Quality of Care in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Clients' Perceptions, ADL Dependence, and Subjective Well-being in a One-year Perspective

References

• Borgquist L. Hip fracture patients in primary health care. Rehabilitation, outcome and costs. Doctoral dis- sertation. Lund, Sweden: Departments of Orthopedics and Community Health Sciences, Lund University, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bonair A, Andre´n KG. AÈdel 50-anslaget (in Swedish). Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift 1997; 74: 272–276.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson L. AÈldreomsorgen fo¨ re och efter Ådelreformen (in Swedish). Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift 1997; 74: 277–283.
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S Nygren C, sacsson Å Dehlin O. Staff and administration perspectives of a geriatric rehabili-tation developmental process. Scand J Car Sci 1999; 13: 240–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath JR, Davis AM. Rehabilitation: Where are we going and how do we get there? Clin Rehabil 1992; 6: 225–235.
   Google Scholar
• Weber DC, Fleming KC, Evans JM. Rehabilitation of geriatric patients. Mayo Clin Proc 1995; 70: 1198–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, CAOT. Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, Canada: CAOT, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren C, Iwarsson S, Dehlin O. Exploration of sub- jective well-being and dependence in daily activities at the beginning of the geriatric rehabilitation process: A challenge to traditional goal-setting and evaluation procedures? Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2000; 30: 173–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Isacsson ÅQuality of Life in the elderly population: An example exploring interrelationships among subjective well-being, ADL dependence, and housing accessibility. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1997; 26: 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Sernbo I, Johnell O. Consequences of a hip fracture: A prospective study over 1 year. Osteoporos Int 1993; 3: 148–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juby LC, Lincoln NB, Berman P. The effect of a stroke rehabilitation unit on functional and psycholog- ical outcome. Cereb Dis 1996; 6: 106–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ro¨nning OM, Guldvog B. Outcome of subacute stroke rehabilitation. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 1998; 29: 779 –784.
   Google Scholar
• Po¨ssl J, Cramon YV. Clients’ view of neuropsychological rehabilitation. Brain Inj 1996; 10: 125–132.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley CB. A functional outcome-based approach to evaluate the quality of geriatric rehabilitation. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 1994; 12: 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Stineman MG, Maislin G, Williams SV. Applying quantitative methods to the prediction of full recovery in adult rehabilitation patients. Arch Phys Med Reha- bil 1993; 74: 787–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Fabio RP, Choi T, Soderberg J, Hansen CR. Health-related quality of life for patients with progres- sive multiple sclerosis: Influence of rehabilitation. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 1704–1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King RB. Quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1996; 27: 1467–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashkow P. Outcomes in cardiopulmonary rehabilita- tion. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 643–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S. Environmental influences on the cumula- tive structure of instrumental ADL: An example in osteoporosis patients in a Swedish rural district. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran WG. Sampling techniques, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Sonn U, Hulter-AÍ sberg K. Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly. Scand J Rehabil Med 1991;23: 193–202. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185: 914–919.
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Isacsson Å On scaling methodology and environmental influences in disability assessments: The cumulative structure of personal and instrumental ADL among older adults in a Swedish rural district. Can J Occup Ther 1997; 64: 240–251.
   Google Scholar
• McIver JP, Carmines EG. Unidimensional scaling. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applica- tions in the Social Sciences, 24. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Inc, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman LL. The basis of scalogram analysis. In: Stouffer SA, et al., eds. Measurement and prediction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Mentzel H. A new coefficient for scalogram analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 1953: 268–280.
   Google Scholar
• Tibblin G, Tibblin B, Peciva S, Kullman S, Sva¨rdsudd K. The Go¨ teborg Quality of Life Instrument’’ — An assessment of well-being and symptoms among men born 1913 and 1923. Scand J Prim Health Care 1990; 8 (Suppl 1): 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal struc- ture of tests. Psychometrica 1951; 16: 297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE. Methodological considerations in the selec- tion of health status assessment procedures. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD, Elinson J, eds. Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: Le Jacq Publish- ing Inc., 1984; 87– 111.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers, 12th edn. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Fitspatrick R, Hopkins A. Measurement of patients’ satisfaction with their care. London: Royal College of Physicians of London, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Clark F, Azen SP, Zemke R, et al. Occupational ther- apy for independent-living older adults. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997; 278: 1321–1326.
   Google Scholar
• Helset A. Elderly woman in the Nordic countries; levels of living and situation in life. Scand J Soc Med 1993; 21: 223–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avlund K, Schultz-Larsen K. What do 70-year-old men and women do? And what are they able to do? From the Glostrup Survey in 1984. Aging Clin Exp Res 1991; 3: 39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Isacsson ÅPersson D, Scherst´en B. Occu- pation and survival: A 25-year follow-up study of anageing Swedish population. Am J Occup Ther 1997; 52: 65– 70.
   Google Scholar
• Jette A. Outcomes research: Shifting the dominant research paradigm in physical therapy. Phys Ther 1995; 75: 965–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood W. It is jump time for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther 1998; 52: 403–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northen JE, Rust DM, Nelson CE, Watts JH. In- volvement of adult rehabilitation patients in setting occupational therapy goals. Am J Occup Ther 1995; 49: 214–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Murray EA, Bundy AC, editors. Sensory integration. Theory and practise: Mind – brain– body relationships. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Uniting practise and theory in an Occupa- tional Framework. Am J Occup Ther 1998; 7: 509–521.
   Google Scholar