Safety and efficacy of nintedanib for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

References

• Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M. Globocan 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC cancerbase no. 11. [ cited 2017 Feb15]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. SEER stat fact sheets: colon and rectum cancer. [ cited2017 Jun 15]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html
   Google Scholar
• Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355(9209):1041–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advancedcolorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(16):2938–2947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, et al. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patientswith previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4697–4705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Lang I, et al. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according totumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2011–2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann V, Von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(10):1065–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz H, Niedzwiecki D, Innocenti F, et al. CALGB/SWOG 80405: phase III trial of FOLFIRI or mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab or cetuximab for patients with expanded RAS analyses in untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(5):1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2013;381(9863):303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Qin S, Xu R, et al. CONCUR Investigators. Regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CONCUR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):619–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1909–1919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Cutsem E, Yoshino T, Lenz H, et al. Nintedanib plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC for the treatment of patients (pts) with colorectal cancer (CRC) refractory to standard therapies: results of the phase III LUME-colon 1 study. Ann Oncol. 2016. Abstract LBA_20_PR.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:581–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presta M, Dell’Era P, Mitola S, et al. Fibroblast growth factor/fibroblast growth factor receptor system in angiogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16:159–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber R, Thurnher A, Katsen AD, et al. Combined inhibition of VEGF and PDGF signaling enforces tumor vessel regression by interfering with pericyte-mediated endothelial cell survival mechanisms. Faseb J. 2004;18(2):338–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compagni A, Wilgenbus P, Impagnatiello MA, et al. Fibroblast growth factors are required for efficient tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2000;60:7163–7169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando NT, Koch M, Rothrock C, et al. Tumor escape from endogenous extracellular matrix-associated angiogenesis inhibitors by up-regulation of multiple proangiogenic factors. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1529–1539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reck M, Kaiser R, Mellemgaard A, et al. Docetaxel plus nintedanib versus docetaxel plus placebo in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 1): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:143–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna NH, Kaiser R, Sullivan RN, et al. LUME-Lung 2 Study group. Nintedanib plus pemetrexed versus placebo plus pemetrexed in patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 2): A randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. Lung Cancer. 2016;102:65–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• du Bois A, Kristensen G, Ray-Coquard I, et al. Standard first-line chemotherapy with or without nintedanib for advanced ovarian cancer (AGO-OVAR 12): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:78–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reck M, Kaiser R, Eschbach C, et al. A phase II double-blind study to investigate efficacy and safety of two doses of the triple angiokinase inhibitor BIBF 1120 in patients with relapsed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(6):1374–1381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledermann JA, Hackshaw A, Kaye S, et al. Randomized phase II placebo-controlled trial of maintenance therapy using the oral triple angiokinase inhibitor BIBF 1120 after chemotherapy for relapsed ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(28):3798–3804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nintedanib and capecitabine in treating patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. [cited 2017 Jun 15]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02393755.
   Google Scholar
• Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2335–2342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltz LB, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(12):2013–2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern cooperative oncology group study E3200. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(12):1539–1544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, et al. Effect of first-line chemotherapy combined with cetuximab or bevacizumab on overall survival in patients with KRAS wild type advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2017;317(23):2392–2401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stintzing S, Modest DP, Rossius L, et al. FIRE-3 investigators. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cáncer (FIRE-3): a post-hoc analysis of tumour dynamics in the final RAS wild-type subgroup of this randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(10):1426–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartzberg LS, Rivera F, Karthaus M, et al. PEAK: a randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(21):2240–2247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holch JW, Ricard I, Stintzing S, et al. The relevance of primary tumour location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of first-line clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2017;70:87–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Cutsem E, Tabernero J, Lakomy R, et al. Addition of aflibercept to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan improves survival in a phase III randomized trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(28):3499–3506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D, et al. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(1):29–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabernero J, Yoshino T, Cohn AL, et al. Ramucirumab versus placebo in combination with second-line FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that progressed during or after first-line therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine (RAISE): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(5):499–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm SM, Dumas J, Adnane L, et al. Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506): a new oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases with potent preclinical antitumor activity. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(1):245–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Cutsem E, Ciardiello F, Grothey A, et al. Results from the large, open-label phase 3b CONSIGN study of regorafenib in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cAncer. Annals of Oncology. 2015;26(suppl_4):117–122. DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdv262.
   Google Scholar
• Capdevila J, Carrato A, Tabernero J, et al. What could Nintedanib (BIBF 1120), a triple inhibitor of VEGFR, PDGFR, and FGFR, add to the current treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;92(2):83–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehringer Ingelheim. Vargatef_(nintedanib) summary of product characteristics (2014). Available from: www.ema.europa.eu [Last accessed 2017 Jan]
   Google Scholar
• Roth GJ, Binder R, Colbatzky F, et al. Nintedanib: from discovery to the clinic. J Med Chem. 2015;58(3):1053–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilberg F, Roth GJ, Krssak M, et al. BIBF 1120: triple angiokinase inhibitor with sustained receptor blockade and good antitumor efficacy. Cancer Res. 2008;68(12):4774–4782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenik BK, Ostapoff KT, Gerber DE, et al. BIBF 1120 (nintedanib), a triple angiokinase inhibitor, induces hypoxia but not EMT and blocks progression of preclinical models of lung and pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(6):992–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stopfer P, Roth W, Mross K, et al. Pharmacokinetic characterization of BIBF 1120, an orally active triple angiokinase inhibitor (VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR) in advanced cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Suppl. 2006;4(13):26Abstract 73.
   Google Scholar
• Stopfer P, Rathgen K, Bischoff D, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of BIBF 1120 after oral dosing to healthy male volunteers. Xenobiotica. 2011;41(4):297–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mross K, Stefanic M, Gmehling D, et al. Phase I study of the angiogenesis inhibitor BIBF 1120 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:311–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mross K, Büchert M, Frost A, et al. Vascular effects, efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer: a prospective phase I subanalysis. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto I, Kaneda H, Satoh T, et al. Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and biomarker study of BIBF 1120, an oral triple tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9:2825–2833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropff M, Kienast J, Bisping G, et al. An open-label dose-escalation study of BIBF 1120 in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(10):4233–4238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doebele RC, Conkling P, Traynor AM, et al. A phase I, open-label dose-escalation study of continuous treatment with BIBF 1120 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2094–2102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis PM, Kaiser R, Zhao Y, et al. Phase I open-label study of continuous treatment with BIBF 1120, a triple angiokinase Inhibitor, and pemetrexed in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(10):2881–2889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousquet G, Alexandre J, Le Tourneau C, et al. Phase I study of BIBF 1120 with docetaxel and prednisone in metastatic chemo-naive hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(11):1640–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Bois A, Huober J, Stopfer P, et al. A phase I open-label dose-escalation study of oral BIBF 1120 combined with standard paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced gynecological malignancies. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(2):370–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay P, Fakih M, Attwood K, et al. A phase I/II study of nintedanib and capecitabine in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl 4S; abstract 759). Available from:  http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.4_suppl.759
   Google Scholar
• Bouche O, Maindrault-Goebel F, Ducreux M, et al. Phase II trial of weekly alternating sequential BIBF 1120 and afatinib for advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2011;31(6):2271–2281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Cutsem E, Prenen H, D’Haens G, et al. A phase I/II, open-label, randomised study of nintedanib plusmFOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:2085–2091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz H-J, Tabernero J, Yoshino T, et al. Nintedanib (N) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC for the treatment of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies: health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results of the Phase III LUME-Colon 1 study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl4S):abstract671.
   Google Scholar
• Casanovas O, Hicklin DJ, Bergers G, et al. Drug resistance by evasion of antiangiogenic targeting of VEGF signaling in late-stage pancreatic islet tumors. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopetz S, Hoff PM, Morris JS, et al. Phase II trial of infusional fluorouracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: efficacy and circulating angiogenic biomarkers associated with therapeutic resistance. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(3):453–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koeberle D, Betticher DC, Von Moos R, et al. Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial (SAKK 41/06). Ann Oncol. 2015;26(4):709–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocenti F, Ou FS, Zemla T, et al. Somatic DNA mutations, MSI status, mutational load (ML): association with overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) of CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl; abstr 3504). Available from: http://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.3504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz HJ, Ou FS, Venook AP, et al. Impact of consensus molecular subtyping (CMS) on overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): analysis of CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl; abstr 3511). Available from: http://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.3511
   Google Scholar
• Stintzing S, Wirapati P, Lenz HJ, et al. Consensus molecular subgroups (CMS) of colorectal cancer (CRC) and first-line efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab in the FIRE3 (AIO KRK-0306) trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl; abstr 3510). Available from: http://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.3510
   Google Scholar