Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: Basic assumptions in focus-group methodology

References

• Kreuger R. The future of focus groups. Qual Health Res 1995; 5: 516–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson C-G. Focus groups and others methods for increased effectiveness of community intervention – a review. Scand J Prim Health Care 1988; 1: 73–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan DL. Future directions for focus groups. Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art, DL Morgan. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1993; 225–44
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1988
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. Br Med J 1995; 311: 299–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illness 1994; 16: 103–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DL, Krueger RA. When to use focus groups and why. Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art, DL Morgan. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1993; 3–19
   Google Scholar
• Litosseliti L. Using focus groups in research. Continuum, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Fuller TD, Edwards JN, Vorakifphokatorn S, Sermani S. Using focus groups to adapt survey instrument to new populations. Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art, DL Morgan. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1993; 89–104
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin Ivanoff S. Focus group discussions as a tool for developing a health education programme for elderly persons with visual impairment. Scand J Occup Ther 2002; 9: 3–9
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin Ivanoff S, Sjöstrand J, Klepp KI, Axelsson Lind L, Lundgren-Lindqvist B. Planning a health education programme for the elderly visually impaired person – a focus group study. Disabil Rehabil 1996; 18: 515–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin Ivanoff S, Klepp KI, Sjöstrand J. Development of a health education programme for persons with age-related macular degeneration. Patient Educ Couns 1998; 34: 63–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin Ivanoff S, Sonn U, Svensson E. Development of an ADL instrument targeting elderly with age-related macular degeneration. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23: 69–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren K, Dahlin Ivanoff S. Women on sickness absence – Views of possibilities and obstacles for returning to work: A focus group study. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 213–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Quality control in focus group research. Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art, DL Morgan. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1993; 65–85
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin Ivanoff S, Sonn U, Svensson E. A health education program for elderly with visual impairment and perceived security in the performance of daily occupations: a randomized study. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56: 148–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins H. Changing order – replication and induction in scientific practice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1985
   Google Scholar
• Latour B, Woolgar S, Laboratory Life. The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor D. Sociology of scientific knowledge. Handbook of epistemology, I. Niiniluoto, et al. Kluwer, Dordrecht 2004; 919–62
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Törnebohm H. Tre Essäer i Vetenskapsteori [Three Essays in Theory of Science]. Report No. 192. Gothenburg: Department of Theory of Science, Gothenburg University; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Törnebohm H. Paradigmatik [Paradigmatics]. Ms, Department of Theory of Science, Gothenburg University; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Törnebohm H. Forskning och yrken [Research and Professions]. Report No. 187. Department of Theory of Science, Gothenburg University; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob M, Hellström T. From Networking researchers to the networked university. The future of knowledge production in the academy, M Jacob, T Hellström. Open University Press, Buckingham 2000; 81–94
   Google Scholar
• Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. Focus groups: Theory and practice. Sage Publications, London 1990
   Google Scholar
• Asbury J. Overview of focus group research. Qual Health Res 1995; 5: 516–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkingson S. Focus group research. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, D Silverman. Sage Publications, London 2004; 177–99
   Google Scholar
• Barbour R, Kitzinger J. Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, R Barbour, J Kitzinger. Sage Publications, London 1999
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs A. Focus groups: Social research update. Issue 19. Guildford Department of SociologyUniversity of Surrey. Available at: http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU19html.
   Google Scholar
• L, Windahl S. Focus groups: Some suggestions. Scand J Prim Health Care 1988; 1(Suppl)91–5
   Google Scholar
• Madriz E. Focus groups in feminist research. Handbook of qualitative research2nd ed, NK Denzin, YS Lincoln. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2000; 835–50
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. Why things (sometimes) go wrong in focus groups. Qual Health Res 1995; 5: 516–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basch CE. Focus group interview: An under utilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Educ Q 1987; 14: 411–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramirez A, Sheppard J. The use of focus groups in health research. Scand J Prim Health Care 1987; Suppl: 81–90
   Google Scholar
• Folch-Lyon E, Trost JF. Conducting focus group sessions. Stud Fam Plann 1981; 12: 443–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkingson S. How useful are focus groups in feminist research?. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, R Barbour, J Kitzinger. Sage Publications, London 1999
   Google Scholar
• Barbour RS. Using focus groups in general practice research. Fam Pract 1995; 12: 328–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour RS. Making sense of focus groups. Med Educ 2005; 39: 1–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin NK, Lincoln Y. Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research2nd ed, NK Denzin, YS Lincoln. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2000; 1–28
   Google Scholar
• Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage Publications; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne DE. Narrative configuration in qualitative analyses. Qual Stud Educ 1995; 8: 5–22
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi A. Phenomenology and psychological research. Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA 1985
   Google Scholar
• Larsson S. Om kvalitet i kvalitativa studier. Nordisk Pedagogik 1993; 4: 194–211
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt TA. Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructivism. Handbook of qualitative research2nd ed, NK Denzin, YS Lincoln. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2000; 189–205
   Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ, Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative methods: The search for meaning. Wiley, New York 1984
   Google Scholar