Assistive devices among very old people in five European countries

References

• Sonn U, Grimby G. Assistive devices in an elderly population studied at 70 and 76 years of age. Disabil Rehabil 1994; 16: 85–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonn U, Davegardh H, Lindskog AC, Steen B. The use and effectiveness of assistive devices in an elderly urban population. Aging Clin Exp Res 1996; 8: 176–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann WC, Ottenbacher KJ, Fraas L, Tomita M, Granger CV. Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly. A randomized controlled trial. Arch Fam Med 1999; 8: 210–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knops H. Shaping the future with assistive technology. Assistive technology – shaping the future, G Craddock, L McCormack, R Reilly, H Knops. ISO Press, Ohmsha 2003
   Google Scholar
• Sonn U. Att leva och bo hemma – Äldre personers erfarenheter av hjälpmedel och närmiljö. Hjälpmedelsinstitutet, Sundbyberg 2000
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Active ageing: a policy framework. [Electronic resource] 2002 [cited June 2004] [available at:, , http://www.who.int].
   Google Scholar
• Committee for Science, Technology and Industry. Health policy brief ageing and technology. [Electronic resource]. 1998, [cited June2004]. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [available at:, http://www.oecd.org/home].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Access to assistive technology: a study prepared by Deloitte & Touche. [Electronic resource] 2003 [cited September 2004]. European Commission, Social Security and Social Integration [available at:, , http://www.europa.eu.int].
   Google Scholar
• Trefler E, Hobson D. Assistive technology. Occupational therapy: enabling function and wellbeing2nd ed, C Christiansen, C Baum. Slack, Thorofare, NJ 1997
   Google Scholar
• Brandt Å. Outcomes of rollator and powered wheelchair interventions [Academic dissertation]. Lund University, Lund 2005
   Google Scholar
• Tinker A. Assistive technology and its role in housing policies for older people. Qual Ageing 2003; 2: 4–12
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Technical aids for persons with disabilities: classification and terminology. ISO Copyright Office, Geneva 2002
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain E, Evans N, Neighbour K, Hughes J. Equipment: Is it the answer? An audit of equipment provision. Br J Occup Ther 2001; 64: 595–600
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Att arbeta med äldres rehabilitering. Arbetsterapeuter och sjukgymnaster om sitt arbete med äldre. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm 2003
   Google Scholar
• Youngstrom MJ. The occupational therapy practice framework: the evolution of our professional language. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56: 609–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Samuelsson K. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices. Scand J Occup Ther 2004; 11: 143–50
   Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Iwarsson S. Satisfaction with rollators among community living users: a follow up study. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 343–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben PPJ. Changing housing for elderly people and coordination issues in Europe. Housing Studies 2001; 16: 651–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvinden B. Nordic disability policies in a changing Europe: is there still a distinct model?. Soc Policy Admin 2004; 38: 179–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman T. Defining responsibility for care: approaches to the care of older people in six European countries. Int J Soc Welfare 2000; 9: 181–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Széman Z, Harsányi L. Caught in the net in Hungary and eastern Europe. Non-profit Research Group – Institute of Sociology of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest 2000
   Google Scholar
• Lipsmeyer CC. Reading between the well-fare lines: politics and policy structure in the post-communist Europe. Europe-Asian Studies 2000; 52: 1191–1211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévai K, Straussman J. Innovative local authorities. Local Society Research Group, Budapest 1996
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson G, Iwarsson S, Ståhl A. The personal components of accessibility at group level: exploring the complexity of functional capacity. Scand J Occup Ther 2002; 9: 100–8
   Google Scholar
• Akner G. Multisjuklighet hos äldre. Analys, handläggning om äldrevårdscentral. Liber AB, Stockholm 2004
   Google Scholar
• Femia E, Zarit S, Johansson B. The disablement process in very late life: a study of the oldest-old in Sweden. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2001; 56B: 12–23
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Slaug B. Housing Enabler. An instrument for assessing and analyzing accessibility problems in housing. Studentlitteratur, Lund 2001
   Google Scholar
• Tibblin G, Bengtsson C, Furunes B, Lapidus L. Symptoms by age and sex. Scand J Prim Health Care 1990; 8: 9–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards NI, Jones DA. Ownership and use of assistive devices amongst older people in the community. Age Ageing 1998; 27: 463–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker J, Rijken M, van Poppel M, de Bruin A. The possession of technical aids among persons with a somatic chronic disease. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 393–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartke RJ, Prohaska TR, Furner SE. Older adults and assistive devices: use, multiple-device use, and need. J Ageing Health 1998; 10: 99–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin LN, Schemm RL, Landsberg L, Burgh D. Factors predicting assistive device use in the home by older people following rehabilitation. J Ageing Health 1996; 8: 554–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjälpmedelsinstitutet. Äldrestatistik. Äldres hälsa, funktionshinder, boende och hjälpmedel. Report No: 03324. Hjälpmedelsinstitutet, Vällingby 2003
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin-Ivanoff, S, Sonn, U. Use of assistive devices in daily activities among 85-year-olds living at home focusing especially on the visually impaired. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1423–30, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings-Krakowsky L, Finlayson M. Factors affecting older adults' use of adaptive equipment: review of the literature. Am J Occup Ther 2001; 55: 303–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finlayson M, Guglielmello L, Liefer K. Describing and predicting the possession of assistive devices among persons with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther 2001; 55: 545–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosman-Hedström G, Claesson L, Blomstrand C. Assistive devices in elderly population after stroke: a longitudinal, randomized study—Göteborg 70+ Stroke Study. Scand J Occup Ther 2002; 9: 109–18
   Google Scholar
• Kling C, Persson A, Gardulf A. The ADL ability and use of technical aids in person with late effect of polio. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56: 457–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorén-Jönsson A-L. Coming to terms with the shift in one's capability: a study of adaptive process in person with poliomyelitis sequel. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23: 341–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Klerk M, Huijsman R, Mc Donell J. The use of technical aids by elderly persons in the Netherlands: an application of the Andersen and Newman model. Gerontologist 1997; 37: 365–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Sonn U. Assistive devices in activities of daily living used by persons with age-related macular degeneration: a population study of 85-year-olds living at home. Scand J Occup Ther 2004; 11: 1–8
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Sixsmith J, Oswald F, . The ENABLE-AGE Project: Multi-dimensional methodology for European housing research. Housing research methodologies, N Wilkinson, Y Hurol, et al. Urban International Press, Turkey 2004
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Wahl H-W, Nygren C. Challenges of cross-national housing research with older persons: lessons from the ENABLE-AGE project. Eur J Ageing 2004; 1: 79–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Whelan, C, Fahey, T, Maitre, B. Economic exclusion, social exclusion and social integration in an enlarged European Union. Paper presented at the Changequal Network Workshop. 2004, 24–25, November, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Cook H, Hussey S. Asssistive Technologies: principles and practice. Mosby, St Louis, MO 2002
   Google Scholar
• McCreadie C, Tinker A. The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing Soc 2005; 25: 91–110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelands M, Van Oost P, Buysse A, Depoorter A. Awareness among community-dwelling elderly of assistive devices for mobility and self-care and attitudes towards their use. Soc Sci Med 2002; 54: 1441–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates PS, Spencer JC, Young ME, Rintala D. Assistive technology and the newly disabled adult: Adaptation to wheelchair use. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 1014–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson-Lund M, Nygård L. Incorporating or resisting assistive devices: different approaches to achieving a desired occupational self-image. Occup Ther J Res 2003; 23: 67–75
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Nygren C, Slaug B. Cross-national and multi-professional interrater reliability of the Housing Enabler. Scand J Occup Ther 2005; 12: 29–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar