Visual features drive attentional bias for threat

References

• Almeida, I., Soares, S. C., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2015). The distinct role of the amygdala, superior colliculus and pulvinar in processing of central and peripheral snakes. PLoS One, 10(6), e0129949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayle, D. J., Henaff, M. A., & Krolak-Salmon, P. (2009). Unconsciously perceived fear in peripheral vision alerts the limbic system: A MEG study. PLoS One, 4(12), e8207. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, D. V., Anderson, U. S., Mortensen, C. R., Neufeld, S. L., & Neel, R. (2011). The face in the crowd effect unconfounded: Happy faces, not angry faces, are more efficiently detected in single- and multiple-target visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 637–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchette, I. (2006). Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: How specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(8), 1484–1504. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980543000204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosch, T., & Sharma, D. (2005). The role of fear-relevant stimuli in visual search: A comparison of phylogenetic and ontogenetic stimuli. Emotion, 5(3), 360–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., El-Deredy, W., & Blanchette, I. (2010). Attentional modulation of visual-evoked potentials by threat: Investigating the effect of evolutionary relevance. Brain and Cognition, 74(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burra, N., Coll, S. Y., Barras, C., & Kerzel, D. (2017). Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions: Naturalistic faces. Neuroscience Letters, 637, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2016.11.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burra, N., Pittet, C., Barras, C., & Kerzel, D. (2019). Attentional suppression is delayed for threatening distractors. Visual Cognition, 27(3–4), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2019.1593272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, M. G., Nummenmaa, L., & Hyönä, J. (2008). Emotional scenes in peripheral vision: Selective orienting and gist processing, But not content identification. Emotion, 8(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinq-Mars, J., Blumenthal, A., Grund, A., Hétu, S., & Blanchette, I. (2022). DLPFC controls the rapid neural response to visual threat: An ERP and rTMS study. Brain Research, 1784, 147850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2022.147850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. M., & Purkis, H. (2009). The origins of specific phobias: Influential theories and current perspectives. Review of General Psychology, 13(4), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csathó, Á, Tey, F., & Davis, G. (2008). Threat perception and targeting: The brainstem–amygdala–cortex alarm system in action? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(7–8), 1039–1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290801996360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey, G. C. L. (1995). Preparedness and phobias: Specific evolved associations or a generalized expectancy bias? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(02), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00038498
   Google Scholar
• Epling, S. L., Russell, P. N., & Helton, W. S. (2016). A new semantic vigilance task: Vigilance decrement, workload, and sensitivity to dual-task costs. Experimental Brain Research, 234(1), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4444-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E., Griggs, L., & Mouchlianitis, E. (2007). The detection of fear-relevant stimuli: Are guns noticed as quickly as snakes? Emotion, 7(4), 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681–700. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11757875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E., Russo, R., & Georgiou, G. A. (2005). Anxiety modulates the degree of attentive resources required to process emotional faces. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(4), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.4.396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., LoBue, V., Irving, J., & Harvey, T. (2017). The effect of spatial frequency information and visual similarity in threat detection. Cognition and Emotion, 31(5), 912–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1180280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Y., Piper, W. T., Branigan, L. A., Vazey, E. M., Aston-Jones, G., Lin, L., LeDoux, J. E., & Sears, R. M. (2020). A brainstem-central amygdala circuit underlies defensive responses to learned threats. Molecular Psychiatry, 25(3), 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0599-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedger, N., Gray, K. L. H., Garner, M., & Adams, W. J. (2016). Are visual threats prioritized without awareness? A critical review and meta-analysis involving 3 behavioral paradigms and 2696 observers. Psychological Bulletin, 142(9), 934–968. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, A., Mogg, K., De Fockert, J., Nielsen, M. K., & Bradley, B. P. (2014). Electrophysiological evidence for greater attention to threat when cognitive control resources are depleted. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 827–835. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0212-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, M. C., Goldinger, S. D., & Brady, K. J. (2014). MM-MDS: A multidimensional scaling database with similarity ratings for 240 object categories from the massive memory picture database. PLoS One, 9(11), e112644. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamovi Project. (2022). Jamovi (Version 2.3 for Windows). https://www.jamovi.org
   Google Scholar
• Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Attention to threat in anxiety-prone individuals: Mechanisms underlying attentional bias. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30(5), 635–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9042-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., Van Damme, S., & Wiersema, J. R. (2006). Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(12), 1757–1771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, C. L., Aronoff, J., & Stearns, J. J. (2007). The shape of threat: Simple geometric forms evoke rapid and sustained capture of attention. Emotion, 7(3), 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J. E. (2022). As soon as there was life, there was danger: The deep history of survival behaviours and the shallower history of consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1844), 20210292. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddell, B. J., Brown, K. J., Kemp, A. H., Barton, M. J., Das, P., Peduto, A., Gordon, E., & Williams, L. M. (2005). A direct brainstem–amygdala–cortical ‘alarm’ system for subliminal signals of fear. NeuroImage, 24(1), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoBue, V. (2010). And along came a spider: An attentional bias for the detection of spiders in young children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoBue, V. (2014). Deconstructing the snake: The relative roles of perception, cognition, and emotion on threat detection. Emotion, 14(4), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoBue, V., Matthews, K., Harvey, T., & Stark, S. L. (2014). What accounts for the rapid detection of threat? Evidence for an advantage in perceptual and behavioral responding from eye movements. Emotion, 14(4), 816–823. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, C., Falciati, L., Maioli, C., & Mirabella, G. (2020). Threatening facial expressions impact goal-directed actions only if task-relevant. Brain Sciences, 10(11), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, D. S., Gaertner, L., & Olson, M. A. (2017). In harm’s Way: On preferential response to threatening stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(11), 1519–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217722558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, D. S., Gaertner, L., & Olson, M. A. (2018). On the prioritized processing of threat in a dual implicit process model of evaluation. Psychological Inquiry, 29(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2018.1435680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, M., & Sutherland, M. R. (2011). Arousal-Biased competition in perception and memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611400234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally, R. J. (2018). Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity? Clinical Psychology Review, 69, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPR.2018.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mineka, S., & Öhman, A. (2002). Phobias and preparedness: The selective, automatic, and encapsulated nature of fear. Biological Psychiatry, 52(10), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01669-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2018). Anxiety and threat-related attention: Cognitive-motivational framework and treatment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesse, R. M. (2006). The smoke detector principle. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 935(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03472.x
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, A., Soares, S. C., Juth, P., Lindström, B., & Esteves, F. (2012). Evolutionary derived modulations of attention to two common fear stimuli: Serpents and hostile humans. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.629603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakai-Stecina, D. T., Hout, M. C., Bali, C., & Zsido, A. N. (2023). Can the processing of task-irrelevant threatening stimuli be inhibited? – The role of shape and valence in the saliency of threatening objects.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1-2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke, A., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2009). Selective visual working memory in fear of spiders: The role of automaticity and material-specificity. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(8), 1053–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigoulot, S., D’Hondt, F., Honoré, J., & Sequeira, H. (2012). Implicit emotional processing in peripheral vision: Behavioral and neural evidence. Neuropsychologia, 50(12), 2887–2896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010a). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010b). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2011). Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory. Visual Cognition, 19(7), 956–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2011.603709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subra, B., Muller, D., Fourgassie, L., Chauvin, A., & Alexopoulos, T. (2017). Of guns and snakes: Testing a modern threat superiority effect. Cognition and Emotion, 32(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1284044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo, N., Gómez, D., Trujillo, S., López, J. D., Ibáñez, A., & Parra, M. A. (2021). Attentional bias during emotional processing: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an emotional flanker task. PLoS One, 16(4 April 2021), e0249407. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Strien, J. W., Christiaans, G., Franken, I. H. A., & Huijding, J. (2016). Curvilinear shapes and the snake detection hypothesis: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 53(2), 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. M., Palmer, D., Liddell, B. J., Song, L., & Gordon, E. (2006). The ‘when’ and ‘where’ of perceiving signals of threat versus non-threat. NeuroImage, 31(1), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2021). Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(4), 1060–1092. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Yee, A., & Friedman-Hill, S. R. (1992). Curvature is a basic feature for visual search tasks. Perception, 21(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1068/p210465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsido, A. N., Bali, C., Kocsor, F., & Hout, M. C. (2022). Task-irrelevant threatening information is harder to ignore than other valences. Emotion, 23(6), 1606–1617. https://doi.org/10.1037/EMO0001189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsido, A. N., Bernath, L., Labadi, B., & Deak, A. (2018a). Count on arousal: Introducing a new method for investigating the effects of emotional valence and arousal on visual search performance. Psychological Research, 84(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0974-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsido, A. N., Csatho, A., Matuz, A., Stecina, D., Arato, A., Inhof, O., & Darnai, G. (2019). Does threat have an advantage after all? – Proposing a novel experimental design to investigate the advantages of threat-relevant cues in visual processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsido, A. N., Deak, A., Losonci, A., Stecina, D., Arato, A., & Bernath, L. (2018). Investigating evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli in preschool children. Acta Psychologica, 185, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsido, A. N., Matuz, A., Inhof, O., Darnai, G., Budai, T., Bandi, S., & Csatho, A. (2020). Disentangling the facilitating and hindering effects of threat-related stimuli – A visual search study. British Journal of Psychology, 111(4), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsido, A. N., Matuz, A., Julia, B., Darnai, G., & Csathó, Á. (2023). The interference of negative emotional stimuli on semantic vigilance performance in a dual-task setting. Biologia Futura, 1, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-023-00180-5
   Google Scholar
• Zsido, A. N., Stecina, D. T., Cseh, R., & Hout, M. C. (2021). The effects of task-irrelevant threatening stimuli on orienting- and executive attentional processes under cognitive load. British Journal of Psychology, 113(2), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsido, A. N., Stecina, D. T., & Hout, M. C. (2022). Task demands determine whether shape or arousal of a stimulus modulates competition for visual working memory resources. Acta Psychologica, 224, 103523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar