Performance of activities of daily living in a sample of applicants for home modification services

References

• Gitlin LN, Mann W, Tomit M, Marcus SM. Factors associated with home environmental problems among community-living older people. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23: 777–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S. A long-term perspective on person–environment fit and ADL dependence among older Swedish adults. Gerontologist 2005; 45: 327–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Policy for the elderly. Fact sheet No. 14. Author; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Äldrecentrum. Äldres hälsa och välbefinnande. En utmaning för folkhälsoarbetet, [Health and well-being among older people. A challenge for public health] (in Swedish). Jönköping: Stiftelsen Stockholms läns Äldrecentrum; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Lag om Bostadsanpassning, [The Home Modification legislation] (in Swedish). SFS 1992:1574. Stockholm: Swedish government; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Housing. Bostadsanpassningsbidragen 2004 [Home modification grants in 2004], (in Swedish). Karlskrona: Boverket; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mann WC, Ottenbacher KJ, Fraas L, et al. Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Fam Med 1999; 8: 210–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gitlin LN, Corcoran M, Winter L, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of a home environmental intervention: Effect on efficacy and upset in caregivers and on daily function of persons with dementia. Gerontologist 2001; 41: 4–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood F. The health outcomes of housing adaptations. Disability and Society 2004; 19: 129–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood F. Understanding needs: A starting point for quality. Housing Studies 2004; 19: 709–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosman-Hedstrom G, Claesson L, Blomstrand C. Assistive devices in elderly people after stroke: a longitudinal randomized study – The Göteborg 70+ Stroke Study. Scand J Occup Ther 2002; 9: 109–18
   Google Scholar
• Fänge A, Iwarsson S. Changes in ADL dependence and aspects of usability following housing adaptation: A longitudinal perspective. Am J Occup Ther 2005; 59: 296–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark S. Removing Environmental barriers in the homes of older adults with disabilities improves occupational performance. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health 2004; 24: 32–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin LN. Conducting research on home environments: Lessons learned and new directions. Gerontologist 2003; 43: 628–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fänge A, Iwarsson S. Changes in accessibility and usability in housing: an exploration of the housing adaptation process. Occup Ther Int 2005; 12: 44–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorslund, M, Lundgren, K, Elofsson, S, et al. Äldre som flyttar till service och vård. Uppföljning av situationen i Sundsvall, (Elderly who move to service and care. Follow-up of the situation in Sundsvall):, Socialstyrelsen; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• OT Australia. Code of Ethics: Australian Association of Occupational Therapists. Available at:, , http://www.ausot.com.au/Documents/CodeEthics090801.pdf (2005).
   Google Scholar
• FSA. Etisk kod [Code of Ethics] (in Swedish). Föreningen sveriges arbetsterapeuter; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• The national board of health and wellfare. Informationsöverföring. SOSFS 1996:32, [Transmitting information] (in Swedish). Author; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Enabling Occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. 2nd ed. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• The national board of health and wellfare. Äldres rehabiliteringsbehov i hemmiljö (The need for rehabilitation for older people in their home environment). Stockholm: The national board of health and welfare; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jagger C, Arthur AJ, Spiers NA, Clarke M. Patterns of onset of disability in activities of daily living with age. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 404–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol, M, De Jong, BA, Ward, CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:970–4; discussion 5–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell BR, Sanford JA. Difficulty, dependence and housing accessibility for people aging with a disability. J Architectural and Planning Res 2001; 18: 234–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill TM, Robison JT, Tinetti ME. Difficulty and dependence: Two components of the disability continuum among community-living older persons. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 96–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM. How measurement techniques influence estimates of disability in older populations. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 937–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini–mental state": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radloff LS. The CESD scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1977; 1: 385–401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillenbaum GG. Mutidimensional functional assessment of older adults: The Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1988
   Google Scholar
• UDSMR. A Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation, (Adult FIM), Version 4.0. Buffalo, NY: SUNY-Buffalo UDSMR; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, et al. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 127–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, et al. The Functional Independence Measure: A comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 10–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med 1994; 26: 115–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1226–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin LN, Corcoran M. Client–Clinician Assessment Protocol (C–CAP). Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 2000
   Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Erlbaum, London 2001
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, I, Fisher, A, Hemmingsson, H, Lilja, M. The Client–Clinician Assessment Protocol: A first evaluation of its psychometric properties for use with older adults with functional limitations. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health. Accepted for publication..
   Google Scholar
• Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London 1999
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. SPSS 13.0 for Windows. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson I, Berndtsson I, Appelros P, Ahlstrom G. Lifeworld perspectives on assistive devices: Lived experiences of spouses of persons with stroke. Scand J Occup Ther 2005; 12: 159–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen SM, Foster A, Berg K. Receiving help at home: The interplay of human and technological assistance. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2001; 56: S374–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agree EM, Freedman VA. Incorporating assistive devices into community-based long-term care: An analysis of the potential for substitution and supplementation. J Aging Health 2000; 12: 426–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The national board of health and wellfare. Äldres levnadsförhållanden 1988–2002. Hälsa, funktionsförmåga och vård- och omsorgsmönster [The living situation of older people 1988–2002. Health, functional ability and patterns of care] (in Swedish). Socialstyrelsen; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lilja M. Elderly disabled persons in the home setting: Aspects of activities in daily life. Department of clinical neuroscience, occupational therapy and elderly care research, Division of occupational therapy. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 2000
   Google Scholar
• McCreadie C, Tinker A. The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing and Society 2005; 25: 91–110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A. Changing geographies of care: Employing the concept of therapeutic landscapes as a framework in examining home space. Soc Sci Med 2002; 55: 141–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thille A, Wramner B. Liv till åren-om hälsofrämjande och sjukdomsförebyggande insatser för äldre [Adding life to ages – about health promoting and disease preventing interventions for older people] (in Swedish). Svenska Kommunförbundet och Folkhälsoinstitutet, Stockholm 1999
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Isacsson A. Housing standards, environmental barriers in the home and subjective general apprehension of housing situation among the rural elderly. Scand J Occup Ther 1996; 3: 52–61
   Google Scholar
• Agree EM, Freedman VA. A comparison of assistive technology and personal care in alleviating disability and unmet need. Gerontologist 2003; 43: 335–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar