Peer effects of income in consumption

References

• Abel, A. B. (2005). Optimal taxation when consumers have endogenous benchmark levels of consumption. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005). How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 56(3), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2002.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Cuadrado, F., Casado, J. M., & Labeaga, J. M. (2016). Envy and habits: Panel data estimates of interdependent preferences. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 443–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Cuadrado, F., & Van Long, N. (2011). The relative income hypothesis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35(9), 1489–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2011.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J., & Dasgupta, P. S. (2009). Conspicuous consumption, inconspicuous leisure. The Economic Journal, 119(541), F497–F516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., & Kingdon, G. G. (2008). Gender and household education expenditure in Pakistan. Applied Economics, 40(20), 2573–2591. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600970252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beugnot, J., Fortin, B., Lacroix, G., & Villeval, M. C. (2019). Gender and peer effects on performance in social networks. European Economic Review, 113, 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani, S., & Sharma, S. (2000). Herd behavior in financial markets. IMF Staff Papers, 47, 279–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/3867650
   Google Scholar
• Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7-8), 1359–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B. (2009). Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of Econometrics, 150(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B. (2020). Peer effects in networks: A survey. Annual Review of Economics, 12(1), 603–629. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-020320-033926
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, J., Krimmel, J., & Ramcharan, R. (2021). Signaling status: The impact of relative income on household consumption and financial decisions. Management Science, 67(4), 1993–2009. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvó-Armengol, A., Patacchini, E., & Zenou, Y. (2009). Peer effects and social networks in education. Review of Economic Studies, 76(4), 1239–1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00550.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, A., & Deaton, A. (2003). Consumption, health, gender, and poverty. World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Case, A. C., & Katz, L. F. (1991). The company you keep: The effects of family and neighborhood on disadvantaged youths [Working Paper 3705]. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3705
   Google Scholar
• Charles, K. K., Hurst, E., & Roussanov, N. (2009). Conspicuous consumption and race. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 425–467. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers, T. L., & Rao, A. R. (1992). The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1086/209296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. E., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M. C. (2010). Effort and comparison income: Experimental and survey evidence. ILR Review, 63(3), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391006300303
   Google Scholar
• De Giorgi, G., Frederiksen, A., & Pistaferri, L. (2020). Consumption network effects. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(1), 130–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Giorgi, G., Pellizzari, M., & Redaelli, S. (2010). Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), 241–275. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.2.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgarakos, D., Haliassos, M., & Pasini, G. (2014). Household debt and social interactions. Review of Financial Studies, 27(5), 1404–1433. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorbachev, O. (2011). Did household consumption become more volatile? American Economic Review, 101(5), 2248–2270. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.2248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinblatt, M., Keloharju, M., & Ikäheimo, S. (2008). Social influence and consumption: Evidence from the automobile purchases of neighbors. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.90.4.735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, M. B. (2018). Consumption with liquidity constraints: An analytical characterization. Economics Letters, 167, 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. O. (2014). Networks in the understanding of economic behaviors. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijonhufvud, A. (1967). Keynes and the Keynesians: A suggested interpretation. The American Economic Review, 57, 401–410. https://doi.org/10.2307/1821641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Zang, W., & An, L. (2013). Peer effects and school dropout in rural China. China Economic Review, 27, 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, C., Zhang, A., & Zhen, X. (2018). Peer effects in consumption among Chinese rural households. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(10), 2333–2347. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2017.1363034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, A. G., Yin, Z., Yue, P., & Zhou, H. (2021). Does financial literacy alleviate risk attitude and risk behavior inconsistency? International Review of Economics & Finance, 74, 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. D., & Sullivan, J. X. (2013). Consumption and income inequality and the great recession. American Economic Review, 103(3), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. (2011). Social learning and peer effects in consumption: Evidence from movie sales. The Review of Economic Studies, 78(1), 356–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdq014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumark, D., & Postlewaite, A. (1998). Relative income concerns and the rise in married women’s employment. Journal of Public Economics, 70(1), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00065-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoletti, C., Salvanes, K. G., & Tominey, E. (2018). The family peer effect on mothers’ labor supply. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(3), 206–234. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palley, T. I. (2010). The relative permanent income theory of consumption: A synthetic Keynes–Duesenberry–Friedman model. Review of Political Economy, 22(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538250903391954
   Google Scholar
• Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2002). Self-rated economic welfare in Russia. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1453–1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00151-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roychowdhury, P. (2019). Peer effects in consumption in India: An instrumental variables approach using negative idiosyncratic shocks. World Development, 114, 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). Uncertainty, secrecy, and the choice of similar others. Social Psychology, 41(3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalembier, B., Bleys, B., Van Ootegem, L., & Verhofstadt, E. (2019). How relative income affects work hours preferences. Applied Economics, 51(51), 5545–5558. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1613512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sseruyange, J., & Bulte, E. (2020). Wage differentials and workers’ effort: Experimental evidence from Uganda. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), 647–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, W., & Wang, X. (2013). Do relative income and income inequality affect consumption? Evidence from the villages of rural China. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(4), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.740017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (2017). The social psychology of groups. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315135007
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Mirza, N., Vasbieva, D. G., Abbas, Q., & Xiong, D. (2020). The nexus of carbon emissions, financial development, renewable energy consumption, and technological innovation: What should be the priorities in light of COP 21 agreements? Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women’s luxury products as signals to other women. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 834–854. https://doi.org/10.1086/673256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, X., & Yue, P. (2023). Financial literacy and household energy efficiency: An analysis of credit market and supply chain. Finance Research Letters, 52, 103563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103563
   Google Scholar
• Yue, P., Korkmaz, A. G., Yin, Z., & Zhou, H. (2021). Liquidity constraints and family labor participation. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2020.1864102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, P., Korkmaz, A. G., & Zhou, H. (2020). Household financial decision making amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(10), 2363–2377. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2020.1784717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, P., Korkmaz, A. G., Yin, Z., & Zhou, H. (2022). The rise of digital finance: Financial inclusion or debt trap? Finance Research Letters, 47, 102604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeldes, S. P. (1989). Consumption and liquidity constraints: An empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 97(2), 305–346. https://doi.org/10.1086/261605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Yin, Z., & Yue, P. (2023). The impact of access to credit on energy efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103472
   Google Scholar