Boundary spanning in design-led strategic spatial planning: lessons from post-Sandy rebuilding efforts

References

• Ancona, D. G., and D. F. Caldwell. 1992. “Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 634–665. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angst, M., J. Mewhirter, D. McLaughlin, and M. Fischer. 2022. “Who Joins a Forum—and Who Does Not?—Evaluating Drivers of Forum Participation in Polycentric Governance Systems.” Public Administration Review 82 (4): 692–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balz, V. 2019. “Regional Design: Discretionary Approaches to Planning in the Netherlands.” TU Delft diss.
   Google Scholar
• BIG Group. 2018. “The Big “U”: Rebuild by Design: Promoting Resilience Post-Sandy Through Innovative Planning, Design & Programming". Design Proposal Document. Accessed at https://rebuildbydesign.org/work/proposals/big-u/
   Google Scholar
• Bisker, J., A. Chester, T. Eisenberg, S. Davis, and H. Ovink. 2015. Rebuild by Design. New York, NY: Rebuild by Design.
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. 2002. “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development.” Organization Science 13 (4): 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. 2004. “Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries.” Organization Science 15 (5): 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H. 2005. ““Where has the Future Gone?” Rethinking the Role of Integrated Land-Use Models in Spatial Planning.” Environment and Planning A 37 (8): 1353–1371. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curnin, S., and C. Owen. 2014. “Spanning Organizational Boundaries in Emergency Management.” International Journal of Public Administration 37 (5): 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.830625.
   Google Scholar
• De Jonge, J. M. 2009. Landscape Architecture Between Politics and Science: An Integrative Perspective on Landscape Planning and Design in the Network Society. Wageningen University and Research.
   Google Scholar
• De Zwart, B. A. M. 2015. “Republiek van beelden: de politieke werkingen van het ontwerp in regionale planvorming”. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S. 2007. The Visual Language of Spatial Planning: Exploring Cartographic Representations for Spatial Planning in Europe. The RTPI Library Series, Vol. 7. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2010. “Beyond Lisbon: Soft European Spatial Planning.” disP – The Planning Review 46 (182): 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2010.10557098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2003. “Policy Without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void.” Policy Sciences 36 (2): 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834510939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2017. “De macht van verbeelding. Inaugural lecture.” https://www.uu.nl/sites/default/files/20170320-uu_oratie-hajer.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2006. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for our Times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., A. Khakee, A. Motte, and B. Needham. 1999. “European Developments in Strategic Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies 7 (3): 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319908720522.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, C. 2007. “Making Plans: Representation and Intention.” Planning Theory 6 (1): 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207075148.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, L. D., and G. J. Knaap. 2018. “Autonomous Planning: Using Plans as Signals.” Planning Theory 17 (2): 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216669868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jesiek, B. K., A. Mazzurco, N. T. Buswell, and J. D. Thompson. 2018. “Boundary Spanning and Engineering: A Qualitative Systematic Review.” Journal of Engineering Education 107 (3): 380–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempenaar, A. 2017. Design in the Planning Arena: How Regional Designing Influences Strategic Spatial Planning. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kempenaar, A., N. Laeni, M. van den Brink, T. Busscher, and H. Ovink. 2022. “‘Water as Leverage’: Design-Led Planning for Urban Climate Resilience.” Planning Practice & Research, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2022.2104322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempenaar, A., J. Westerink, M. van Lierop, M. Brinkhuijsen, and A. van den Brink. 2016. ““Design Makes you Understand”—Mapping the Contributions of Designing to Regional Planning and Development.” Landscape and Urban Planning 149:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifer, R., and A. Delbecq. 1978. “Organizational/Environmental Interchange: A Model of Boundary Spanning Activity.” Academy of Management Review 3 (1): 40–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leigh Star, S. 2010. “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology.” & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., J. Mewhirter, and R. Berardo. 2020. “The Origins of Conflict in Polycentric Governance Systems.” Public Administration Review 80 (2): 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., K. Jarenko, K. L. Nilsson, and I. L. Saglie. 2015. “Legitimacy of Informal Strategic Urban Planning—Observations from Finland, Sweden and Norway.” European Planning Studies 23 (2): 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.861808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastop, H., and A. Faludi. 1997. “Evaluation of Strategic Plans: The Performance Principle.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24 (6): 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1068/b240815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijsmans, N.. 2010. Designing for a Region. Amsterdam: SUN Academia.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. H., Ö Bodin, G. S. Cumming, M. Lubell, R. Seppelt, T. Seppelt, and C. M. Weible. 2023. “Building Blocks of Polycentric Governance.” Policy Studies Journal 2023: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., C. M. Tiebout, and R. Warren. 1961. “The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry.” The American Political Science Review 55 (4): 831–842. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovink, Henk, and Jelte Boeijenga. 2018. Too Big: Rebuild by Design: A Transformative Approach to Climate Change. Rotterdam: Nai010 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E. 2016. “When Soft Planning and Hard Planning Meet: Conceptualising the Encounter of European, National and sub-National Planning.” European Journal of Spatial Development 61: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Raaphorst, K. 2019. “More Than Meets the Eye: A Critical Semiotic Analysis of Landscape Design Visualizations.” Doctoral diss., Wageningen University and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Restemeyer, B., M. van den Brink, and J. Woltjer. 2017. “Between Adaptability and the Urge to Control: Making Long-Term Water Policies in the Netherlands.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (5): 920–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1189403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šakić Trogrlić, R., J. Rijke, N. Dolman, and C. Zevenbergen. 2018. “Rebuild by Design in Hoboken: A Design Competition as a Means for Achieving Flood Resilience of Urban Areas Through the Implementation of Green Infrastructure.” Water 10 (5): 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahab, S., T. Hartmann, and A. Jonkman. 2021. “Strategies of Municipal Land Policies: Housing Development in Germany, Belgium, and Netherlands.” European Planning Studies 29 (6): 1132–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1817867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinitz, C. 2012. A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design. Redlands: ESRI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stremke, S., F. Van Kann, and J. Koh. 2012. “Integrated Visions (Part I): Methodological Framework for Long-Term Regional Design.” European Planning Studies 20 (2): 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.650909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. 1996. Planning as Persuasive Storytelling: The Rhetorical Construction of Chicago's Electric Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. 2003. “Planning as Persuasive Storytelling in a Global-Scale web of Relationships.” Planning Theory 2 (2): 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022003.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., and T. J. Scanlan. 1981. “Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and their Antecedents.” Academy of management journal 24 (2): 289–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., J. Edelenbos, A. van den Brink, S. Verweij, R. van Etteger, and T. Busscher. 2019. “To Draw or to Cross the Line? The Landscape Architect as Boundary Spanner in Dutch River Management.” Landscape and Urban Planning 186: 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Valk, A., and A. Faludi. 1997. “The Green Heart and the Dynamics of Doctrine.” Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 12 (1): 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02502623.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. 2011. “Imagining Future Places: How Designs Co-Constitute What is, and Thus Influence What Will be.” Planning Theory 10 (2): 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210386656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. 2021. “What Collaborative Planning Practices Lack and the Design Cycle Can Offer: Back to the Drawing Table.” Planning Theory 20 (1): 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220913073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T., and M. Cook. 2020. “Design Dialogs as a Specific Mode of Communication: About the Ongoing Exploration of Solution Space.” In Design Discourse on Culture and Society, edited by G. Maratovski, and C. Vogel, 121–138. Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hulst, M. 2012. “Storytelling, a Model of and a Model for Planning.” Planning Theory 11 (3): 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212440425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk, I., and J. Edelenbos. 2014. “The Effects of Boundary Spanners on Trust and Performance of Urban Governance Networks: Findings from Survey Research on Urban Development Projects in the Netherlands.” Policy Sciences 47 (1): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9181-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk, I., and J. Edelenbos. 2018. Boundary Spanners in Public Management and Governance: An Interdisciplinary Assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meerkerk, I., and J. Edelenbos. 2020. “Becoming a Competent Boundary Spanning Public Servant.” In The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant, 1–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Von Seggern, H., J. Werner, and L. Grosse-Bächle. 2015. Creating Knowledge: Innovation Strategies for Designing Urban Landscapes. Berlin: Jovis Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Waggonner, D., N. Dolman, D. Hoeferlin, H. Meyer, P. Schengenga, S. Thomaesz, Van Den Bout, J., Van Der Salm, J., and C. Van Der Zwet. 2014. “New Orleans After Katrina: Building America's Water City.” Built Environment 40 (2): 281–299. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.40.2.281.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C., M. Jacuniak-Suda, J. Knieling, and F. Othengrafen. 2012. Soft Spaces in Spatial Planning and Governance: Theoretical Reflections and Definitional Issues. Soft Spaces, Spatial Planning and Territorial Management in Europe. Hamburg: HafenCity University.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, A. 1991. “Coordination: A Problem in Public Sector Management.” Policy & Politics 19 (4): 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557391782454188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2002. “The Competent Boundary Spanner.” Public Administration 80 (1): 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar