Structural defects of industrial system and impacts on CEC's technology diffusion: an approach of multi-regional industrial technology flow tree

References

• Aroche, F. (2006). Trees of the essential economic structures: A qualitative input-output method. Journal of Regional Science, 46(2), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4146.2006.00444.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aroche‐Reyes, F. (2003). A qualitative input‐output method to find basic economic structures. Papers in Regional Science, 82(4), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10110-003-0149-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, W. B. (1976). Empirical identification of key sectors: Some further evidence. Environment and Planning A, 17, 73–99.
   Google Scholar
• Bo, W. G., & Chen, F. (2015). The coordinated development among Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei: Challenges and predicaments. Nankai Journal (Philosophy, Literature and Social Science Edition), 1, 110–118.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, L. R., Wu, X. H., & Du, Z. W. (2022). The spatio-temporal pattern of environmentally-friendly agricultural technology diffusion and its influencing factors: From the social network perspective. Geographical Research, 41(01), 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, P. L., & Shih, H. Y. (2005). Comparing patterns of intersectoral technology diffusion in Taiwan and China: A network analysis. Technovation, 25(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00077-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherif, E. M., & Madkour, J. (2023). Dynamics of the Moroccan industry indices network before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 18(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijbf2023.18.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Debresson, C., & Andersen, E. S. (1996). Economic interdependence and innovative activity: An input-output analysis. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dietzenbacher, E., & Los, B. (2002). Externalities of R&D expenditures. Economic Systems Research, 14(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953531022000024860
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrios, S., Petros, D., & Aggelos, T. (2022). Exploring the structural effects of the ICT sector in the Greek economy: A quantitative approach based on input-output and network analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 46(7), 102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. (2015). Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas. Regional Studies, 49(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.806793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Muñiz, A. S., Raya, A. M., & Carvajal, C. R. (2010). Spanish and European technology diffusion: A structural hole approach in the input–output field. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0247-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Muñiz, A. S., & Vicente, M. R. (2014). ICT technologies in Europe: A study of technological diffusion and economic growth under network theory. Telecommunications Policy, 38(4), 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2013.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha Neogi, P. P., & Goswami, S. (2021). Force of gravity oriented classification technique in machine learning. In N. Sharma, A. Chakrabarti, V. Balas, & J. Martinovic (Eds.), Data management, analytics and innovation. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 1174, pp. 299–310). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5616-6_21
   Google Scholar
• Hauknes, J., & Knell, M. (2009). Embodied knowledge and sectoral linkages: An input–output approach to the interaction of high- and low-tech industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, F., Zhao, S., Bing, T., & Chang, Y. (2017). Hierarchy in industrial structure: The cases of China and the USA. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 469, 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, R. L., & Zhang, X. (2020). A comparative study of industrial multiplier, spillover and feedback effect in the Yangtze River delta region-based on multi-region input-output model. Financial Economics Xinjiang, 224(3), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. (1998). The importance of “spillovers” in the policy mission of the advanced technology program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 23(2), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509888
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. M., Meng, Q. C., & Li, X. Y. (2021). Performance evaluation of regional technological innovation driving high-quality economic development. Statistics & Decision, 37(16), 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao, J. L., Jiang, G. L., & Yang, R. R. (2018). Impact of R&D technology spillovers on carbon emissions between China’s regions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 47, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, J. L., Yang, Y. F., & Bai, Y. (2017). R&D spillovers of China’s industry based on social network. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 10, 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. H., Lee, B. K., & Sohn, S. Y. (2016). Quantifying technology–industry spillover effects based on patent citation network analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leoncini, R., & Montresor, S. (2000). Network analysis of eight technological systems. International Review of Applied Economics, 14(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692170050024750
   Google Scholar
• López, N., & Pérez-Rosés, H. (2015). Degree/diameter problem for mixed graphs. Procedia Computer Science, 74, 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.066
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, M., & Afonso, Ó. (2017). A multi-sector growth model with technology diffusion and networks. Research Policy, 46(7), 1340–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbu, N. P., Tateno, Y., & Bolesta, A. (2021). Structural transformation and production linkages in Asia-Pacific least developed countries: An input-output analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhaven, J., & Dirk, S. (2002). Net multipliers avoid exaggerating impacts: With a Bi-regional illustration for the Dutch transportation sector. Journal of Regional Science, 42(3), 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9787.00270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, W. Q. (2015). Regional economic development in China: An analysis based on spatial spillover effect. Journal of World Economic, 38, 120–142.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, W. Q., Li, Z. N., & Liu, Q. (2011). Inter-industry technology spillover effects in China: Evidence from 35 industry sectors. Economic Research Journal, 46(7), 18–29.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Y. L., Jiang, Y. L., & Jiang, L. H. (2022). A research on transmission effect of innovative network from perspective of industrial relevance. Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University (Social Sciences), 18(3), 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Valente, T. W. (1991). Technology transfer in high-technology industries. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2008). An integrated approach to communication theory and research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. (1982). Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 64(4), 627–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/1923947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sefer, S., & Ercan, S. (2011). The effects of science-technology-innovation on competitiveness and economic growth. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 815–828.
   Google Scholar
• Semitiel-Garcia, M., & Noguera-Mendez, P. (2012). The structure of inter-industry systems and the diffusion of innovations: The case of Spain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1548–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sha, H. (2015). Accelerate the construction of regional collaborative innovation community with the help of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei collaborative development strategy. CPPCC Tianjin Municipal Committee Journal, 336(19), 7.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, M., Hong, J., Liu, G., & Shen, G. Q. (2019). Exploring energy flows embodied in China’s economy from the regional and sectoral perspectives via combination of multi-regional input–output analysis and a complex network approach. Energy, 170, 1191–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timothy, F. B., Erik, B., & Lorin, M. H. (2002). Information technology workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. L., Fan, G., & Hu, L. P. (2019). China’s provincial marketization index report. Social Sciences Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Y. Q., & Miao, Y. C. (2017). Discussion of Industrial Structure in the Integration of Beijing. Tianjin and Hebei. Reformation and Strategy, 33(10), 150–154.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Liu, H., Ruan, Y., Wang, S., Yuan, J., & Lu, H. (2021). A novel method for network design and optimization of district energy systems: Considering network topology planning and pipe diameter. Applied Sciences, 11(4), 1795. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041795
   Google Scholar
• Xie, S. S., & Hu, W. (2021). Coupling and coordination of high-quality economic development and technological innovation: Taking the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region as an example. Statistics & Decision, 37(14), 93–96.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Z. Y., & Jiang, Q. W. (2020). Industrial linkage and spatial spillover effects under regional integration of Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, 4, 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, A. N., & Wang, H. S. (2016). Evolution of government cooperation game in industrial gradient transfer of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Journal of Technology Economics, 35(01), 78–82. +109.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, C. (2017). Modeling industry technology flow network and its structural effects. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 34(16), 62–70.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, C., Ding, Q. Y., Yang, Z. Y., & Cui, Y. X. (2021). Industrial technology diffusion mechanism and innovation synergy effect of central plains urban agglomeration. Science and Technology Management Research, 41(20), 35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X. C., & Zhu, D. P. (2021). Impact of R&D investment on high quality development of Jiangsu economy. Science and Technology Management Research, 41(12), 70–76.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, X. S., Liu, Y. L., & Chen, W. (2023). Research on the coupling and coordination degree between scientific-technical innovation and high-quality economic development—An empirical analysis based on panel data from nineteen major urban agglomerations in China. Resource Development and Market, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo, X. M., Gao, R. Y., Chen, Y. L., Huang, H., Chen, A. J., & Jin, W. (2022). The mechanism of manufacturing cluster network in the Pearl River Delta on technology diffusion. Guangdong Economy, (06), 20–27.
   Google Scholar