Trust in public programmes and distributive (in)justice in taxation

References

• Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciziceno, M., & Pizzuto, P. (2022). Life satisfaction and tax morale: The role of trust in government and cultural orientation. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 97, 101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamage, D. (2014). How should governments promote distributive justice: A framework for analyzing the optimal choice of tax instruments. Tax Law Review, 68, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., & Puranen, B. (eds.) (2022). World values survey: Round seven – Country-pooled Datafile version 5.0. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.20
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, E., Hoelzl, E., & Kirchler, E. (2008). Preconditions of voluntary tax compliance: Knowledge and evaluation of taxation, norms, fairness, and motivation to cooperate. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 216(4), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.216.4.209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khlif, H., Guidara, A., & Hussainey, K. (2016). Sustainability level, corruption and tax evasion: A cross-country analysis Journal of Financial Crime, 23(2), 328–348.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchler, E., & Hoelzl, E. (2017). Economic psychology: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koay, Y. Y., Keh, C. G., Tang, S. E., Tan, Y. T., & Chan, L. M. (2020). Can the “tax the rich, subsidise the poor” policy improve financial satisfaction among Malaysians? International Journal of Management Studies, 27(2), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms.27.1.2020.8005
   Google Scholar
• Korgaonkar, C. N. (2022). The determinant of tax morale in India. NIPFP Working Paper Series No 381. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Kouamé, W. A. (2017). Tax morale and trust in public institutions. Cahier de Recherche/Working Paper, 15, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Koumpias, A., Leonardo, G., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2021). Trust in government institutions and tax morale. FinanzArchiv, 77(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1628/fa-2021-0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardo, G., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (August 2016). Politicians, bureaucrats, and tax morale: What shapes tax compliance attitudes?. International Studies Program Working Paper No. 16-08. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Matthaei, E., Chan, H. F., Schmidt, C., & Torgler, B. (2023). Relative trust and tax morale. Economic and Political Studies, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2022.2157235
   Google Scholar
• McGee, R. W., Benk, S., & Yüzbaşı, B. (2019b). Should governments tax the rich and subsidize the poor? A comparative study of Muslim and Christian respondents. Religions, 10(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, R. W., & Yoon, Y. (2018). Should governments tax the rich and subsidize the poor? An empirical study of South Korean opinion. Journal of Accounting, Ethics and Public Policy, 19(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, R. W., Yoon, Y., & Liu, Z. (2019a). Should governments tax the rich and subsidize the poor? An empirical study of German opinion. Journal of Accounting, Ethics and Public Policy, 20(2), 201–223.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, D. V., Evans, J. H., III., & Kim, C. K. (1995). The effects of horizontal and exchange inequity on tax reporting decisions. Accounting Review, 70(4), 619–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, J. (2020). Distributive justice and taxation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. L., & Roberts, T. L. (2020). Distributive Justice and the Tax Fairness Partisan Divide. In Advances in taxation (Vol. 28, pp. 73–99). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Justicia, D., & Theilen, B. (2022). Immigration and tax morale: The role of perceptions and prejudices. Empirical Economics, 62(4), 1801–1832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02083-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugin, L. (2004). Theories of distributive justice and limitations on taxation: What Rawls demands from tax systems. Fordham Law Review, 72(5), 1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgler, B. (2004). Cross-culture comparison of tax morale and tax compliance: Evidence from Costa Rica and Switzerland. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 45(1-2), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715204048309
   Google Scholar
• Torgler, B. (2003). Tax morale and institutions. Working Paper No. 2003-09. Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijke, M., Gobena, L. B., & Verboon, P. (2019). Make me want to pay. A three-way interaction between procedural justice, distributive justice, and power on voluntary tax compliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verboon, P., & Van Dijke, M. (2007). A self-interest analysis of justice and tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(6), 704–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M. (2003). Tax compliance and the psychology of justice: Mapping the field. In Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and evasion. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, Y. (2020). An exercise on human values, ethics, and political economy. Journal of Accounting, Ethics and Public Policy, 21(1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar