Children’s Participation in Child Welfare Decision Making: Recognising Dichotomies, Conceptualising Critically Informed Solutions.

References

• Alderson, P., Hawthorne, J., & Killen, M. (2005). The participation rights of premature babies. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 13(1–2), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1163/1571818054545231
   Google Scholar
• Altmeyer, S. (2018). A theory of recognition as framework for religious education. Reading Axel Honneth from a pedagogical and theological perspective. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 39(4), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2018.1442979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (1995). Translator’s introduction. In A. Honneth (Ed.), The struggle for recognition, x–xx1. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Archard, D., & Skivenes, M. (2009a). Hearing the child. Child and Family Social Work, 14(4), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00606.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archard, D., & Skivenes, M. (2009b). Balancing child’s best interests and child’s views. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 17(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181808X358276
   Google Scholar
• Badham, B., & Davies, T. (2007). Leading and managing work with young people. In R. Harrison, C. Benjamin, S. Curran, & R. Hunter (Eds.), Leading work with young people (pp. 80–97). Open University Reader.
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, A. (2015). Pedagogy of recognition: Winnicott, Honneth and learning in psychosocial spaces. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 5(3), 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsells, MÁ, Fuentes-Peláez, N., & Pastor, C. (2017). Listening to the voices of children in decision-making: A challenge for the child protection system in Spain. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, V. (2012). Social work and advocacy with young people: Rights and care in practice. British Journal of Social Work, 42(7), 1275–1292. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M. (2011). Promoting children’s rights in social work and social care: A guide to participatory practice (Vol. 14). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, B. (2004). On the road to nowhere? Young disabled people and transition. Child: Care, Health and Development, 30(6), 581–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00469.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessell, S. (2011). Participation in decision-making in out-of-home care in Australia: What do young people say? Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 496–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessell, S., & Gal, T. (2009). Forming partnerships: The human rights of children in need of care and protection. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 17(2), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181808X358258
   Google Scholar
• Birmingham Safeguarding Children Board. (2010). Serious case review under article VIII ‘working to safeguard children’ in respect of the death of a child: Case number 14.
   Google Scholar
• Bosisio, R. (2012). Children’s right to be heard: What children think. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 20(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181811X573462
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1992). The logic of practice. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, M., Bailey, S., Belderson, P., & Larsson, B. (2013). Neglect and serious case reviews. University of East Anglia/NSPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, L. (2006). Participation with a purpose. In E. K. M. Tisdall, J. Davis, M. Hill, & A. Prout (Eds.), Children young people and social inclusion: Participation for what? (pp. 217–235) Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore, J., & O’Brien, A. (2001). Facilitating participation of children and young people in care. Children Australia, 26(4), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200010427
   Google Scholar
• Cavet, J., & Sloper, P. (2004). Participation of disabled children in individual decisions about their lives and in public decisions about service development. Children & Society, 18(4), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.803
   Google Scholar
• Cho, M., Rodger, S., Copley, J., & Chien, C. W. (2018). Participation in school-related activities that require hand use for children with and without developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 62(3), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coventry Local Safeguarding Children Board. (2013). Daniel Pelka serious case review. LSGB.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson-Arad, B., Benbenishty, R., Lopez, M., Devaney, J., Spratt, T., Koopmans, C., Knorth, J., Witteman, C., Del Valle, F., & Hayes, D. (2016). Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals’ child welfare attitudes. Child Abuse and Neglect, 49, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S., & Artaraz, K. (2009). Towards an understanding of factors influencing early years professionals’ practice of consultation with young children. Children and Society, 23(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00142.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, C., Pert, H., Aylward, T., Neill, D., & Hill, L. (2020). Barriers children face complaining about social work practice: A study in one English local authority. Child and Family Social Work, 25(2), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, C., Pert, H., & Thomas, N. P. (2019). Independent reviewing officers’ and social workers’ perceptions of children’s participation in children in care reviews. Journal of Children’s Services, 14(3), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-01-2019-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, M., & Kilkelly, U. (2011). Child-friendly healthcare: Delivering on the right to be heard. Medical Law Review, 19(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwq034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, W. (2017). Rethinking misrecognition and struggles for recognition: Critical theory beyond Honneth [Doctoral dissertation]. Department of Philosophy, University of Essex, repository.essex.ac.uk/20460/1/Thesis20-20Deposited%20Version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ezer, T. (2004). A positive right to protection for children. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 7(1), 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2017). What social workers do in performing child protection work: Evidence from research into face-to-face practice. Child and Family Social Work, 21(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, A., & Sloper, P. (2006). Participation of disabled children and young people in decision making within social services departments: A survey of current and recent activities in England. British Journal of Social Work, 36(5), 723–741. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., Smith, M., Hardy, M., & Wilkinson, H. (2012). Children and families’ involvement in social work decision making. Children & Society, 26(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyer, A. (2011). Child-centred foster care. A rights-based model for practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyer, A. (2016). Children’s accounts of moving to a foster home. Child & Family Social Work, 21(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haringey Local Safeguarding Children Board. (2009). Baby Peter serious case review. Haringey LSCB.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S. (2015). When I look I am seen, so I exist to change: Supplementing Honneth’s recognition model for social work. Social Work and Society, 13, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S. (2016). Empowering the ‘shamed’ self: Recognition and critical social work. Journal of Social Work, 16(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017314566789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, S., & Montgomery, L. (2017). Reflecting critically on contemporary social pathologies: Social work and the ‘good life’. Critical and Radical Social Work, 5(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986016X14811848967494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, J. (2011). See the practitioner, see the child: The framework for the assessment of children in need and their families ten years on. British Journal of Social Work, 41(6), 1070–1087. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, M. A. (2013). The participation promise of family group conferencing – Theory or practice? A qualitative comparison study of children’s participation in family group conferences and child protection case conferences’ [Doctoral dissertation]. Queen’s University Belfast. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.602545
   Google Scholar
• Katz, I. (Ed.). (1997). Approaches to empowerment and participation in child protection. John Wiley/NSPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Kennan, D., Brady, B., & Forkan, C. (2016). A systematic literature review: Exploring the effectiveness of structures and procedures intended to support children’s participation in child welfare, child protection and alternative care services. UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Kilkelly, U., & Donnelly, M. (2011). Participation in health care: The views and experiences of children and young people. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 19(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181810X522379
   Google Scholar
• Kilkelly, U., Kilpatrick, R., Lundy, L., Moore, L., Scraton, P., Davey, C., & McAlister, S. (2005). Children’s rights in Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland Commissioner for Children and Young People.
   Google Scholar
• Krappman, L. (2010). The weight of the child’s view (Article 12 of the convention on the rights of the child). The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 18(4), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181810X528021
   Google Scholar
• Laming, H. (2003). The Victoria climbie inquiry report. https://www.gov.uk/ … /the-victoria-climbie-inquiry-report-of-an-inquiry-by-lord-lami
   Google Scholar
• Laming, L. (2009). The protection of children in England: A progress report. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. (2001). Childhood and society: Growing up in an age of uncertainty. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lepold, K. (2019). Examining Honneth’s positive theory of recognition. Critical Horizons, 20(3), 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2019.1644810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article12 of the United Nations Convention on the rights of the child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia, R. C. M., & Vimieiro, A. C. (2015). Recognition and moral progress: A case study about discourses on disability in the media. Political Studies, 63(1), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, G., Winter, K., & Turney, D. (2020). Honneth and positive identity formation in residential care. Child & Family Social Work, 25(4), 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos, A., Vaquero, E., Balsells, M. A., & Ponce, C. (2017). ‘They didn’t tell me anything; they just sent me home’: Children’s participation in the return home. Child & Family Social Work, 22(2), 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty, P. (2017). Implementing Article12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in Child Protection Decision-Making: A Critical Analysis of the Challenges and Opportunities for Social Work. Child Care in Practice, 23(4), 327–341.
   Google Scholar
• McCafferty, P. (2020) “Do I read it? No.” Knowledge utilisation in child welfare decisions. Child Care in Practice. DOI:10.1080/13575279.2020.1765149.
   Google Scholar
• Montserrat, C. (2014). The child protection system from the perspective of young people: Messages from 3 studies. Social Sciences, 3(4), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3040687
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2010). The Munro review of child protection. Part one: A systems analysis. Department for Education. The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011a). The Munro review of child protection. Interim report: The child’s journey. Department for Education. The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011b). The Munro review of child protection. Final report: A child centred system. Department for Education. The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Percy-Smith, B., & Thomas, N. (Eds.). (2010). A handbook of children’s and young people’s participation: Perspectives from theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkney, S. (2011). Participation and emotions: Troubling encounters between children and social welfare professionals. Children and Society, 25(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvortrup, J. (2009). Are children human beings or human becomings? A critical assessment of outcome thinking. Rivista Internazionale Di Scienze Sociali, 117(3/4), 631–653.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. (2014). Helping children is a human process’: Researching the challenges social workers face in communicating with children. British Journal of Social Work, 44(8), 2145–2162. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, R., & Mace, S. (2006). Agency policy and the participation of children and young people in the child protection process. Child Abuse Review, 15(2), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.927
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, G., Moldestad, B., Höjer, I., Ward, E., Skilbred, D., Young, J., & Havik, T. (2011). Managing loss and a threatened identity: Experiences of parents of children growing up in foster care, the perspectives of their social workers and implications for practice. British Journal of Social Work, 41(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemmings, D. (2000). Professionals’ attitudes to children’s participation in decision-making: Dichotomous accounts and doctrinal interests. Child and Family Social Work, 5(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.2000.00160.x
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Cameron, C., & Reimer, D. (2017). From attachment to recognition for children in care. The British Journal of Social Work, 47(6), 1606–1623. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Work Task Force (UK). (2009). Facing up to the task: The interim report of the social work task force. Department of Health and the Department of Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1992). Multiculturalism and ‘the politics of recognition’. Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1995). Philosophical arguments. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, N. (2012). Love, rights and solidarity: Studying children’s participation using Honneth’s theory of recognition. Childhood (Copenhagen, Denmark), 19(4), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568211434604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. (2006). The political theory of recognition: A critical introduction. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Tisdall, E., Davis, J., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Reflecting on children and young people’s participation in the UK. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 16(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181808X311187
   Google Scholar
• Tisdall, E. K. M., & Bell, R. (2006). Included in Governance? Children’s participation in ‘public’ decision-making. In E. K. M. Tisdall, J. Davis, M. Hill, & A. Prout (Eds.), Children, young people and social inclusion: Participation for what? (pp. 105–120). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, D. (2012). A relationship-based approach to engaging involuntary clients: The contribution of recognition theory. Child & Family Social Work, 17(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00830.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2016). Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. CRC/C/GBR/CO/5/Corr.1. United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/856047?ln=en
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. (2009). Guidelines for the alternative care of children. (UN Doc.A/HRC/11?l.13, 2009. https://www.unicef.org/protection/alternative_care_Guidelines-English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uprichard, E. (2008). Children as ‘being and becomings’: Children, childhood and temporality. Children & Society, 22(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00110.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, C., & Ana-Isabel, P. (2018). The relationship between children’s developmental functioning and participation in social activities in Portuguese inclusive preschool settings. Frontiers in Education, 3, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00016
   Google Scholar
• Vis, S. A., Holtran, A., & Thomas, N. (2012). Obstacles for child participation in care and protection cases-why Norwegian social workers find it difficult. Child Abuse Review, 21(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, S. A., Strandbu, A., Holtran, A., & Thomas, N. (2011). Participation and health-A research view of child participation in planning and decision making. Child and Family Social Work, 16(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00743.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, S. A., & Thomas, N. (2009). Beyond talking – Children’s participation in Norwegian care and protection cases. European Journal of Social Work, 12(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450802567465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warming, H. (2015). The life of children in care in Denmark: A struggle over recognition. Childhood (copenhagen, Denmark), 22(2), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568214522838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherall, K., & Duffy, J. (2008). Are we listening to children? An examination of the child’s voice in social work reports to the court following parental separation disputes. Child Care in Practice, 14(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575270802041134
   Google Scholar
• Winter, K. (2009). Relationships matter: The problems the prospects for social workers’ relationships with young children in care. Child and Family Social Work, 14(4), 450–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00628.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, K. (2010). Building relationships and communicating with young children: A practical guide for social workers. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, K. (2011). The UNCRC and social workers’ relationships with young people. Child Abuse Review, 20(6), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, K., Morrison, F., Cree, V., Ruch, G., Hadfield, M., & Hallett, S. (2019). Emotional labour in social workers’ encounters with children and their families. The British Journal of Social Work, 49(1), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyness, M. (2006). Children, young people and civic participation: Regulation and local diversity. Educational Review, 58(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910600584173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar