An integrated approach of gravity modelling and spatial planning: the example of US megaregions

Literature

• Barnett, J. 2020. Designing the Megaregion Meeting Urban Challenges at a New Scale. Washington: Islandpress.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, C., and M. Pastor. 2011. “Moving On Up? Regions, Megaregions, and the Changing Geography of Social Equity Organizing.” Urban Affairs Review 47 (3): 315–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087410391950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budó, Á. 1970. Experimental Physics I. Budapest: National Textbook Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, H. C. 1858. Principles of Social Science. New York: J.B. Lippincott & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, P. D. 1949. “New Laws of Retail Gravitation.” Journal of Marketing 14 (3): 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224295001400303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csomós, G., and G. Tóth. 2016. “Modelling the Shifting Command and Control Function of Cities Through a Gravity Model Based Bidimensional Regression Analysis.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (4): 613–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15621632.
   Google Scholar
• Dewar, M., and D. Epstein. 2007. “Planning for “Megaregions” in the United States.” Journal of Planning Literature 22 (2): 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412207306615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, S. G. 1950. “The Interactance Hypothesis.” A Gravity Model Fitting Physical Masses and Human Groups American Sociological Review 15 (2): 245–256.
   Google Scholar
• Dusek, T. 2003. “A gravitációs modell és a gravitációs törvény összehasonlítása.” Tér és Társadalom 17 (1): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.17.1.873.
   Google Scholar
• Dusek, T. 2012. “Bidimensional Regression in Spatial Analysis.” Regional Statistics 2 (1): 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., and B. Waterhout. 2002. The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective – No Masterplan. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Filippo, S., A. Maritan, and Z. Néda. 2012. Continuum Approach for a Class of Mobility Models [physics.soc-ph] Jun 19, 2012, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.4359.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R., T. Gulden, and C. Mellander. 2008. “The Rise of the Mega-Region.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1 (3): 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, A., and B. Kohler. 2003. “Bidimensional Regression: Assessing the Configural Similarity and Accuracy of Cognitive Maps and Other Two-Dimensional Data Sets.” Psychological Methods 8 (4): 468–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, R. J. 1994. Mega-city Growth and the Future. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glocker, D. 2018. The Rise of Megaregions: Delineating a new Scale of Economic Geography OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2018/04, OECD: Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Gottmann, J. 1964. Megalopolis. The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagler, Y. 2009. Defining U.S. Megaregions Regional Plan Association/America 2050, New York. https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rpa-org/pdfs/2050-Paper-Defining-US-Megaregions.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, C., and F. C. Ikle. 1957. “Intercity Telephone and Airline Traffic Related to Distance and the Propensity to.” Interact Sociometry 20 (4): 306–316.
   Google Scholar
• Hara, Y., K. Takeuchi, and S. Okubo. 2005. “Urbanization Linked with Past Agricultural Landuse Patterns in the Urban Fringe of a Deltaic Asian Mega-City: A Case Study in Bangkok.” Landscape and Urban Planning 73 (1): 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., and H. Gu. 2023. “Arguing with Megaregions: Learning from China’s Chéngshì qún.” Transactions in Planning and Urban Research 2 (1): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/27541223231157239.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., and M. Hoyler. 2015. “Megaregions Reconsidered: Urban Futures and the Future of the Urban.” In Megaregions Globalization’s New Urban Form?, edited by J. Harrison, and M. Hoyler, 230–256. Cheltenham, UK: EdwardElgar.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, K. E., and A. S. Fotheringham. 1985. Gravity and Spatial Interaction Models Reprint. Edited by Thrall, G. Y. WVU Research Repository. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Heidari, H., M. Arabi, T. Warziniack, and S.-C. Kao. 2021. “Shifts in Hydroclimatology of US Megaregions in Response to Climate Change.” Environmental Research Communications 3: 065002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac0617.
   Google Scholar
• Hospers, G.-J. 2003. “Beyond the Blue Banana? Structural Change in Europe’s Geo-Economy.” Intereconomics 38 (2): 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kincses, Á, Z. Nagy, and G. Tóth. 2014a. “The Changing Economic Spatial Structure of Europe.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 68 (5): 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2014.963665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincses, Á, Z. Nagy, and G. Tóth. 2014b. “Modelling the Spatial Structure of Europe.” Regional Statistics 4 (2): 40–54. https://doi.org/10.15196/RS04203.
   Google Scholar
• Kincses, Á, and G. Tóth. 2014. “The Application of Gravity Model in the Investigation of Spatial Structure.” Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 11 (2): 5–19. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.11.02.2014.02.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocziszky, G., Z. Nagy, G. Tóth, and L. Dávid. 2015. “New Method for Analysing the Spatial Structure of Europe.” Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies And Research 3: 143–160.
   Google Scholar
• Kotkin, J., and M. Schill. 2013. A Map Of America's Future: Where Growth Will Be Over The Next Decade https://www.newgeography.com/content/003914-a-map-of-americas-future-where-growth-will-be-over-the-next-decade(downloaded: March 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Kurowska, K., H. Kryszk, and E. Kietlinska. 2017. “The Use of Gravity Model in Spatial Planning.” Environmental Engineering 10th International Conference Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Lithuania, 27–28 April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R. E., and D. Dhavale. 2004. Micropolitan America: A Brand New Geography. Blacksburg, Virginia: Geography Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R. E., and D. Dhavale. 2005. Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring America’s New “Megapolitan”. Blacksburg, Virginia: Geography Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech.
   Google Scholar
• Liangyong, W. 1997. “The Need for the Study of Mega-Cities and Mega-City Regions in Asia.” Ekistics 64 (385-387): 166–167.
   Google Scholar
• Mate, G., Z. Neda, and J. Benedek. 2011. “Spring-Block Model Reveals Region-Like Structures.” PLoS ONE 6 (2): e16518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E. J., and M. J. Burger. 2010. “Spatial Structure and Productivity in US Metropolitan Areas.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42 (6): 1383–1402. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. D., and A. Rae. 2016. “An Economic Geography of the United States: From Commutes to Megaregions.” PLoS ONE 11 (11): e0166083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, I. 1688. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, I., N. Reid, and H. Campbell. 2020. “The Changing Industrial Organization of American Megaregions.” In Urban Empires. Cities as Global Rulers in the New Urban World, edited by E. Glaeser, K. Kourtit, and P. Nijkamp. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E., F. Sielker, and D. Stead. 2022. “Soft Planning in Macro-Regions and Megaregions: Creating Toothless Spatial Imaginaries or new Forces for Change?” International Planning Studies 27 (2): 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1972796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regional Plan Association. 2006. America 2050: A Prospectus. New York: Regional Plan Association.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, W. J. 1929. Methods for the Study of Retail Relationships University of Texas Bulletin, No. 2944, Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. 2008. Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for U.S. Atlanta: Infrastructure Investment and Transportation Planning Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. (ed) 2009. Megaregions: Planning for Global Competitiveness Washington. London: Islandpress, Covelon.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C., M. Woo, and F. Wang. 2016. “Megaregions and Regional Sustainability.” International Journal of Urban Sciences 20 (3): 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2016.1189846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, F. F. 1934. “Sampling Errors and Interpretations of Social Data Ordered in Time and Space.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 165–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1934.10506245.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. Q. 1947. “Empirical Mathematical Rules Concerning the Distribution and Equilibrium of Population.” Geographical Review 37 (3): 461–485. https://doi.org/10.2307/211132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1961. “Map Transformations of Geographic Space.” (PhD Dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1965. “Computation of the Correspondence of Geographical Patterns.” Papers of the Regional Science Association 15 (1): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01947869.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1970. “A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region.” Economic Geography 46 (2): 234–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/143141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1978. “Comparisons of Plane Forms.” Geographical Analysis 10 (2): 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1978.tb00004.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1994. “Bidimensional Regression.” Geographical Analysis 26 (3): 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1994.tb00320.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóth, G., Á Kincses, and Z. Nagy. 2014. European Spatial Structure. Saarbrücken: LAP - Lambert Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. M. 2015. “Five Reasons Why Megaregional Planning Works Against Sustainability.” In Megaregions: Globalization’s New Urban Form?, edited by J. Harrison, and M. Hoyler. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. 1949. Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley Press.
   Google Scholar