Variation in views on clients in interprofessional work for vocational rehabilitation in Sweden

References

• Act of financial co-ordination regarding rehabilitational measures. (2004). SFS 2004:793.
   Google Scholar
• Alexanderson, K., & Norlund, A. (Eds) (2004). Sickness absence – causes, consequences, and physicians' sickness certification practice. A systematic literature review by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health: Supplementum, 32(63), 1 – 263
   Google Scholar
• Barnard A., McCosker H., Gerber R. Phenomenography: A qualitative research approach for exploring understanding in health care. Qualitative Health Research 1999; 9: 212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batalden P. B., Cronenwett L. R., Brown L. L., Moffatt C., Serrell N. P. Collaboration in improving care for patients: How can we find out what we haven't been able to figure out yet?. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 1998; 24(10)609–618
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batalden P. B., Nelson E. C., Mohr J. J., Godfrey M. M., Huber T. P., Kosnik L., Ashling K. Microsystems in health care: Part 5. How leaders are leading. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety 2003; 29: 297–308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bate P. Changing the culture of a hospital: From hierarchy to networked community. Public Administration Review 2000; 78: 485–512
   Google Scholar
• Berwick D. M. My right knee. Annals of Internal Medicine 2005; 142: 121–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cody K. W. Paternalism in nursing and health care: Central issues and their relation to theory. Nursing Science Quarterly 2003; 16: 288–296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper H., Spencer-Dawe E. Involving service users in interprofessional education narrowing the gap between theory and practise. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2006; 20: 603–617
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back. British Medical Journal 1999; 319: 719–720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glouberman S., Mintzberg H. Managing the care of health and cure of disease – Part II. Health Care Management Review 2001; 26: 70–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey M. M., Nelson E. C., Wasson J. H., Mohr J. J., Batalden P. B. Microsystems in health care: Part 3. Planning patient-centered services. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety 2003; 29: 159–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goine H. Sickness absence- aspects of measurement, impact of the labour market and effects of intervention. Sundsvall 2006, [Dissertation] Available from: Mid Sweden University; Department of Health Sciences
   Google Scholar
• Hawks D. Section II: Governmental responses to drug use. The new public health: Nanny in a new hat?. Addiction 1997; 92: 1175–1177
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Health and Medical Service Act. (1982). SFS 1982:763.
   Google Scholar
• Holmström I. Gaining professional competence for patient encounters by means of a new understanding. Uppsala University, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Section for Health Services Research. 2002, [Dissertation]
   Google Scholar
• Holmström I. M., Rosenqvist U. Misunderstandings about illness and treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2005; 49: 146–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe A. Can the patient be on our team? An operationational approach to patient involvement in interprofessional approaches to safe care. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2006; 20: 527–534
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudson B. Joint commissioning across the primary health care-social care boundary: Can it work?. Health & Social Care in the Community 1999; 7: 358–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm, a new health system for the 21st century5th edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 2004
   Google Scholar
• Kendall E., Buys N., Larner J. Community-based service delivery in rehabilitation: The promise and the paradox. Disability & Rehabilitation 2000; 22: 435–445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosnik L. K., Espinosa J. A. Microsystems in health care: Part 7. The microsystem as a platform for merging strategic planning and operations. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and safety 2003; 29: 452–459
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson J., Holmström I., Rosenqvist U. Professional artist, good Samaritan, servant and co-ordinator: Four ways of understanding the anaesthetist's work. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2003; 47: 787–793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist R., Grape O. Vocational rehabilitation of the socially disadvantaged long-term sick: Inter-organizational co-operation between welfare state agencies. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 1999; 27: 5–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundborg C. S., Wahlström R., Dall'Alba G. Ways of experiencing asthma management. Variations among general practitioners in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 1999; 17: 226–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton F. Phenomenography – a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought 1986; 21: 29–49
   Google Scholar
• Marton F., Booth S. Learning and awareness. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 1997
   Google Scholar
• McGregor D. The human side of enterprise. Penguin Books Ltd., Middlesex 1987, Reprinted
   Google Scholar
• Morath J. Changing the healthcare culture: The consumer as a part of the system of care. Health Services Management 2003; 19: 17–28
   Google Scholar
• Morgan G. Images of organizationThe executive edition. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco 1998
   Google Scholar
• National Social Insurance Board & Board of Health and Welfare. SOCSAM – an experiment with political and financial co-ordination. A final report. Finansiell samordning, Stockholm 2001; 1, [in Swedish]
   Google Scholar
• Nelson E. C., Batalden P. B., Huber T. P., Mohr J. J., Godfrey M. M., Headrick L. A., Wasson J. H. Microsystems in health care: Part 1. Learning from high-performing front-line clinical units. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety 2002; 28: 472–493
   Google Scholar
• Page S. Entrepreneurial strategies for managing interagency collaboration. Journal of public Administration Research and Theory 2003; 13: 311–340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein B. The social democratic state: the Swedish model and the bureaucratic problem of social reform. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh 1996
   Google Scholar
• Social Services Act. (2001). SFS 2001:453.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg R. Organisational logic in collaboration – the art of organising collaboration in an imaginary organisation of public actors. Stockholm 2000, [Dissertation] (in Swedish) Available from: Stockholm University, Psychological Institution
   Google Scholar
• Taylor S. Quandary at the crossroads: Paternalism versus advocacy surrounding end-of-treatment decisions. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care July/August, 1995; 43–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor S. G., Pickens J. M., Geden E. A. Interactional styles of nurse practitioners and physicians regarding patient decision making. Nursing Research 1989; 38: 50–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar