916
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Artificial intelligence enabled participatory planning: a review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 183-210 | Received 19 Jan 2023, Accepted 18 Sep 2023, Published online: 04 Oct 2023

References

  • Abbot, J., & Marohasy, J. (2013). The potential benefits of using artificial intelligence for monthly rainfall forecasting for the Bowen Basin, Queensland, Australia. Water Resources Management VII, 171, 287.
  • Afzalan, N., Sanchez, T. W., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2017). Creating smarter cities: Considerations for selecting online participatory tools. Cities, 67, 21–30.
  • Aguirre, R., & Nyerges, T. (2014). An agent-based model of public participation in sustainability management. In JASSS-The Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (Vol. 17, Issue 1). J A S S S. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2297
  • Ai, F., Comfort, L., Dong, Y., & Znati, T. (2016). A dynamic decision support system based on geographical information and mobile social networks: A model for tsunami risk mitigation in Padang, Indonesia. Safety Science, 90, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.022
  • Allam, Z., & Dhunny, Z. (2019). On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities, 89, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032
  • An, L., Grimm, V., Bai, Y., Sullivan, A., Turner, B. L., II, Malleson, N., … Tang, W. (2023). Modeling agent decision and behavior in the light of data science and artificial intelligence. Environmental Modelling & Software, 166, 105713.
  • Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of community participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224.
  • Auerbach, J., Blackburn, C., Barton, H., Meng, A., & Zegura, E. (2020). Coupling data science with community crowdsourcing for urban renewal policy analysis: An evaluation of Atlanta’s Anti-Displacement Tax Fund. Environment And Planning B-Urban Analytics And City Science, 47(6), 1081–1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318819847
  • Austin, M., Delgoshaei, P., Coelho, M., & Heidarinejad, M. (2020). Architecting smart city digital twins: Combined semantic model and machine learning approach. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000774
  • Bakht, M., El-Diraby, T., & Hossaini, M. (2018). Game-based crowdsourcing to support collaborative customization of the definition of sustainability. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 38, 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.08.019
  • Barbosa, A., Martin, B., Hermoso, V., Arevalo-Torres, J., Barbiere, J., Martinez-Lopez, J., … Iglesias-Campos, A. (2019). Cost-effective restoration and conservation planning in green and blue infrastructure designs. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 1463–1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.416.
  • Berke, P., Smith, G., & Lyles, W. (2012). Planning for resiliency: Evaluation of state hazard mitigation plans under the disaster mitigation act. Natural Hazards Review, 13(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000063
  • Berke, P. R., & French, S. P. (1994). The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13(4), 237–250.
  • Biljecki, F., & Ito, K. (2021). Street view imagery in urban analytics and GIS: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 215, 104217.
  • Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., … Askell, A. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2005.14165. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165
  • Cai, L., Fan, L., Lai, W., Long, Y., Wang, P., & Xin, X. (2018). Definition, application and influence of artificial intelligence on design industries. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 6(2), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-20180207
  • Dehaene, S. (2020). How we learn: The new science of education and the brain. London: Penguin.
  • Do, E., & Gross, M. (2001). Thinking with diagrams in architectural design. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006661524497
  • Dong, L., Ratti, C., & Zheng, S. (2019). Predicting neighborhoods’ socioeconomic attributes using restaurant data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(31), 15447–15452. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903064116
  • Du, J., Wang, S., Ye, X., Sinton, D. S., & Kemp, K. (2021). GIS-KG: Building a large-scale hierarchical knowledge graph for geographic information science. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 36, 873–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2021.2005795
  • Du, J., Zhang, F., Du, Z., & Liu, R. (2020). Assessing vulnerability of road networks based on traffic flow betweenness centrality: A case study in Wuxi. Journal of Zhejiang University, Science Edition, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2020.02.013
  • Dwivedi, Y., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., … Williams, M. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
  • Elizalde-Ramirez, F., Nigenda, R., Martinez-Salazar, I., & Rios-Solis, Y. (2019). Travel plans in public transit networks using artificial intelligence planning models. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 33(5), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2019.1582859
  • Escobedo, F., Bottin, M., Cala, D., & Montoya, D. (2020). Spatial literacy influences stakeholder’s recognition and mapping of peri-urban and urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosystems, 23(5), 1039–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00962-y
  • Fagerholm, N., Raymond, C. M., Olafsson, A. S., Brown, G., Rinne, T., Hasanzadeh, K., … Kyttä, M. (2021). A methodological framework for analysis of participatory mapping data in research, planning, and management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 35(9), 1848–1875. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1869747
  • Falco, G. (2019). Participatory AI: Reducing AI bias and developing socially responsible AI in smart cities. 2019 22nd IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (IEEE CSE 2019) and 17th IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (IEEE EUC 2019) (WOS:000521797300030; pp. 160–164). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSE/EUC.2019.00038
  • Frazier, A. E., Wikle, T., & Kedron, P. (2018). Exploring the anatomy of Geographic Information Systems and Technology (GIS&T) textbooks. Transactions in GIS, 22(1), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12301
  • Gillath, O., Ai, T., Branicky, M. S., Keshmiri, S., Davison, R. B., & Spaulding, R. (2021). Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106607
  • Girbes-Peco, S., Renta-Davids, A., De Botton, L., & Alvarez-Cifuentes, P. (2020). The Montserrat’s neighbourhood dream: Involving Moroccan residents in a school-based community development process in urban Spain. Social & Cultural Geography, 21(5), 674–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2018.1509112
  • Goodchild, M. F. (2010). Towards geodesign: Repurposing cartography and GIS? Cartographic Perspectives, 66, 7–22.
  • Gorsevski, P. V., Cathcart, S. C., Mirzaei, G., Jamali, M. M., Ye, X., & Gomezdelcampo, E. (2013). A group-based spatial decision support system for wind farm site selection in Northwest Ohio. Energy Policy, 55, 374–385.
  • Haqbeen, J., Sahab, S., Ito, T., & Rizzi, P. (2021). Using decision support system to enable crowd identify neighborhood issues and Its solutions for policy makers: An online experiment at Kabul municipal level. Sustainability, 13(10), 5453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105453
  • Heikkila, E. J., & Blewett, E. J. (1992). Using expert systems to check compliance with municipal building codes. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(1), 72–80.
  • Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
  • Hollander, J. B., Potts, R., Hartt, M., & Situ, M. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in community planning. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 3(4), 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00090-7
  • Hu, Q., Tang, Z., Zhang, L., Xu, Y., Wu, X., & Zhang, L. (2018). Evaluating climate change adaptation efforts on the US 50 states’ hazard mitigation plans. Natural Hazards, 92(2), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3225-z
  • Hu, Y., Deng, C., & Zhou, Z. (2019). A semantic and sentiment analysis on online neighborhood reviews for understanding the perceptions of people toward their living environments. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(4), 1052–1073.
  • IAP2. (2023). International association for public participation statement on diversity, equity and inclusion. Retrieved April 9, 2023, from https://www.iap2.org/page/IAP2-DEI-English.
  • Ibrahim, K., Khodursky, S., & Yasseri, T. (2021). Gender imbalance and spatiotemporal patterns of contributions to citizen science projects: The case of Zooniverse. Frontiers in Physics, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.650720
  • Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2018). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Jankovic, M., & Zarate, P. (2011). Discrepancies and analogies in artificial intelligence and engineering design approaches in addressing collaborative decision-making. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdsst.2011040101
  • Jankowski, P., Forss, K., Czepkiewicz, M., Saarikoski, H., & Kahila, M. (2021). Assessing impacts of PPGIS on urban land use planning: Evidence from Finland and Poland. European Planning Studies, 30(8), 1529–1548.
  • Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. (2001). GIS for group decision making. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Jelokhani-Niaraki, M. (2021). Collaborative spatial multicriteria evaluation: A review and directions for future research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 35(1), 9–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1776870
  • Kaklauskas, A., Bardauskiene, D., Cerkauskiene, R., Ubarte, I., Raslanas, S., Radvile, E., … Kaklauskiene, L. (2021). Emotions analysis in public spaces for urban planning. Land Use Policy, 107, 105458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105458
  • Kaklauskas, A., Jokubauskas, D., Cerkauskas, J., Dzemyda, G., Ubarte, I., Skirmantas, D., … Simkute, I. (2019). Affective analytics of demonstration sites. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 81, 346–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.03.001
  • Kerebel, A., Gelinas, N., Dery, S., Voigt, B., & Munson, A. (2019). Landscape aesthetic modelling using Bayesian networks: Conceptual framework and participatory indicator weighting. Landscape and Urban Planning, 185, 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.001
  • Kontokosta, C. E. (2018). Urban informatics in the science and practice of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18793716
  • Kumar, S., Bhaumik, S., & Banerji, H. (2021). Methodology for framing indicators for assessing economic-socio-cultural sustainability of the neighbourhood level urban communities in Indian megacities: Evidence from Kolkata. Social Indicators Research, 154(2), 511–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02559-6
  • Li, C., Xia, W., & Chai, Y. (2021). Delineation of an urban community life circle based on a machine-learning estimation of spatiotemporal behavioral demand. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1174-z
  • Li, W. (2018). Lowering the barriers for accessing distributed geospatial big data to advance spatial data science: The PolarHub solution. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(3), 773–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1373625
  • Lieberknecht, K. (2021). Community-centered climate planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 88(0), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2021.1896974
  • Lim-Wavde, K., Kauffman, R., & Dawson, G. (2017). Household informedness and policy analytics for the collection and recycling of household hazardous waste in California. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.007
  • Liu, F., Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Chen, S., Janssens, D., Wets, G., & Theodoridis, Y. (2020). Citywide traffic analysis based on the combination of visual and analytic approaches. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 4(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-020-00057-4
  • Liu, Q., Wang, K., Li, Y., & Liu, Y. (2020). Data-driven concept network for inspiring designers’ idea generation. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046207
  • Lock, O., Bain, M., & Pettit, C. (2021). Towards the collaborative development of machine learning techniques in planning support systems – a Sydney example. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(3), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320939974
  • Lock, O., & Pettit, C. (2020). Social media as passive geo-participation in transportation planning—How effective are topic modeling and sentiment analysis in comparison with citizen surveys?. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 23(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2020.1815596
  • Long, Y., Zhai, W., Shen, Y., & Ye, X. (2018). Understanding uneven urban expansion with natural cities using open data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177, 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.008
  • Mai, G., Janowicz, K., Cai, L., Zhu, R., Regalia, B., Yan, B., … Lao, N. (2020). SE-KGE: A location-aware knowledge graph embedding model for geographic question answering and spatial semantic lifting. Transactions in GIS, 24(3), 623–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12629
  • Mai, G., Janowicz, K., Yan, B., Zhu, R., Cai, L., & Lao, N. (2020). Multi-scale representation learning for spatial feature distributions using grid cells. International conference on learning representations. Retrieved from https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJljdh4KDH
  • Malczewski, J., & Jankowski, P. (2020). Emerging trends and research frontiers in spatial multicriteria analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34(7), 1257–1282.
  • Martinez-Lopez, J., Teixeira, H., Morgado, M., Almagro, M., Sousa, A., Villa, F., … Lillebo, A. (2019). Participatory coastal management through elicitation of ecosystem service preferences and modelling driven by “coastal squeeze”. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 1113–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.309
  • Meerow, S., & Woodruff, S. C. (2020). Seven principles of strong climate change planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 86(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1652108
  • Miranda, A., Relvas, H., Viaene, P., Janssen, S., Brasseur, O., Carnevale, C., … Volta, M. (2016). Applying integrated assessment methodologies to air quality plans: Two European cases. Environmental Science & Policy, 65, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.010
  • Molina, M. (2005). An intelligent assistant for public transport management. Advances in Intelligent Computing, PT 2, Proceedings (WOS:000232529000021; Vol. 3645, pp. 199–208).
  • Nijkamp, P., van der Burch, M., & Vindigni, G. (2002). A comparative institutional evaluation of public-private partnerships in Dutch urban land-use and revitalisation projects. Urban Studies, 39(10), 1865–1880. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098022000002993
  • Nousdilis, A. I., Kryonidis, G. C., Kontis, E. O., Barzegkar-Ntovom, G. A., Panapakidis, I. P., Christoforidis, G. C., & Papagiannis, G. K. (2020). Impact of policy incentives on the promotion of integrated PV and battery storage systems: A techno-economic assessment. IET Renewable Power Generation, 14(7), 1174–1183.
  • OECD. (2021). OECD report on public communication. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/22f8031c-en
  • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Whiting, P. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 1–1.
  • Pournaras, E. (2020). Proof of witness presence: Blockchain consensus for augmented democracy in smart cities. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 145, 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2020.06.015
  • Quan, S., Park, J., Economou, A., & Lee, S. (2019). Artificial intelligence-aided design: Smart design for sustainable city development. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(8), 1581–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319867946
  • Rivet, A., & Krajcik, J. (2004). Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project-based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 669–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20021
  • Rodriguez-Soto, C., Velazquez, A., Monroy-Vilchis, O., Lemes, P., & Loyola, R. (2017). Joint ecological, geographical and cultural approach to identify territories of opportunity for large vertebrates conservation in Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(8), 1899–1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1335-7
  • Rosen, J., & Painter, G. (2019). From citizen control to co-production: Moving beyond a linear conception of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(3), 335–347.
  • Sanchez, T. W., Shumway, H., Gordner, T., & Lim, T. (2022). The prospects of artificial intelligence in urban planning. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 2, 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2102538
  • Schläpfer, M., Dong, L., O’Keeffe, K., Santi, P., Szell, M., Salat, H., … West, G. B. (2021). The universal visitation law of human mobility. Nature, 593(7860), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03480-9
  • Schölkopf, B., Locatello, F., Bauer, S., Ke, N. R., Kalchbrenner, N., Goyal, A., & Bengio, Y. (2021). Towards causal representation learning. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2102.11107.
  • Sharma, A., Hamlet, A., Fernando, H., Catlett, C., Horton, D., Kotamarthi, V., … Wuebbles, D. (2018). The need for an integrated land-lake-atmosphere modeling system. Great Lakes Region. Earths Future, 6(10), 1366–1379. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000870
  • Shin, J., Rajabifard, A., Kalantari, M., & Atazadeh, B. (2021). Impact of ownership and architectural design on property disputes in multi-owned buildings. HABITAT International, 112, 102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102371
  • Shin, T., Yuan, Z., Siong, N., Zhang, Y., & Phang, V. (2017). Towards a deep learning powered query engine for urban planning. 2017 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP) (WOS:000428370700024; pp. 99–102).
  • Shuler, C., Brewington, L., & El-Kadi, A. (2021). A participatory approach to assessing groundwater recharge under future climate and land-cover scenarios. Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies, 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100785
  • Sirbu, A., Becker, M., Caminiti, S., De Baets, B., Elen, B., Francis, L., … Van den Bossche, J. (2015). Participatory patterns in an international air quality monitoring initiative. PLOS ONE, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136763
  • Slack, D., Hilgard, S., Jia, E., Singh, S., & Lakkaraju, H. (2019). How can we fool LIME and SHAP? Adversarial attacks on post hoc explanation methods. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02508
  • Stamatiadou, M., Thoidis, I., Vryzas, N., Vrysis, L., & Dimoulas, C. (2021). Semantic crowdsourcing of soundscapes heritage: A mojo model for data-driven storytelling. Sustainability, 13(5), 2714. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052714
  • Tian, Z., Zhong, R., Barenji, A., Wang, Y., Li, Z., & Rong, Y. (2021). A blockchain-based evaluation approach for customer delivery satisfaction in sustainable urban logistics. International Journal of Production Research, 59(7), 2229–2249.https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1809733
  • Tomašev, N., Cornebise, J., Hutter, F., Mohamed, S., Picciariello, A., Connelly, B., … Clopath, C. (2020). AI for social good: Unlocking the opportunity for positive impact. Nature Communications, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15871-z
  • United Nations. (n.d.). Goal 11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11
  • van den Homberg, M., Gevaert, C., & Georgiadou, Y. (2020). The changing face of accountability in humanitarianism: Using artificial intelligence for anticipatory action. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 456–467. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3158
  • Walisadeera, A., Ginige, A., & Wikramanayake, G. (2015). User centered ontology for Sri Lankan farmers. Ecological Informatics, 26, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.07.008
  • Walter, A., & Scholz, R. (2007). Critical success conditions of collaborative methods: A comparative evaluation of transport planning projects. Transportation, 34(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-006-9000-0
  • Wang, Z., & Ye, X. (2018). Social media analytics for natural disaster management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2017.1367003
  • Wiggins, L. L., & Ferreira, J. (1992). MIT’s computer resource lab. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 6(4), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799208901914
  • Wilson, J. P., Butler, K., Gao, S., Hu, Y., Li, W., & Wright, D. J. (2021). A five-star guide for achieving replicability and reproducibility when working with GIS software and algorithms. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(5), 1311–1317. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1806026
  • Yang, Y., Bai, Y., Wang, X., Wang, L., Jin, X., & Sun, Q. (2020). Group decision-making support for sustainable governance of algal bloom in urban lakes. Sustainability, 12(4), 1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041494
  • Yasumoto, S., Jones, A., Yano, K., & Nakaya, T. (2012). Virtual city models for assessing environmental equity of access to sunlight: A case study of Kyoto, Japan. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(1), 1–13.
  • Ye, X., Du, J., & Ye, Y. (2021). MasterplanGAN: Facilitating the smart rendering of urban master plans via generative adversarial networks. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211023516
  • Ye, X., Wu, L., Lemke, M., Valera, P., & Sackey, J. (2022). Defining computational urban science. In Bin Li (Ed.), New thinking in GIScience (pp. 293–300). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  • Yu, K., Zhang, Y., Li, D., Montenegro-Marin, C., & Kumar, P. (2021). Environmental planning based on reduce, reuse, recycle and recover using artificial intelligence. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2020.106492
  • Yu, P., Williams, B., Fang, C., Cui, J., & Haslum, P. (2017). Resolving over-constrained temporal problems with uncertainty through conflict-directed relaxation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 60, 425–490 https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.5431.
  • Zhang, F., Wu, L., Zhu, D., & Liu, Y. (2019). Social sensing from street-level imagery: A case study in learning spatio-temporal urban mobility patterns. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 153, 48–58.
  • Zhang, Y., Grignard, A., Lyons, K., Aubuchon, A., & Larson, K. (2018). Real-time machine learning prediction of an agent-based model for urban decision-making. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’ 18) (WOS:000468231300357; p. 2173).
  • Zhao, X., Ma, X., Tang, W., & Liu, D. (2019). An adaptive agent-based optimization model for spatial planning: A case study of Anyue County. China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101733
  • Zhu, D., Zhang, F., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Cheng, X., Huang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2020). Understanding place characteristics in geographic contexts through graph convolutional neural networks. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(2), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1694403

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.