The usefulness of well-being temporalism

References

• Alexandrova, A., & Fabian, M. (2022). Democratising measurement: Or why thick concepts call for coproduction. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 12(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00437-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angner, E. (2011). Are subjective measures of well-being “direct”? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400903401665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, I. (2020). Evidence, policy and wellbeing. Palgrave MacMillian. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21376-3
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, N. (2021). Eudaimonia and Kleos: An analysis of legacy’s contribution to well-being. Philosophy, Politics, and Economics Review, 1, 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bernanke, B. (2012). Economic measurement. 32nd general conference of the international association for research in income and wealth. www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20120806a.htm
   Google Scholar
• Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogen, J., & Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review, 97(3), 303–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. (2009). Well-being and death. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. (2021). A defense of temporal well-being. Res Philosophica, 98(1), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramble, B. (2018). The passing of temporal well-being. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, P. (1980). Prudence. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(7), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2010). PM speech on wellbeing. www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-on-wellbeing
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. M. (2020). Well-being and the good death. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 23(3–4), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10101-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, A., & Rossi, M. (2019). Is children’s wellbeing different from adults’ wellbeing? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 49(8), 1146–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2019.1619354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, A., & Levy, A. (2019). Why experiments matter. Inquiry, 62(9–10), 1066–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2018.1533883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00030.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsey, D. (2015). The significance of a life’s shape. Ethics, 125(2), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1086/678373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsey, D. (2017). A good death. Utilitas, 29(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820816000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsey, D. (2018). Prudence and past selves. Philosophical Studies, 175(8), 1901–1925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0940-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. C. (2017). A tapestry of values. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. C., & McKaughan, D. J. (2014). Nonepistemic values and the multiple goals of science. Philosophy of Science, 81(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/674345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabian, M. (2021). Improving interdisciplinary research in well-being—A review with further comments of michael bishop’s the good life: Unifying the philosophy and psychology of well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(6), 2829–2844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00333-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, F. (2004). Pleasure and the good life. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferracioli, L. (2020). Carefreeness and children’s wellbeing. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 37(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2014). What from learn economists can happiness. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.40.2.402
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. (2011). The pursuit of happiness; An economy of well-being. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., Sharpe, A., Sirgy, J., & Vogel, J. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55(1), 1–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010811312332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haybron, D., & Tiberius, V. (2015). Well-being policy: What standard of well-being? Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1(04), 712–733. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2015.23
   Google Scholar
• Hersch, G. (2015). Can an evidential account justify relying on preferences for well-being policy? Journal of Economic Methodology, 22(3), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1071507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersch, G. (2018). The narrowed domain of disagreement for well-being policy. Public Affairs Quarterly, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/26897020
   Google Scholar
• Hersch, G. (forthcoming). Well-being coherentism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1086/714806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersch, G., & Weltman, D. (forthcoming). A new well-being atomism. Philosophy and Phenomological Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. (1994). Me and my life. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 94(1), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/94.1.309
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533006776526030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94(2), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041301713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppinen, A. (2015). The narrative calculus. Airbus, 5. http://www.airbus.com/company/history/the-narrative/
   Google Scholar
• King, O. C. (2018). Pulling apart well-being at a time and the goodness of a life. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 5(20201214), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.013
   Google Scholar
• Kyburg, H. (1984). Theory and measurement. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Layard, R. (2005). Lessons from a new science. Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, N. (2011). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthewson, J., & Weisberg, M. (2009). The structure of tradeoffs in model building. Synthese, 170(1), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9366-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1909). Autobiography. In C. E. Norton (Ed.), P. F. Collier & Son Company.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, E. R., Anderson, G. C., & Bergman, N. (2007). Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), CD003519. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003519.pub2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. S. (2013). Nature’s experiments and natural experiments in the social sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 43(3), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393113489100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné-Bosch, S. (2018). Limits to tree growth and longevity. Trends in Plant Science, 23(11), 985–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutley, S., Powell, A., & Dacies, H. (2013). What counts as good evidence ?
   Google Scholar
• Nutter, G. W. (1951). The extent of enterprise monopoly in the United States, 1899–1939: A quantitative study of some aspects of monopoly. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G., Deaton, A., Durand, M., Halpern, D., & Layard, R. (2014). Wellbeing and policy. Legatum Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. S. (2020). Model evaluation: An adequacy-for-purpose view. Philosophy of Science, 87(3pot), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1086/708691
   Google Scholar
• Ponthiere, G. (2016). Lifetime well-being. In M. Adler, & M. Fleurbaey (Eds.), Oxford handbook of well- being and public policy (pp. 871–900). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potochnik, A. (2017). Idealization and the aims of science. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raibley, J. (2016). Atomism and holism in the theory of personal well-being. In G. Fletcher (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the philosophy of well-being (pp. 58–70). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. M. (2018). The extended body: On aging, disability, and well-being. Hastings Center Report, 48, S31–S36. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosati, C. S. (2013). The story of a life. Social Philosophy and Policy, 30(1–2), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052513000022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosati, C. S. (2021). The normative significance of temporal well-being. Res Philosophica, 98(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D., Boylan, J. M., & Kirsch, J. A. (2021). Advancing the science of well-being: A dissenting view on measurement recommendations. In Measuring Well-Being: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Social Sciences and the Humanities (pp. 521–535). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197512531.003.0019
   Google Scholar
• Schliesser, E. (2012). Inventing paradigms, monopoly, methodology, and mythology at “Chicago”: Nutter, Stigler, and Milton Friedman. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 43(1), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slote, M. (1982). Goods and lives. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 63(4), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1982.tb00109.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N., Li, W., Foley, R. J., Wheeler, J. C., Pooley, D., Chornock, R., Filippenko, A. V., Silverman, J. M., Quimby, R., Bloom, J. S., & Hansen, C. (2007). SN 2006gy: Discovery of the most luminous supernova ever recorded, powered by the death of an extremely massive star like η carinae. The Astrophysical Journal, 666(2), 1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1086/519949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollis, K., Yap, M., Campbell, P., & Biddle, N. (2021). Conceptualisations of wellbeing and quality of life. Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354323573_Conceptualisations_of_wellbeing_and_quality_of_life_A_systematic_review_of_participatory_studies
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, Y., Tamakoshi, K., Matsushima, M., & Kawabe, T. (2011). Comparison of salivary cortisol, heart rate, and oxygen saturation between early skin-to-skin contact with different initiation and duration times in healthy, full-term infants. Early Human Development, 87(3), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal, E. (2013). Old and new problems in philosophy of measurment. Philosophy Compass, 12, 1159–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12089
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Temkin, L. S. (2012). Rethinking the good: Moral ideals and the nature of practical reasoning. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting. Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thukral, A., Sankar, M. J., Agarwal, R., Gupta, N., Deorari, A. K., & Paul, V. K. (2012). Early skin-to-skin contact and breast-feeding behavior in term neonates: A randomized controlled trial. Neonatology, 102(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1159/000337839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderweele, T. J. (2017). On the promotion of human flourishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(31), 8148–8156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702996114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderWeele, T. J., Trudel-Fitzgerald, C., Allin, P. V., Farrelly, C., Fletcher, G., Frederick, D. E., Hall, J., Helliwell, J. F., Kim, E. S., Lauinger, W. A., Lee, M. T., Lyubomirsky, S., Margolis, S., McNeely, E., Messer, N. G., Tay, L., Vish Viswanath, K., Weziak-Białowolska, D., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2021). Current recommendations on the selection of measures for well-being. In Measuring Well-Being: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Social Sciences and the Humanities (pp. 501–520). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197512531.003.0018
   Google Scholar
• Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction-research. Social Indicators Research, 37(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, J. D. (1991). Well-being and time. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 72(1), 48–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1991.tb00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Višak, T. (2021). How to resist Bramble's arguments against temporal well-being? Res Philosophica, 98(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijers, D., & Jarden, A. (2013). The science of happiness for policymakers: An overview. Journal of Social Research & Policy, 4(2), 21–40. http://hdl.handle.net/11072/1629
   Google Scholar
• Wren-lewis, S. (2013). Well-being as a primary good: Towards legitimate well-being policy. Philosophy & Public Policy Quarterly, 31(2), 2+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A350578224/AONE?u=anon~92303684&sid=googleScholar&xid=58181456
   Google Scholar