Managing in the interprofessional environment: a theory of action perspective

References

• ABRAMSON, J.S. & MIZRAHI, T. (1996). When social workers and physicians collaborate: positive and negative interdisciplinary experiences. Social Work, 41(3), 270–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARGYRIS, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 363–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARGYRIS, C. (1977). Double-loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55(5), 115–125. ARGYRIS, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning and action: individual and organizational. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• ARGYRIS, C. (1983). Action science and intervention. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19(2), 115–140. ARGYRIS, C. (1985). Making knowledge more relevant to practice: maps for action. In: E.E. LAWLER III, A.M. MOHRMAN JR, S.A. MOHRMAN, G.E. LEDFORD JR, T.G. CUMMINGS & ASSOCIATES (Eds), Doing research that is useful for theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• ARGYRIS, C. (1990). Overcoming organizational defenses: facilitating organizational learning. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• ARGYRIS, C. (1993). Knowledge for action: a guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• ARGYRIS, C. (1994). Good communication that blocks learning. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARGYRIS, C. (1997). Learning and Teaching: a theory of action perspective. Journal of Management Education, 21(1), 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• ARGYRIS, C. (2000). Flawed advice and the management trap: how managers can know when they’re getting good advice and when they’re not. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ARGYRIS, C. & SCHO¨ N, D.A. (1974). Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ARGYRIS, C. & SCHO¨ N, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• ARGYRIS, C. & SCHO¨ N, D.A. (1996). Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• ATWAL, A. (2001). Structure, aim and constraints of interprofessional working. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 8(10), 366–370.
   Google Scholar
• ATWAL, A. & CALDWELL, K. (2002). Do multidisciplinary integrated care pathways improve interprofessional collaboration? Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 16(4), 360–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BASSOFF, B.Z. & LUDWIG, S. (1979). Interdisciplinary education for healthcare professionals. Health and Social Work, 4(2), 58–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BURKE, D., HERRMAN, H., COCKRAM, M. & TRAUER, T. (2000). Educational aims and objectives for working in multidisciplinary teams. Australasian Psychiatry, 8(4), 336–339.
   Google Scholar
• BURNS, C. (1994). Innovative team building: synergistic human resource development. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 22(1), 1994.
   Google Scholar
• DOCKRELL, J. & WILSON, G. (1995). Management issues in interprofessional work with older people. In: K. SOOTHILL, L. MACKAY & C. WEBB (Eds), Interprofessional relations in health care (pp. 281–296). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• ELSTON, S. & HOLLOWAY, I. (2001). The impact of recent primary care reforms in the UK on interprofessional working in primary care centres. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15(1), 19–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FREEMAN, M., ROSS, N. (2000). The impact of individual philosophies of teamwork on multi-professional practice and the implications for education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 14(3), 237–247.
   Google Scholar
• FREETH, D. (2001). Sustaining interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15 (1),37–46. GOLDSTEIN, H. (1998). Education for ethical dilemmas in social work practice. Families in Society, 79 (3),241–253. HALL, P.& WEAVER, L. (2001). Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: a long and winding road. Medical Education, 35, 867–875.
   Google Scholar
• ELWYNJONES ,RAPPORT, F. & KINNERSLEY, P.(1998). Primary health care teams re-engineered. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 12(2), 189–198.
   Google Scholar
• LANKSHEAR, A.J. (2003). Coping with conflict and confusing agendas in multidisciplinary community mental health teams. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 10, 457–464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LUNTZ, J. (1985). Some problems of being a professional on a team. Australian Social Work, 38(4), 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• MACKAY, L., SOOTHILL, K. & WEBB, C. (1995). Troubled times: the context for interprofessional collaboration? In: K. SOOTHILL, L. MACKAY & C. WEBB (Eds), Interprofessional relations in health care (pp. 5–10). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• MAILICK, M.D. & ASHLEY, A.A. (1981). Politics of interprofessional collaboration: challenge to advocacy. The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, (March), 131–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MARIANO, C. (1989). The case for interdisciplinary collaboration. Nursing Outlook, 37 (6),285–288. MARTIN, V. (2000). Managing value conflicts. Nursing Management, 7(5), 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• MCCOWN, R.L. (2001). Learning to bridge the gap between science-based decision support and the practice of farming: evolution in paradigms of model-based research and intervention from design to dialogue. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52, 549–571.
   Google Scholar
• MICKAN, S. & RODGER, S. (2000). Charateristics of effective teams: a literature review. Australian Health Review, 23(3), 201–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ØVRETVEIT, J. (1997). How to describe interprofessional working. In: J. ØVRETVEIT, P. MATHIAS & T. THOMPSON (Eds), Interprofessional working for health and social care. Houndsmills: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• REASON, P. (1991). Power and conflict in multidisciplinary collaboration. Complementary Medical Research, 3(3), 144–150.
   Google Scholar
• SCHO¨ N, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• SCHO¨ N, (1992). The crisis of professional knowledge and the pursuit of an epistemology of practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 6(1), 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• SCHO¨ N, D.A. (1995). Causality and causal inference in the study of organizations. In: R.F. GOODMAN & W.R. FISHER (Eds), Rethinking knowledge: reflections across the disciplines (pp. 69–101). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• SCHO¨ N, D.A. & REIN, M. (1994). Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• SKØRSHAMMER, M. (2001). Co-operation and conflict in a hospital: interprofessional differences in perception and management of conflicts. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15(1), 7–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SMITH, D.M. (1992). Different portraits of medical practice: model conflict in training physicians to ‘‘think family’’. In
   Google Scholar
• R.J. SAWA (Ed), Family health care (pp. 105–130). Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• WHITTINGTON, C. & BELL, L. (2001). Learning for interprofessional and inter-agency practice in the new social work curriculum: evidence from an earlier research study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15(2), 153–169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO STUDY GROUP ON MULTIPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION OF HEALTH PERSONNEL. (1988). The team approach: learning together to work together for health (Technical Report Series 769). Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• WOOD, D.F. (2001). Editorial: Interprofessional education–still more questions than answers? Medical Education, 35, 816–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar