On the effectiveness of democracy aid in post-civil war recipient countries

Bibliography

• Alihodžić, Sead, Nicholas Matatu, Oliver Joseph, and Katrin Lewis. Timing and Sequencing of Transitional Elections: International Idea Policy Paper No. 18. Stockholm: International IDEA, 2019. https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/timing-and-sequencing-transitional-elections.
   Google Scholar
• Altunbas, Yener, and John Thornton. “The (Small) Blessing of Foreign Aid: Further Evidence on Aid’s Impact on Democracy.” Applied Economics 46, no. 32 (2014): 3922–3930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, Manuel, and Stephen Bond. “Some Test of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” The Review of Economic Studies 58, no. 2 (1991): 277–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, Pauline. “Conflict Resolution Versus Democratic Governance: Diverging Paths to Peace?” In Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, edited by Chester A. Crocker, Fen O. Hampson, and Pamela R. Aall, 753–764. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett. “Aid is Not Oil: Donor Utility, Heterogeneous Aid, and the Aid-Democratization Relationship.” International Organization 70, no. 1 (2016): 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, Timothy, and Torsten Persson. “State Capacity, Conflict, and Development.” Econometrica 78, no. 1 (2010): 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boese, Vanessa A., Nazifa Alizada, Martin Lundstedt, Kelly Morrison, Natalia Natsika, Yuko Sato, Hugo Tai, and Staffan I. Lindberg. Autocratization Changing Nature? Democracy Report 2022. Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute at the University of Gothenburg, 2022. https://v-dem.net/media/publications/dr_2022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bosin, Yury V. “Supporting Democracy in the Former Soviet Union: Why the Impact of US Assistance has Been Below Expectations.” International Studies Quarterly 56, no. 2 (2012): 405–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancati, Dawn, and Jack L. Snyder. “Time to Kill: The Impact of Election Timing on Postconflict Stability.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 57, no. 5 (2013): 822–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, Derick W. Governance in Post-Conflict Societies: Rebuilding Fragile States. London: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, Sarah S. The Taming of Democracy Assistance: Why Democracy Promotion Does Not Confront Dictators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, Herbert. History and Human Relations. London: Collins, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Call, Charles T. Why Peace Fails: The Causes and Prevention of Civil War Recurrence. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, Thomas. Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, Thomas. “Democracy Assistance: Political Vs. Developmental?” Journal of Democracy 20, no. 1 (2009): 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, Thomas. “Democracy Assistance: The Question of Strategy.” Democratization 4, no. 3 (1997): 109–132.
   Google Scholar
• Cederman, Lars-Erik, Simon Hug, and Lutz F. Krebs. “Democratization and Civil War: Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Peace Research 47, no. 4 (2010): 377–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvet, Lisa, and Paul Collier. “What Are the Preconditions for Turnarounds in Failing States?” Conflict Management and Peace Science 25, no. 4 (2008): 332–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler. “Aid, Policy and Growth in Post-Conflict Societies.” European Economic Review 48, no. 5 (2004): 1125–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Stephen D. “Can America Finance Freedom? Assessing U.S. Democracy Promotion Via Economic Statecraft.” Foreign Policy Analysis 5, no. 4 (2009): 367–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, et al. V-Dem Codebook V11, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, Agnes. “Does Regime Type Matter for the Impact of Democracy Aid on Democracy?” Democratization 20, no. 4 (2013): 642–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zeeuw, Jeroen, and Krishna Kumar. “Democracy Assistance to Postconflict Societies.” In Promoting Democracy in Postconflict Societies, edited by Jeroen de Zeeuw, and Krishna Kumar, 1–24. London: Lynne Rienner, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry. “Promoting Democracy in Post-Conflict and Failed States: Lessons and Challenges.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 2, no. 2 (2006): 96–116.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, Simone, and Joseph Wright. “Foreign Aid Allocation Tactics and Democratic Change in Africa.” The Journal of Politics 77, no. 1 (2015): 216–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaubauer, Julian, Dierk Herzer, and Peter Nunnenkamp. “The Effectiveness of Aid Under Post-Conflict Conditions: A Sector-Specific Analysis.” The Journal of Development Studies 55, no. 4 (2019): 720–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donno, Daniela, and Michael Neureiter. “Can Human Rights Conditionality Reduce Repression? Examining the European Union’s Economic Agreements.” The Review of International Organizations 13, no. 3 (2018): 335–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, Thad. “Conditioning the Effects of Aid: Cold War Politics, Donor Credibility, and Democracy in Africa.” International Organization 58, no. 2 (2004): 409–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe (NDICI – Global Europe). https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/funding-and-technical-assistance/neighbourhood-development-and-international-cooperation-instrument-global-europe-ndici-global-europe_en.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, Charlotte, Jörn Grāvingholt, Julia Leininger, and Karina Mross. “Gradual, Cooperative, Coordinated: Effective Support for Peace and Democracy in Conflict-Affected States.” International Studies Perspectives 21, no. 1 (2020): 54–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, Steven E., Aníbal S. Pérez-Liñán, Chris Belasco, and Michael Neureiter. Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building: Report on Phase III Activities. Chicago: NORC at the University of Chicago, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, Steven E., Aníbal S. Pérez-Liñán, Michael Neureiter, and Chris A. Belasco. Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building, 1990-2014: An Update, Working Paper 436. A Democratization Theory Research Cluster Paper. Notre Dame: Kellog Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, Steven E., Aníbal S. Pérez-Liñán, and Mitchell A. Seligson. “The Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building, 1990-2003.” World Politics 59, no. 3 (2007): 404–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, Thomas E., and Irfan Nooruddin. “Financing the Peace: Evaluating World Bank Post-Conflict Assistance Programs.” The Review of International Organizations 4, no. 1 (2009): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortna, Virginia P. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• François, Monika, and Inder Sud. “Promoting Stability and Development in Fragile and Failed States.” Development Policy Review 24, no. 2 (2006): 141–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gafuri, Adea. “Can Democracy Aid Improve Democracy? The European Union’s Democracy Assistance 2002-2018.” Democratization 29, no. 5 (2021): 777–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garriga, Ana C., and Brian J. Phillips. “Foreign Aid as a Signal to Investors: Predicting FDI in Post-Conflict Countries.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58, no. 2 (2014): 280–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershman, Carl, and Michael Allen. “The Assault on Democracy Assistance.” Journal of Democracy 17, no. 2 (2006): 36–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Clark C., Krister Andersson, Elinor Ostrom, and Sujai Shivakumar. The Samaritan’s Dilemma: The Political Economy of Development Aid. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Clark C., Barak D. Hoffman, and Ryan S. Jablonski. “Did Aid Promote Democracy in Africa? The Role of Technical Assistance in Africa’s Transitions.” World Development 68 (2015): 323–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. All International Politics Is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration, and Democratization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, Sonja, and Okka Lou Mathis. “Democratization via aid? The European Union’s Democracy Promotion in the Western Balkans 1994–2010.” European Union Politics 19, no. 1 (2018): 163–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, Sonja, and Okka Lou Mathis. “Stability First, Development Second, Democracy Third: The European Union's Policy Towards the Post-Conflict Western Balkans, 1991–2010.” Europe-Asia Studies 67, no. 6 (2015): 916–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartzell, Caroline A., and Matthew Hoddie. “Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management.” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 2 (2003): 318–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegre, Håvard, Tanja Ellingsen, Scott Gates, and Nils Petter Gleditsch. “Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816-1992.” American Political Science Review 95, no. 1 (2001): 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herz, John H. Political Realism and Political Idealism: A Study in Theories and Realities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Höglund, Kristine. “Violence in War-to-Democracy Transitions.” In From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding, edited by Anna K. Jarstad, and Timothy D. Sisk, 80–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hornat, Jan. Transatlantic Democracy Assistance: Promoting Different Models of Democracy. New York: Routledge, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Ross. International Media Assistance: A Review of Donor Activities and Lessons Learned. Working Paper 19, Democratic Transition in Post-Conflict Societies. Building Local Institutions. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations, 2003. https://static.twoday.net/epicentre/files/Clingendael.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, Susan D. “Catch Us If You Can: Election Monitoring and International Norm Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 55, no. 2 (2011): 356–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarstad, Anna K., and Timothy D. Sisk, eds. From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Jarstad, Anna K., and Timothy D. Sisk. “Introduction.” In From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding, edited by Anna K. Jarstad, and Timothy D. Sisk, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30, no. 2 (1978): 167–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, Madhav. “Post-civil War Democratization: Promotion of Democracy in Post-Civil War States, 1946–2005.” Democratization 17, no. 5 (2010): 826–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyvitis, Sarantis, and Irene Vlachaki. “Democratic Aid and the Democratization of Recipients.” Contemporary Economic Policy 28, no. 2 (2010): 188–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalilpour, Golareh. Western Conceptions of Democracy and the Transatlantic Divide Over Democracy Promotion: Media Debates in the Context of Military Intervention. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Knack, Stephen, and Aminur Rahman. “Donor Fragmentation and Bureaucratic Quality in Aid Recipients.” Journal of Development Economics 83, no. 1 (2007): 176–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopstein, Jeffrey. “The Transatlantic Divide Over Democracy Promotion.” The Washington Quarterly 29, no. 2 (2006): 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappin, Richard. “The Unique Challenges of Post-Conflict Democracy Assistance.” Peace Review 22, no. 2 (2010): 178–183.
   Google Scholar
• Licht, Amanda A. “Coming Into Money: The Impact of Foreign Aid on Leader Survival.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54, no. 1 (2010): 58–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, Jennifer. “Democratization and Stability in East Asia.” International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 2 (2011): 409–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührmann, Anna, Kelly McMann, and Carolien van Ham. Democracy Aid Effectiveness: Variation Across Regime Types. Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute at the University of Gothenburg, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, Edward D., and Jack Snyder. Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Matanock, Aila M. Electing Peace: From Civil Conflict to Political Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nowack, Daniel, and Julia Leininger. “Protecting Democracy from Abroad: Democracy Aid Against Attempts to Circumvent Presidential Term Limits.” Democratization 29, no. 1 (2022): 154–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. “DAC and CRS Code Lists.” https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-standards/dacandcrscodelists.htm.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. “States of Fragility 2020.” https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/states-of-fragility-2020_ba7c22e7-en.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, Roland. At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, Roland, and Timothy D. Sisk. The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations. London: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal S. “Democracies.” In Comparative Politics, edited by Daniele Caramani, 83–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, Patrick M., and Sam R. Bell. “Changing Lanes or Stuck in the Middle: Why Are Anocracies More Prone to Civil Wars?” Political Research Quarterly 63, no. 4 (2010): 747–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, Benjamin. International Electoral Assistance: A Review of Donor Activities and Lessons Learned. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations, 2003. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/20030600_cru_working_paper_17.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Riese, Sarah, Nora Röhner, and Christoph Zürcher. “External Strategies for Post-Conflict Democratization: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, and Macedonia.” In OSCE Yearbook 2010, edited by IFSH, 265–281. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, Jesse D. “Military Size and the Effectiveness of Democracy Assistance.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61, no. 4 (2017): 839–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savun, Burcu, and Daniel C. Tirone. “Foreign Aid, Democratization, and Civil Conflict: How Does Democracy Aid Affect Civil Conflict?” American Journal of Political Science 55, no. 2 (2010): 233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Ulrich Sedelmeier. “Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 11, no. 4 (2004): 661–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, Danny. Investigating Corruption in the Afghan Police Force: Instability and Insecurity in Post-Conflict Societies. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Sisk, Timothy D. “Peacebuilding as Democratization: Findings and Recommendations.” In From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding, edited by Anna K. Jarstad, and Timothy D. Sisk, 239–259. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Snider, Erin A. “US Democracy Aid and the Authoritarian State: Evidence from Egypt and Morocco.” International Studies Quarterly 62, no. 4 (2018): 795–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, Jack. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Violence. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, Håvard, and Håvard Hegre. Trends in Armed Conflict, 1946-2020. Oslo: PRIO, 2021. https://www.prio.org/publications/12756.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, Håvard, Siri Aas Rustad, Henrik Urdal, and Håvard Mokleiv Nygård. Trends in Armed Conflict, 1946-2018. Oslo: PRIO, 2019. https://www.prio.org/publications/11349.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Shiping. “The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis.” Security Studies 18, no. 3 (2009): 587–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Hoove, Lotte, and Álvaro Pinto Scholtbach. “Democracy and Political Party Assistance in Post-Conflict Societies.” NIMD Knowledge Centre Publication. https://epd.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/NIMD-Democracy-and-Political-Party-Assistance-in-Post-Conflict-Societies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UCDP. “UCDP Definitions,” Uppsala University Department of Peace and Conflict Research. https://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/definitions/.
   Google Scholar
• von Borzyskowski, Inken. “Resisting Democracy Assistance: Who Seeks and Receives Technical Election Assistance?” The Review of International Organizations 11, no. 2 (2016): 247–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, Barbara F. “Designing Transitions from Civil War: Demobilization, Democratization, and Commitments to Peace.” International Security 24, no. 1 (1999): 127–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Joseph, and Matthew Winters. “The Politics of Effective Foreign Aid.” Annual Review of Political Science 13, no. 1 (2010): 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulueta-Fülscher, Kimana. “Democracy-Support Effectiveness in ‘Fragile States’: A Review.” International Studies Perspectives 16, no. 1 (2014): 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Zürcher, Christoph, Carrie Manning, Kristie D. Evenson, Rachel Hayman, Sarah Riese, and Nora Röhner. Costly Democracy: Peacebuilding and Democratization After War. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar