Exocyclic DNA adducts and oxidative stress parameters: useful tools for biomonitoring exposure to aldehydes in smokers

References

• Alamil H, Lechevrel M, Lagadu S, Galanti L, Dagher Z, Delépée R. 2020. A validated UHPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of 9 exocyclic DNA adducts induced by 8 aldehydes. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 179:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.113007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alamil H, Galanti L, Heutte N, Van Der Schueren M, Dagher Z, Lechevrel M. 2020. Genotoxicity of aldehyde mixtures: profile of exocyclic DNA-adducts as a biomarker of exposure to tobacco smoke. Toxicol Lett. 331(May):57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.05.010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altomare A, Baron G, Gianazza E, Banfi C, Carini M, Aldini G. 2021. Lipid peroxidation derived reactive carbonyl species in free and conjugated forms as an index of lipid peroxidation: limits and perspectives. Redox Biol. Elsevier B.V., 42:101899. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose JA, Barua RS. 2004. The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: an update. J Am Coll Cardiol. Elsevier Masson SAS, 43(10):1731–1737. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andries A, Rozenski J, Vermeersch P, Mekahli D, Van Schepdael A. 2021. Recent progress in the LC–MS/MS analysis of oxidative stress biomarkers. Electrophoresis. 42(4):402–428. doi: 10.1002/elps.202000208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragno M, Mastrocola R. 2017. Dietary sugars and endogenous formation of advanced glycation endproducts: emerging mechanisms of disease. 9(4):385. doi: 10.3390/nu9040385
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch H, Nair UJ. 2014. Lipid peroxidation–derived DNA adducts and the role in inflammation-related carcinogenesis. In Cancer and inflammation mechanisms. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; p. 61–74. doi: 10.1002/9781118826621.ch5
   Google Scholar
• Benowitz NL. 2003. Cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology and implications for treatment. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 46(1):91–111. doi: 10.1016/S0033-0620(03)00087-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadet J, Davies KJA, Medeiros MH, Di Mascio P, Wagner JR. 2017. Formation and repair of oxidatively generated damage in cellular DNA. Free Radic Biol Med. Elsevier, 107:13–34. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.12.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson H, Törnqvist M. 2017. An adductomic approach to identify electrophiles in vivo. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 121 Suppl 3(S3):44–54. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12715
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carnevale R, Sciarretta S, Violi F, Nocella C, Loffredo L, Perri L, Peruzzi M, Marullo AGM, De Falco E, Chimenti I, et al. 2016. Acute impact of tobacco vs electronic cigarette smoking on oxidative stress and vascular function. Chest. Elsevier Inc, 150(3):606–612. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale R, Cammisotto V, Pagano F, Nocella C. 2018. ‘Effects of Smoking on Oxidative Stress and Vascular Function’, In Smoking prevention and cessation, pp. 25–47. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-biometric-technologies/liveness-detection-in-biometrics.
   Google Scholar
• Charão MF, Moro AM, Valentini J, Brucker N, Bubols GB, Bulcão RP, Baierle M, Freitas FA, Nascimento SN, Barth A, et al. 2014. Exogenous and endogenous antioxidants attenuate the lipid peroxidation in workers occupationally exposed to paints. Drug Chem Toxicol. 37(1):69–75. doi: 10.3109/01480545.2013.806534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchwell MI, Beland FA, Doerge DR. 2002. Quantification of multiple DNA adducts formed through oxidative stress using liquid chromatography and electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Chem Res Toxicol. 15(10):1295–1301. doi: 10.1021/tx0101595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colsoul M, Goderniaux N, Vanpee D, Galanti L. 2020. Development and validation of a quantification method of cotinine in urine using two innovative technologies : supported liquid extraction and QDa detection. J Diagn Tech Biomed Anal. 9(1):1000142. doi: 10.37532/jdtba.2020.9(1).142.
   Google Scholar
• Dator RP, Solivio MJ, Villalta PW, Balbo S. 2019. Bioanalytical and mass spectrometric methods for aldehyde profiling in biological fluids. Toxics. 7(2):1–35. doi: 10.3390/TOXICS7020032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deveci SE, Deveci F, Açik Y, Ozan AT. 2004. The measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide in healthy smokers and non-smokers. Respir Med. 98(6):551–556. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujioka K, Shibamoto T. 2006. Determination of toxic carbonyl compounds in cigarette smoke. Far East Entomol. 16(1):47–54. doi: 10.1002/tox
   Google Scholar
• Haleng J, Pincemail J, Defraigne JO, Charlier C, Chapelle JP. 2007. Le stress oxydant. Rev Med Liege. 62(10):628–638. doi: 10.1016/j.immbio.2006.02.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hecht SS. 2016. Oral cell DNA adducts as potential biomarkers for lung cancer susceptibility in cigarette smokers. Chem Res Toxicol. 30(1):367–375. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hikisz P, Jacenik D. 2023. The tobacco smoke component, acrolein, as a major culprit in lung diseases and respiratory cancers: molecular mechanisms of acrolein cytotoxic activity. Cells. 12(6):879. doi: 10.3390/cells12060879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes K, Lee BL, Feng X, Lee J, Ong C-N. 2002. Coenzyme Q10 and differences in coronary heart disease risk in Asian Indians and Chinese. Free Radic Biol Med. 32(2):132–138. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00783-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IARC. 1986. IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans: tobacco smoking. Lyon: Secretariat of the World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• IARC Monograph. 2021. Acrolein, crotonaldehyde, and arecoline. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 128.
   Google Scholar
• Karademirci M, Kutlu R, Kilinc I. 2018. Relationship between smoking and total antioxidant status, total oxidant status, oxidative stress index, vit C, vit E. Clin Respir J. 12(6):2006–2012. doi: 10.1111/crj.12757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S. 2016. Overview of cotinine cutoff values for smoking status classification. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 13(12):1236. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13121236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee B-J, Lin Y-C, Huang Y-C, Ko Y-W, Hsia S, Lin P-T. 2012. The relationship between coenzyme Q10, oxidative stress, and antioxidant enzymes activities and coronary artery disease. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012:1–8. doi: 10.1100/2012/792756
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Liu L, Wang H, Chen J, Zhu B, Chen H, Hou H, Hu Q. 2017. Simultaneous analysis of six aldehyde-DNA adducts in salivary DNA of nonsmokers and smokers using stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. Elsevier, 1060(December 2016):451–459. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.06.031
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lonkar P, Dedon PC. 2011. Reactive species and DNA damage in chronic inflammation: reconciling chemical mechanisms and biological fates. Int J Cancer. 128(9):1999–2009. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma B, Stepanov I, Hecht SS. 2019. Recent studies on DNA adducts resulting from human exposure to tobacco smoke. Toxics. 7(1):16. doi: 10.3390/toxics7010016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros MHG. 2019. DNA damage by endogenous and exogenous aldehydes. J Braz Chem Soc. 30(10):2000–2009. doi: 10.21577/0103-5053.20190056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olubukola Sinbad O, Folorunsho AA, Olabisi OL, Abimbola Ayoola O, Johnson Temitope E. 2019. Vitamins as antioxidants. J Food Sci Nutr Res. 02(03):214–235. doi: 10.26502/jfsnr.2642-11000021
   Google Scholar
• Paci E, Pigini D, Bauleo L, Ancona C, Forastiere F, Tranfo G. 2018. Urinary cotinine concentration and self-reported smoking status in 1075 subjects living in Central Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15(4):804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings JLA, Cremers JWJM, Becker MJA, Klerx WNM, Talhout R. 2020. Aldehyde and volatile organic compound yields in commercial cigarette mainstream smoke are mutually related and depend on the sugar and humectant content in tobacco. Nicotine Tob Res. 22(10):1748–1756. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincemail J, Bonjean K, Cayeux K, Defraigne J-O. 2002. Physiological action of antioxidant defences. Nutrition Clinique et Metabolisme. 16(4):233–239. doi: 10.1016/S0985-0562(02)00166-8
   Google Scholar
• Prasad BS, Vidyullatha P, Venkata RP, Tirumala VG, Varre S, Penagaluru UR, Grover P, Mundluru HP, Penagaluru PR. 2013. Evaluation of oxidative stress and DNA damage in traffic policemen exposed to vehicle exhaust. Biomarkers. 18(5):406–411. doi: 10.3109/1354750X.2013.801517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saieva C, Peluso M, Palli D, Cellai F, Ceroti M, Selvi V, Bendinelli B, Assedi M, Munnia A, Masala G, et al. 2016. Dietary and lifestyle determinants of malondialdehyde DNA adducts in a representative sample of the Florence City population. Mutagenesis. 31(4):475–480. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gew012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salahuddin S, Prabhakaran D, Roy A. 2012. Pathophysiological mechanisms of tobacco-related CVD. Glob Heart. World Heart Federation (Geneva), 7(2):113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2012.05.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sampson MM, Chambers DM, Pazo DY, Moliere F, Blount BC, Watson CH. 2014. Simultaneous analysis of 22 volatile organic compounds in cigarette smoke using gas sampling bags for high-throughput solid-phase microextraction. Anal Chem. 86(14):7088–7095. doi: 10.1021/ac5015518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Sandhu J, Kaur B, Juren T, Steward WP, Segerbäck D, Farmer PB. 2009. Evaluation of the DNA damaging potential of cannabis cigarette smoke by the determination of acetaldehyde derived N2-ethyl-2′- deoxyguanosine adducts. Chem Res Toxicol. 22(6) :1181–1188. doi: 10.1021/tx900106y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukder MAH, Johnson WM, Varadharaj S, Lian J, Kearns PN, El-Mahdy MA, Liu X, Zweier JL. 2011. Chronic cigarette smoking causes hypertension, increased oxidative stress, impaired NO bioavailability, endothelial dysfunction, and cardiac remodeling in mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 300(1):H388–H396. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00868.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweed JO, Hsia SH, Lutfy K, Friedman TC. 2012. The endocrine effects of nicotine and cigarette smoke. Trends Endocrinol Metab. Elsevier Ltd, 23(7):334–342. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2012.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voulgaridou G-P, Anestopoulos I, Franco R, Panayiotidis MI, Pappa A. 2011. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis DNA damage induced by endogenous aldehydes : current state of knowledge. Mutat Res. Elsevier B.V. 711(1-2):13–27. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng M-w, Lee H-W, Park S-H, Hu Y, Wang H-T, Chen L-C, Rom WN, Huang WC, Lepor H, Wu X-R, et al. 2018. Aldehydes are the predominant forces inducing DNA damage and inhibiting DNA repair in tobacco smoke carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 115(27):E6152–E6161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804869115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie M-Z, Shoulkamy MI, Salem AMH, Oba S, Goda M, Nakano T, Ide H. 2016. Aldehydes with high and low toxicities inactivate cells by damaging distinct cellular targets. Mutat Res. Elsevier B.V. 786:41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2016.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Balbo S, Villalta PW, Hecht SS. 2019. Analysis of acrolein-derived 1. N2-propanodeoxyguanosine adducts in human lung DNA from smokers and non-smokers. Chem Res Toxicol. 32(2):318–325. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00326
   Google Scholar