., Cheung, S., Baxter, D., & Beaudry, S. (2017). Assessing need-supportive and need-thwarting interpersonal behaviors: The Interpersonal Behaviors Questionnaire (IBQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocchi, M., Pelletier, L., & Couture, A. L. (2013). Determinants of coach motivation and autonomy supportive coaching behaviors. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(6), 852–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocchi, M., Pelletier, L., & Desmarais, P. (2017). The validity of the Interpersonal Behaviors Questionnaire (IBQ) in sport. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 21(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2016.1242488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottensteiner, C., Tolvanen, A., Laakso, L., & Konttinen, N. (2015). Youth athletes’ motivation, perceived competence, and persistence in organized team sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 38(4), 432–449.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
   Google Scholar
• Silva, J. R., Fera, B., Sudula, S., Koetzle, D., & Schwalbe, C. (2019). Cognitive interviewing to improve questionnaire for justice-involved youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(10), 1931–1951. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19839597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, C., Lonsdale, C., Dimmock, J., & Jackson, B. (2017). An intervention to improve teachers’ interpersonally involving instructional practices in high school physical education: Implications for student relatedness support and in-class experiences. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 39(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2016-0198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive science and survey methods. In T. Jabine, M. Straf, J. Xanur, & R. Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines (pp. 73–100). National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wekesser, M., Harris, B. S., Langdon, J., & Wilson, C. H. (2021). Coaches’ impact on youth athletes’ intentions to continue sport participation: The mediational influence of the coach–athlete relationship. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 16(3), 490–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954121991817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z. R., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, G. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, G. (2012). Cognitive interviewing training guide. Retrieved from https://www.hkr.se/contentassets/9ed7b1b3997e4bf4baa8d4eceed5cd87/gordonwillis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, M., Bowen, G. L., & Bowen, N. K. (2004). Cognitive pretesting and the developmental validity of child self-report instruments: Theory and applications. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731503257882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). 5. Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar