675
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Government institutional trust and sustainable environment: evidence from BRICS economies

&
Article: 2164032 | Received 26 Jul 2022, Accepted 26 Dec 2022, Published online: 06 Jan 2023

References

  • Abbasi, K. R., Shahbaz, M., Jiao, Z., & Tufail, M. (2021). How energy consumption, industrial growth, urbanization, and CO2 emissions affect economic growth in Pakistan? A novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Energy, 221, 119793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.119793
  • Abid, A., Mehmood, U., Tariq, S., & Haq, Z. U. (2022). The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: Evidence from the G8 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(8), 11654–11662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x
  • Adebayo, T. S. (2022). Renewable energy consumption and environmental sustainability in Canada: Does political stability make a difference? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(40), 61307–61322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20008-4
  • Adebayo, T. S., Oladipupo, S. D., Adeshola, I., & Rjoub, H. (2022). Wavelet analysis of impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on CO2 emissions: Evidence from Portugal. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(16), 23887–23904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17708-8
  • Adeel-Farooq, R. M., Raji, J. O., & Adeleye, B. N. (2020). Economic growth and methane emission: Testing the EKC hypothesis in ASEAN economies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(2), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2020-0149
  • Ahmed, K., & Ahmed, S. (2018). A predictive analysis of CO2 emissions, environmental policy stringency, and economic growth in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(16), 16091–16100.
  • Benlemlih, M., Assaf, C., & El Ouadghiri, I. (2022). Do political and social factors affect carbon emissions? Evidence from international data. Applied Economics, 54(52), 1–14.
  • Berger, D. (2022). Investor sentiment: A retail trader activity approach. Review of Accounting and Finance, 21(2), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-06-2021-0152
  • Bibi, A., Zhang, X., & Umar, M. (2021). The imperativeness of biomass energy consumption to the environmental sustainability of the United States revisited. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 28(4), 821–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-021-00500-9
  • Cheng, Y., Awan, U., Ahmad, S., & Tan, Z. (2021). How do technological innovation and fiscal decentralization affect the environment? A story of the fourth industrial revolution and sustainable growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120398
  • Cheng, C., Ren, X., Dong, K., Dong, X., & Wang, Z. (2021). How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 111818.
  • Çoban, S., & Topcu, M. (2013). The nexus between financial development and energy consumption in the EU: A dynamic panel data analysis. Energy Economics, 39, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.04.001
  • Danish, M., & Ahmad, T. (2018). A review on utilization of wood biomass as a sustainable precursor for activated carbon production and application. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 87, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.003
  • Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1997). Environmental impacts of population and consumption. In Environmentally significant consumption: Research directions (pp. 92–99). National Academy of Sciences. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James-Sweeney-12/publication/265153679_Environmentally_Significant_Consumption_Research_Directions/links/55b7799408aec0e5f4381e63/Environmentally-Significant-Consumption-Research-Directions.pdf#page=101
  • Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A., & York, R. (2007). Driving the human ecological footprint. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[13:DTHEF2.0.CO;2]
  • Dorfleitner, G., & Grebler, J. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and systematic risk: International evidence. The Journal of Risk Finance, 23(1), 85–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-07-2020-0162
  • Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
  • Erdogan, S. (2021). Dynamic nexus between technological innovation and building sector carbon emissions in the BRICS countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112780
  • Fairbrother, M., Sevä, I. J., & Kulin, J. (2019). Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes: Evidence from a survey of 23 European countries. Global Environmental Change, 59, 102003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102003
  • Ferrat, Y., Daty, F., & Burlacu, R. (2021). Short- and long-term effects of responsible investment growth on equity returns. The Journal of Risk Finance, 23(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-07-2021-0107
  • Galinato, G. I., & Galinato, S. P. (2012). The effects of corruption control, political stability and economic growth on deforestation-induced carbon dioxide emissions. Environment and Development Economics, 17(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X11000222
  • Gao, J., O’Sullivan, N., & Sherman, M. (2021). Chinese securities investment funds: The role of luck in performance. Review of Accounting and Finance, 20(5), 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-07-2020-0182
  • Godil, D. I., Yu, Z., Sharif, A., Usman, R., & Khan, S. A. R. (2021). Investigate the role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing transport sector CO2 emission in China: A path toward sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 694–707. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2167
  • Harring, N., & Jagers, S. C. (2013). Should we trust in values? Explaining public support for pro-environmental taxes. Sustainability, 5(1), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5010210
  • Hassan, T., Song, H., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2022). International trade and consumption-based carbon emissions: Evaluating the role of composite risk for RCEP economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(3), 3417–3437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15617-4
  • Hmaittane, A., Bouslah, K., & M’Zali, B. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of equity in controversial industry sectors? Review of Accounting and Finance, 18(4), 635–662. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-09-2018-0184
  • Huang, F. (2019). The impact of downside risk on UK stock returns. Review of Accounting and Finance, 18(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-07-2017-0139
  • Hughes, J. E., & Podolefsky, M. (2015). Getting green with solar subsidies: Evidence from the California solar initiative. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2(2), 235–275. https://doi.org/10.1086/681131
  • Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1987). A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 55(2), 163–172.
  • Ji, X., Zhang, Y., Mirza, N., Umar, M., & Rizvi, S. K. A. (2021). The impact of carbon neutrality on the investment performance: Evidence from the equity mutual funds in BRICS. Journal of Environmental Management, 297, 113228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113228
  • Jiang, L., Sakhare, S. R., & Kaur, M. (2022). Impact of industrial 4.0 on environment along with correlation between economic growth and carbon emissions. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 13(1), 415–423.
  • Kaiser, L., & Welters, J. (2019). Risk-mitigating effect of ESG on momentum portfolios. The Journal of Risk Finance, 20(5), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-05-2019-0075
  • Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
  • Khan, Y., Oubaih, H., & Elgourrami, F. Z. (2022). The role of private investment in ICT on carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) mitigation: Do renewable energy and political risk matter in Morocco? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 52885–52899.
  • Khan, S. A. R., Sharif, A., Golpîra, H., & Kumar, A. (2019). A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: From environmental policy and sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 27(6), 1063–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1958
  • Kirikkaleli, D., Güngör, H., & Adebayo, T. S. (2022). Consumption‐based carbon emissions, renewable energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in Chile. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2945
  • Kongkuah, M., Yao, H., & Yilanci, V. (2022). The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in China: The role of urbanisation and international trade. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(4), 4684–4708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01628-1
  • Leitão, J., Ferreira, J., & Santibanez-González, E. (2022). New insights into decoupling economic growth, technological progress and carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from 40 countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121250
  • Lin, B., & Ma, R. (2022). Green technology innovations, urban innovation environment and CO2 emission reduction in China: Fresh evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121434
  • Lobato, M., Rodríguez, J., & Romero, H. (2021). A volatility-match approach to measure performance: The case of socially responsible exchange traded funds (ETFs). The Journal of Risk Finance, 22(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-04-2020-0066
  • Mughal, N., Arif, A., Jain, V., Chupradit, S., Shabbir, M. S., Ramos-Meza, C. S., & Zhanbayev, R. (2022). The role of technological innovation in environmental pollution, energy consumption and sustainable economic growth: Evidence from South Asian economies. Energy Strategy Reviews, 39, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100745
  • Muhammad, S., Pan, Y., Agha, M. H., Umar, M., & Chen, S. (2022). Industrial structure, energy intensity and environmental efficiency across developed and developing economies: The intermediary role of primary, secondary and tertiary industry. Energy, 247, 123576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123576
  • Murray, B., & Rivers, N. (2015). British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax: A review of the latest “grand experiment” in environmental policy. Energy Policy, 86, 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.011
  • Murshed, M., & Dao, N.T.T. (2022). Revisiting the CO2 emission-induced EKC hypothesis in South Asia: the role of Export Quality Improvement. GeoJournal, 87, 535–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10270-9
  • Nakhli, M. S., Shahbaz, M., Jebli, M. B., & Wang, S. (2022). Nexus between economic policy uncertainty, renewable & non-renewable energy and carbon emissions: Contextual evidence in carbon neutrality dream of USA. Renewable Energy, 185, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.046
  • Newton, K., Stolle, D., & Zmerli, S. (2018). Social and political trust. The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust, 37, 961–976.
  • Obobisa, E. S., Chen, H., & Mensah, I. A. (2022). The impact of green technological innovation and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in African countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121670
  • Omri, A., Kahia, M., & Kahouli, B. (2021). Does good governance moderate the financial development-CO2 emissions relationship? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(34), 47503–47516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14014-1
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  • Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240). Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  • Rahman, M. M., Alam, K., & Velayutham, E. (2022). Reduction of CO2 emissions: The role of renewable energy, technological innovation and export quality. Energy Reports, 8, 2793–2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.200
  • Razzaq, A., Sharif, A., Ahmad, P., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2021). Asymmetric role of tourism development and technology innovation on carbon dioxide emission reduction in the Chinese economy: Fresh insights from QARDL approach. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2139
  • Rhodes, E., Axsen, J., & Jaccard, M. (2017). Exploring citizen support for different types of climate policy. Ecological Economics, 137, 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027
  • Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartiality in the exercise of political power. Governance, 21(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
  • Salari, M., Javid, R. J., & Noghanibehambari, H. (2021). The nexus between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in the US. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.007
  • Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, S. J. H., Ahmad, N., & Alam, S. (2016). Financial development and environmental quality: The way forward. Energy Policy, 98, 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.002
  • Shahbaz, M., Sharma, R., Sinha, A., & Jiao, Z. (2021). Analyzing nonlinear impact of economic growth drivers on CO2 emissions: Designing an SDG framework for India. Energy Policy, 148, 111965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111965
  • Sohail, M. T., Majeed, M. T., Shaikh, P. A., & Andlib, Z. (2022). Environmental costs of political instability in Pakistan: Policy options for clean energy consumption and environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(17), 25184–25193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17646-5
  • Su, C.-W., Mirza, N., Umar, M., Chang, T., & Albu, L. L. (2022). Resource extraction, greenhouse emissions, and banking performance. Resources Policy, 79, 103122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103122
  • Su, C.-W., Umar, M., & Gao, R. (2022). Save the environment, get financing! How China is protecting the environment with green credit policies? Journal of Environmental Management, 323, 116178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116178
  • Su, C.-W., Xie, Y., Shahab, S., Faisal, C. M. N., Hafeez, M., & Qamri, G. M. (2021). Towards achieving sustainable development: Role of technology innovation, technology adoption and CO2 emission for BRICS. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010277
  • Tan, X., Dong, L., Chen, D., Gu, B., & Zeng, Y. (2016). China’s regional CO2 emissions reduction potential: A study of Chongqing city. Applied Energy, 162, 1345–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.071
  • Ulllah, Z., Fen, T. X., Tunio, F. H., & Ullah, I. (2022). Impact of CO2 emissions, exchange rate regimes, and political stability on currency crises: Evidence from South Asian countries. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(2), 29–36.
  • Umar, M., Ji, X., Kirikkaleli, D., & Alola, A. A. (2021). The imperativeness of environmental quality in the United States transportation sector amidst biomass-fossil energy consumption and growth. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124863
  • Umar, M., Mirza, N., Hasnaoui, J. A., & Rochoń, M. P. (2022). The nexus of carbon emissions, oil price volatility, and human capital efficiency. Resources Policy, 78, 102876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102876
  • Wang, Q., & Dong, Z. (2022). Technological innovation and renewable energy consumption: A middle path for trading off financial risk and carbon emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(22), 33046–33062.
  • Wang, Z., Gao, L., Wei, Z., Majeed, A., & Alam, I. (2022). How FDI and technology innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in high-tech industries: Evidence from province-level data of. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(3), 4641–4653.
  • Wang, Q., & Zhang, F. (2021). The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth–evidence from 182 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123838
  • Wei, J., Rahim, S., & Wang, S. (2022). Role of environmental degradation, institutional quality, and government health expenditures for human health: Evidence from emerging seven countries. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 870767. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.870767
  • Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
  • Yang, J., Hao, Y., & Feng, C. (2021). A race between economic growth and carbon emissions: What play important roles towards global low-carbon development? Energy Economics, 100, 105327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105327
  • Yang, S., & Umar, M. (2022). How globalization is reshaping the environmental quality in G7 economies in the presence of renewable energy initiatives? Renewable Energy, 193, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.006
  • York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5
  • Yuan, X., Su, C.-W., Umar, M., Shao, X., & Lobonţ, O.-R. (2022). The race to zero emissions: Can renewable energy be the path to carbon neutrality? Journal of Environmental Management, 308, 114648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114648
  • Zafar, M. W., Saleem, M. M., Destek, M. A., & Caglar, A. E. (2022). The dynamic linkage between remittances, export diversification, education, renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in top remittance‐receiving countries. Sustainable Development, 30(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2236
  • Zeng, S., Li, G., Wu, S., & Dong, Z. (2022). The impact of green technology innovation on carbon emissions in the context of carbon neutrality in China: Evidence from spatial spillover and nonlinear effect analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020730
  • Zhang, D., Ozturk, I., & Ullah, S. (2022). Institutional factors-environmental quality nexus in BRICS: A strategic pillar of governmental performance. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 5777–5789. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2037446
  • Zhao, J., Shahbaz, M., Dong, X., & Dong, K. (2021). How does financial risk affect global CO2 emissions? The role of technological innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120751